Posted on 09/11/2013 7:09:29 AM PDT by ShadowAce
President Obama never misses a chance to blame it on Bush, and last nights address to the nation on Syria was no exception.
The reason Obama has failed to win support military action in Syria, the president declared last night, is not because he has failed to lay out a coherent strategy its because of the terrible toll of Iraq and Afghanistan. Obama further slammed former president George W. Bush for presiding over a decade that put more and more war-making power in the hands of the president and more and more burdens on the shoulders of our troops, while sidelining the peoples representatives from the critical decisions about when we use force.
Put aside the fact that Congress explicitly authorized the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, while Obama did not seek congressional authorization before launching his war in Libya or that dozens of nations joined us in Iraq and Afghanistan, while in Syria we have . . . France.
If Bush was so bad, then why did Obama lift so much of his speech making the case for military action in Syria from Bushs speech making the case for military action in Iraq?
In his address Tuesday night arguing that the United States must hold a Baathist dictator who used chemical weapons against his own people to account, Obama said: I know Americans want all of us in Washington especially me to concentrate on the task of building our nation here at home. . . . Its no wonder then that youre asking hard questions. So let me answer some of the most important questions that Ive heard from members of Congress and that Ive read in letters that youve sent to me.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
Good one Ace... you’re right.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.