Posted on 07/26/2013 8:45:10 AM PDT by pinochet
On July 10, Ann Coulter made the amusing observation that George Zimmerman would make a better US Senator than Marco Rubio. What makes the statement amusing, is that Ann was not joking, and that the statement is true. A man like Zimmerman who cares about the quality of his neighborhood, would also care about the interests of his country.
http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2013-07-10.html
But we can take Ann's comparison much further, and ask ourselves whether Trayvon Martin would have made a better President than Obama. We know for sure, that President Trayvon would have done a better job defending traditional marriage, and opposing "gay marriage". Trayvon described gay people as "creepy-ass crackers", and he would never have let them join the military.
President Trayvon would have been tougher on the Taliban than Obama has been. While Trayvon was semi-literate, that was an advantage, because he would have been unable to read and understand complex subversive books such as those written by Karl Marx and Saul Alinsky. President Trayvon would have had a better economy than the Obama economy.
Rules! This admin don't need no stinkin' rules!
President Skittles would not have stepped on the 2nd. He wouldn't have fallen for Moo's school lunch program. He wouldn't have put up with the NSA, TSA and all the other spy and snoop agencies. No more black boxes on cars or backdoors to stop them. He'd make sure no one had to sign and present ID and get put on some "list" to buy OTC meds. He'd at least have been a NBC. You're right. We missed out on President Drank.
T would have sent in everyone 'cause he don't have time for that shiite.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.