Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McAuliffe Leads Cuccinelli in Virginia Governor Race (41-40%)
http://www.wenzelstrategies.com ^ | October 24th, 2013 | Fritz Wenzel

Posted on 10/24/2013 9:27:46 PM PDT by Maelstorm

OCTOBER 24, 2013 – A new Wenzel Strategies poll of likely voters in Virginia shows the race for governor is a pretty tight contest, though Democrat Terry McAuliffe continues to enjoy a small lead. It all depends on what the turnout is going to be, and whether Democrats who turned out in big numbers last year for President Obama come out again for McAuliffe.

There is evidence in the new WS survey that that will not be the case, as both McAuliffe and Republican Ken Cuccinelli are not held in high esteem in the minds of voters and more people are discouraged with the general direction of the state than are encouraged. The Wenzel Strategies survey shows McAuliffe leading, 41% to 40%, with the balance of voters either favoring Libertarian Rob Sarvis (10%) or undecided.

The Wenzel Strategies poll, using a turnout model that is closely balanced, includes a sample of 28% Democrats, 26% Republicans, and 46% independent voters. This reflects the swing-state tradition of Virginia that has lately leaned toward Republicans in statewide, non-presidential years, but has tilted to the Democrats in recent presidential elections.

Using a turnout model replicated by Quinnipiac University in its recent survey, weighting the sample to include 33% Democrats, 25% Republicans, and 42% independents or minor party supporters, McAuliffe leads with 43%, compared to 38% Cuccinelli, 10% for Sarvis and 9% yet undecided. This reflects a slight tightening of the race, compared to the Quinnipiac survey that showed McAuliffe with a 7-point lead.

The survey shows there is reason to believe the race may well be tightening going into the final stretch, as a key issue benefitting McAuliffe fades into the rearview mirror – the recent government shutdown, which hit some parts of Virginia hard. As the shutdown fades, another key issue that benefits Cuccinelli – the expanding controversy over the bungled rollout of Obamacare – is bound to grab more attention among voters by the day. It could well be that Cuccinelli has bounced off his low point and is headed up.

Finally, the question of how many conservative voters who say now that they support Sarvis will actually follow through and vote for him is yet unanswered. Voters who are disaffected with the political establishment can say they are supporting a third-party candidate, but actually casting a ballot for a spoiler is quite another matter. Outsiders have won GOP primary elections in recent cycles, but my sense is it is less likely to happen in this instance, when Sarvis supporters know it could well lead directly to the election of someone whose political philosophy is completely opposite of their own.

Uncertainty on this question is further compounded by the fact that 53% of Virginians don’t even know enough about Sarvis to have formed an opinion about him. His support must be considered soft at best. In addition, a significant percentage said they were yet unsure about the race – 9% are yet undecided, yet are likely to vote.

The Wenzel Strategies survey shows voters are split on both McAuliffe and Cuccinelli. While 45% said they have a favorable opinion of McAuliffe, 46% have an unfavorable opinion of him. For Cuccinelli, 47% hold a favorable opinion, while 50% have an unfavorable opinion of him.

McAuliffe has done a better job locking down his political base, perhaps in part to recent campaigning in the state by both Clintons, who are longtime allies of McAuliffe. Among Democrats, McAuliffe wins 81% support. Among Republicans, Cuccinelli wins just 68% support. Among those who consider themselves political independents, Cuccinelli wins 44% support, compared to 33% for McAuliffe and 11% for Sarvis.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: 2013polls; clinton; cuccinelli; mcauliffe; va2013
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
To: JediJones

>> The elephant in the room is the libertarian.

Really? Was that true in 2012?


41 posted on 10/25/2013 12:50:20 AM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JediJones
If Ralph Nader hadn't been on the ballot in 2000 Gore would would have won Florida and the presidency. Same with Ross Perot in '92. Bush I would have likely beat Clinton.

Third parties don't win but can be spoilers.

42 posted on 10/25/2013 1:25:24 AM PDT by preacher (I am not a global warming hoax denier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: freedom462; fortheDeclaration; DIRTYSECRET; Viennacon
I know everyone claims bias in the MSM polls, but look back at the virginia presidential polls - they were almost all biased for Romney. Sad to say, there is no chance Cuccinelli even comes close.


43 posted on 10/25/2013 1:27:22 AM PDT by MrShoop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MrShoop
I know everyone claims bias in the MSM polls, but look back at the virginia presidential polls - they were almost all biased for Romney. Sad to say, there is no chance Cuccinelli even comes close.

