Skip to comments.
Gay Marriage + Amnesty = Importing Terrorists
June 19, 2013
| Avoiding_Sulla
Posted on 06/19/2013 9:55:53 AM PDT by Avoiding_Sulla
Proposition: The following equation provides a quite accurate prediction.
Gay Marriage combined with loosening immigration enforcement requirements is equivalent to providing to undeclared cells of terrorists a legal means to bring in their undeclared terrorist "spouses."
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: vanity
Discuss.
To: Avoiding_Sulla
2
posted on
06/19/2013 9:58:26 AM PDT
by
Slings and Arrows
(You can't have IngSoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein)
To: Avoiding_Sulla
Wait... gay terrorists?
Al Pinka?
3
posted on
06/19/2013 10:04:00 AM PDT
by
Noamie
To: Noamie
You might say that Koran abhors homosexuality and so there is no way.
But the Koran also condones lying to Dhimmis, so it’s okay to tell Dhimmis “he’s my wife.”
4
posted on
06/19/2013 10:08:12 AM PDT
by
Avoiding_Sulla
(How humanitarian are "leaders" who back Malthusian, Utilitarian & Green nutcases?)
To: Slings and Arrows
If it were, I’d think I’d have heard it mentioned before. Or, as I’ve heard said more than once, another word for “obvious” is “overlooked.”
5
posted on
06/19/2013 10:09:35 AM PDT
by
Avoiding_Sulla
(How humanitarian are "leaders" who back Malthusian, Utilitarian & Green nutcases?)
To: Slings and Arrows
We could only pray that it becomes QED quickly. Especially with Boehner being as reliable as we have come to expect of him.
Should you see the equivalent of this equation repeated anywhere, please come back here with a link. It would provide a sign that the battle is turning in our favor.
6
posted on
06/19/2013 10:54:27 AM PDT
by
Avoiding_Sulla
(How humanitarian are "leaders" who back Malthusian, Utilitarian & Green nutcases?)
To: Avoiding_Sulla
I’ve heard similar suggestions made, such criminals “marrying” to avoid being forced to testify against each other.
7
posted on
06/19/2013 11:12:11 AM PDT
by
Slings and Arrows
(You can't have IngSoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein)
To: Slings and Arrows
Yes. That is one too. How convenient for the criminal class that there is a close similarity between it and the ruling class.
8
posted on
06/19/2013 11:20:46 AM PDT
by
Avoiding_Sulla
(How humanitarian are "leaders" who back Malthusian, Utilitarian & Green nutcases?)
To: Slings and Arrows
This came to mind from our little chat.
The Final Jeopardy category is FASCISM.
The Answer is: “They make the laws.”
You have 30 minutes. Remember to put your response in the form of a question.
9
posted on
06/19/2013 12:44:44 PM PDT
by
Avoiding_Sulla
(How humanitarian are "leaders" who back Malthusian, Utilitarian & Green nutcases?)
To: Avoiding_Sulla
10
posted on
06/19/2013 3:14:35 PM PDT
by
Slings and Arrows
(You can't have IngSoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein)
To: Slings and Arrows
Close, but I'm sorry, not specific enough. There was a hint of the answer in a previous comment.
Run your cursor over the space between the quotes to see the correct response.
" What is the principal distinction between the ruling class and the criminal class?"
11
posted on
06/19/2013 3:42:55 PM PDT
by
Avoiding_Sulla
(How humanitarian are "leaders" who back Malthusian, Utilitarian & Green nutcases?)
To: Slings and Arrows
I imagine you enjoy grim humor. Our neo-politburo They haven't left us with much else.
12
posted on
06/19/2013 4:03:38 PM PDT
by
Avoiding_Sulla
(How humanitarian are "leaders" who back Malthusian, Utilitarian & Green nutcases?)
To: Avoiding_Sulla
13
posted on
06/19/2013 4:21:44 PM PDT
by
Slings and Arrows
(You can't have IngSoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson