Rand Paul: Hillary Clinton 'Needs to Be Deposed Again' to Explain Benghazi

CNS News ^ | 8-13-2013 | Susan Jones

[South40]

But he said he does believe that Clinton’s “decision-making process with regard to Benghazi” should preclude her from becoming president

Indeed it should. Thanks for pointing that out. :-)

[llevrok]

she is already despised so deposed wouldn't hurt.

[Homer1]

why, so all of the Rs can slobber all over her again and not ask any tough questions?

[Dr. Bogus Pachysandra]

“I am moving out of the country if Hillary is anointed president. “

But where?

[null and void]

Hillary had FBI files on 900 people.

NSA has files on 300,000,000...

[Rodamala]

I have a feeling we will have to wait for the 2016 Presidential Debates so that Rand himself can interrogate Hillary.

[smoothsailing]

That’s no good, it needs to be under oath.

[Digger]

Yeah - this time swear her in.

Yeah & what difference would that make. There aren't repercussions for libs. You know that, especially to the next crowned president by the low information voters.

[jonrick46]

Deposed? I think the Hildebeast needs to be disposed of with a bucket of water!

[Ann Archy]

But she WON’T be because.....Democrats are LAW-LESS.....Republicans are BALL-LESS!!!!

[Bon mots]

Not just the witch...

But Obongo too...

[varon]

"For six months leading up the attacks, they asked and they asked and they pleaded for more security, and she says, 'Oh, I never read the cables.' The problem with that is -- is that that's her job." (My emphasis)

No, that was not her job. Her job as Secretary of State, with the privilege of the "diplomatic pouch", was as bag lady for the The Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation money laundering operation.............

[Hotlanta Mike]

Yes she does...

[TBP]

So she can lie some more?

[txhurl]

Paul said he has asked Rep. Darrell Issa, the chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, to have Clinton brought back to answer more questions, “and I hope Chairman Issa will bring her back.

---

If Issa was on OUR SIDE Paul wouldn’t have to pressure him to bring her back under oath.

[smoothsailing]

So she can lie some more?

Precisely, but this time under oath.

[entropy12]

New Zealand or Australia.

[Hostage]

Rand Paul told her point blank that he would have held her as derelict in her duty. I don’t think he is going to treat her kindly.

[generally]

Where would you go? If there were a good alternative, I’d be packing my bags right now.

Without a better alternative, I choose to stay and fight. I fight at the voting booth. I fight the liberals with words and don’t let them get away with their lies. I fight the liberal businesses by not patronizing them (no Hollywood movies, etc.).

[entropy12]

Australia has a much more pro-capitalism government.
This community organizer from Chicago who never ran a hot dog stand at profit is a wealth re-distributor which is opposite of creating prosperity. With 48 million on food stamps and millions more every year, this ship can not be turned around. People have discovered free stuff and they like it. It will take 40-50 years before a change of direction is possible. This has happened in every country.

Even communist China now has over one million millionaires. Russia has low level flat income tax. But it took 50 years of trickle up poverty before they made a change. I do not have 50 years to wait. I am already on Medicare.