Big difference between Presidential elections and off-cycle state elections. Turnout will be much lower -- which usually is to the benefit of the Republican candidate.

44 posted on 10/25/2013 2:02:47 AM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: Ignorance On Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: okie01

In the 2011 state senate elections, the GOP had 200,000 more votes for its candidates statewide than did the ‘Rats, even though the GOP had 11 uncontested district victories. The ‘Rat redistricting of the senate allowed them to achieve a 20-20 tie.

Here in northern Virginia, there are maybe 4 or 5 House of Delegates races (out of 35 or so seats in the region) that are competitive The lack of competitive races with local political operations is not going to help Terry McAwful.


45 posted on 10/25/2013 2:15:31 AM PDT by nd76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

They are now even so they had to rush out a push poll to show that mcawful has a slim lead.


46 posted on 10/25/2013 4:43:52 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

Libertarians - we stand for nothing and fall for every thing.


47 posted on 10/25/2013 5:47:28 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

A victory is not impossible—just improbable. We need a large turnout for Ken and a somewhat depressed Dem turnout. The Dems have already built up a lead based on polls of early voting. The Dems are very good at rounding up their voters and getting them to vote prior to election day. No doubt some fraud is also involved.


48 posted on 10/25/2013 6:37:06 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: JediJones
With him out of the mix, the Republican would be winning handily.

Not necessarily. Many of these voters would stay home and not vote for Rep or Dem. This idea of third parties drawing votes from the Reps and Dems is overblown. The very fact that there is a third party candidate or even more fringe parties is an indication of people being disaffected from the main parties.

49 posted on 10/25/2013 6:41:56 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: freedom462
Romney received a million more votes than McCain did in 2008 and Obama received 3.5 million less votes in 2012 than he did in 2008.
50 posted on 10/25/2013 6:48:59 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JediJones
We had some libertarians spoil some races last year too.

Maybe if the GOP backed up their small government, individual liberty rhetoric with real action instead of supporting the erosion of both of these things then people who value those things wouldn't go shopping for another place to vote. It's not just stoners who are voting Libertarian.

51 posted on 10/25/2013 6:55:20 AM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nd76

In the House of Delegates races (100 total) there are 16 Dems running unopposed compared to 29 Reps running unopposed. The fact is that the Rep vote could be more depressed than the Dem vote given the number of Reps running unopposed. On a positive note, there is no way the Dems will gain control of the House of Delegates this year.


52 posted on 10/25/2013 6:56:29 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Yes, Cuccinelli is running hard on his opposition to Obamacare and his role in fighting it at the state level. Ken emphasized that again and again in the debate last night.


53 posted on 10/25/2013 6:59:25 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: JediJones
No one should be able to win with less than 50% of the people preferring them. That’s not democratic.

Baloney. Why isn't it democratic? We have had Presidents who have been elected with less than 50% of the popular vote. European democracies with parliamentary governments have multiple parties.

More and more Americans are becoming frustrated with our two party system. What we have now is really one party with two wings--Dem and Rep.

54 posted on 10/25/2013 7:04:41 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

BTTT


55 posted on 10/25/2013 7:25:30 AM PDT by HokieMom (Pacepa : Can the U.S. afford a president who can't recognize anti-Americanism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Ken also needs to tie McAuliffe to Obamacare. I think he did that in the debate or at least said he would keep Obamacare out of VA.


56 posted on 10/25/2013 7:33:04 AM PDT by Kenny (<p>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Kenny

McAwful wants to expand Medicaid under Obamacare.


57 posted on 10/25/2013 7:56:17 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: what's up
Among Republicans, Cuccinelli wins just 68% support.

Sounds to me like the problem isn't with Libertarians. I'm not one and never would be, but this clip seems to indicate that Virginia has its share of establishment Republicans who won't get behind a conservative candidate.

58 posted on 10/25/2013 7:58:49 AM PDT by Colonel_Flagg (Some people meet their heroes. I raised mine. Go Army.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Mostly, and primarily, he wants to steal the election in ‘16 for hillary

all else is facade


59 posted on 10/25/2013 7:59:36 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Travon... Felony assault and battery hate crime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: freedom462; Maelstorm

What’s the GOP resistance to Cuccinelli? What were his missteps?


60 posted on 10/25/2013 8:23:26 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson