Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Getting the lead out, literally: U.S. Army plans switch to ‘green’ bullets
dailycaller.com ^ | 07/24/2013 | Michael Bastasch

Posted on 07/25/2013 8:04:26 AM PDT by kimtom

The U.S. Army is taking the expression “get the lead out” quite literally and switching to lead-free, environmentally-friendly bullets.

The Army’s Picatinny Arsenal is working on a “green” version of the M80A1 7.62 mm bullet, which troops are supposed to start being issued in 2014, according to an Army press release.

The Army has been looking to “green” small caliber ammo for some time now. In 2010, the Army switched to the greener 5.56 mm M855A1 Enhanced Performance Round. “The EPR replaces the lead slug with a copper slug,” said Lt. Col. Phil Clark, product manager for small caliber ammunition in the Program Executive Officer Ammunition. “This makes the projectile environmentally-friendly, while still giving soldiers the performance capabilities they need on the battlefield. So far we have eliminated 1,994 metric tons of lead from 5.56 ammunition production.”

“Thirty-two grains of lead are eliminated per M855A1 projectile, and 114.5 grains of lead will be eliminated per M80A1 projectile,” according to the Army.

The Army projects that the use of.....

(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ammo; military; usarmy; weapon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last
To: Portcall24

They will throw foul smelling used condoms at the enemy.

LLS


41 posted on 07/25/2013 8:57:37 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Bringbackthedraft

How about tungsten? Heavier and harder?


42 posted on 07/25/2013 8:58:41 AM PDT by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kimtom

Besides keeping the battlefield green, these rounds will also avoid lead poisoning of enemy combatants when we shoot them.

Rumor is the development of new “nerf” bombs.

New etiquette training will also be enforced such as no profanity by service people and scheduling appointments for drone attacks.


43 posted on 07/25/2013 9:08:43 AM PDT by School of Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mountainlion
"....making it less accurate...."

No, it makes it quite a bit more accurate. Using a bullet core that is essentially the same density as the jacket negates the consequences of jacket sidewall variations in thickness. Dr. Mann's "X-Factor" is thereby eliminated.

44 posted on 07/25/2013 9:53:59 AM PDT by Buffalo Head (Illigitimi non carborundum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: molson209
"Will this double or triple the cost of Ammo?"

No. Only the bullet component of the ammunition has a very slight cost increase. That has very small effect upon the total packaged ammunition cost.

45 posted on 07/25/2013 9:56:59 AM PDT by Buffalo Head (Illigitimi non carborundum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: School of Rational Thought

This is how our next war is going to be fought:

Chinese Soldier: Got any queens?
American Soldier: You homophobe... No, go fish.
Chinese Soldier: Fished a queen and he looks fabulous!
American Soldier: You are so silly. Like my khaki scarf? It’s Halston.
American President to Generals: Looks like Brucey lost Taiwan.


46 posted on 07/25/2013 9:58:16 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (The reason we own guns is to protect ourselves from those wanting to take our guns from us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Ghost of SVR4

Your position is very short sighted. The ammo is green so that it can be used domestically for training. It doesn’t make sense to inventory two different rounds.


47 posted on 07/25/2013 9:59:13 AM PDT by Buffalo Head (Illigitimi non carborundum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Head

Read up on Ballistic Coefficient.


48 posted on 07/25/2013 9:59:58 AM PDT by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: sprky777

????


49 posted on 07/25/2013 10:10:34 AM PDT by kimtom (USA ; Freedom is not Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice

Yep. Idiocracy. We’re living in one.


50 posted on 07/25/2013 10:21:44 AM PDT by SargeK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: kimtom

I would love to see the technical analysis that supports this move to copper slugs. For instance, what is the predicted real quantifiable benefit to the environment, and where, if one assumed continuation of the same relative level of combat activity over the next 20 years? How many American military lives will be lost due to the lowered range/effectiveness of this ammo? What will be the predicted increase in ammo costs? In market price of copper? In availability of copper for non-military uses such as electrical wiring?

How much more money will the Sierra Club give the DNC in campaign cash as a reward for this action? CAIR? The Muslim Brotherhood? George Soros?


51 posted on 07/25/2013 10:38:13 AM PDT by Avid Coug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Avid Coug

“...What will be the predicted increase in ammo costs? In market price of copper? In availability of copper for non-military uses such as electrical wiring?..”

The insiders have stock in those companies......


52 posted on 07/25/2013 10:43:17 AM PDT by kimtom (USA ; Freedom is not Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: kimtom

During the Mexican-American War (1846-1848), the Mexicans sed copper bullets. Copper bullets were banned at the time, by international agreements, because they were considered poisonous. If you couldn’t get the copper ball out of a wound, the copper would react with you fluids and make very deadly copper salts that would kill you.
So why are we switching to copper now?
Is it any less poisonous now than it was then?


53 posted on 07/25/2013 11:31:24 AM PDT by BuffaloJack (Gun Control is the Key to totalitarianism and genocide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuffaloJack

During the Mexican-American War (1846-1848), the Mexicans used copper bullets. Copper bullets were banned at the time, by international agreements, because they were considered poisonous. If you couldn’t get the copper ball out of a wound quickly, the copper would react with your fluids and make very deadly copper salts that would kill you.
So why are we switching to copper now?
Is it any less poisonous now than it was then?


54 posted on 07/25/2013 11:32:44 AM PDT by BuffaloJack (Gun Control is the Key to totalitarianism and genocide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

“Lead bullets are NOT the same type of lead say, in lead paint that people freak about.”

Well, not initially, anyway. Pure metallic lead isn’t too polluting, but have you ever seen lead bullets dug up from an American Civil War battleground? They are coated with a crumbly white powder called Lead Oxide. After a thousand years or so, those bullets will be completely transformed to that powder. Air gradually converts lead to Lead Oxide, the same white powder that was once the pigment used to manufacture white paint. In my younger days, I was the 3rd generation in my family to manufacture paint. By the time I began making paint, the industry had switched from Lead Oxide to other white pigments, such as Zinc Oxide, Titanium Dioxide and even talc powders; I used all of those.


55 posted on 07/25/2013 11:42:33 AM PDT by TexasRepublic (Socialism is the gospel of envy and the religion of thieves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: mountainlion
"Read up on Ballistic Coefficient."

No need. I know more about Ballistic Coefficients than you will ever know.

And for your information, Ballistic Coefficient has no effect upon accuracy other than the decreased bullet drag which potentially decreases wind drift variability in a variable wind velocity condition. In a constant wind, only precision is affected, not accuracy. If you don't know the difference between precision and accuracy, why are you writing about external ballistic matters?

It is recommended that you read and study the books "The Bullets Flight from Powder to Target by Franklin W. Mann and "Rifle Accuracy Facts" by Harold R. Vaughn. Then we can have an informed discussion.

56 posted on 07/25/2013 12:59:57 PM PDT by Buffalo Head (Illigitimi non carborundum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: mountainlion

“This of course will lower the ballistic Coefficient of the round making it less accurate and shorter ranged.”

I was just wondering about that. Thanks for answering the question. And copper isn’t going to do wonders for the environment either, but I’m sure we could spend lots of money studying it.


57 posted on 07/25/2013 3:12:40 PM PDT by OldNewYork (Biden '13. Impeach now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Head
Since you know everything and we peons can not know any thing maybe you can explain how, after a little ego deflation, how a bullet with irregular sidewall thickness will be more accurate than a bullet with a regular core and regular sidewall thickness? Also since the weight of a bullet figures into the ballistic coefficient explain to me how a bullet with a copper core, like in the article, which will have less mass and a lower ballistic coefficient will be more accurate?
58 posted on 07/25/2013 7:41:30 PM PDT by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: mountainlion
The tone of your letter precludes any effort at this time to educate you about external ballistic matters. A course on civility should be taken first.
59 posted on 07/26/2013 6:47:11 AM PDT by Buffalo Head (Illigitimi non carborundum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Head

No need. I know more about Ballistic Coefficients than you will ever know.

A course on civility should be taken first.


60 posted on 07/26/2013 6:50:08 AM PDT by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson