Republicans declare war on the Sen Conservatives Fund - SCF = "bullies with their noses in the air"

Washington Examiner ^ | November 1, 2013 | REBECCA BERG

[Memphis Moe]

Thanks for your thoughts; give McCaskill a kiss.

[Jane Long]

Same here! Ditto on the pound sand part, too ;-)

[Rodamala]

I don't know how exactly I got on their mailing list, perhaps through the dontfundobamacare.com petition that Ted Cruz plugged when he was on Rush 2 months ago...

...but I see the alerts on my phone that come in to my "junk email" account, and it's like a live alert on which RINO SCUMBAG is screwing the Republic at that very instant... I highly recommend signing up for these alerts by the Senate Conservatives Fund.

This is the "small print" at the bottom of their last email... which was an endorsement of Colonel Rob Maness along with a warning about his primary opponent Louisiana (R)ino Bill Casidy:

Senate Conservatives Fund (SCF) is an independent, grassroots organization dedicated to electing true conservatives to the United States Senate. SCF only supports candidates who have the courage to put principle ahead of party and fight for limited government, a strong national defense, and traditional family values. SCF is not affiliated with the Republican Party or any of its campaign committees. Contributions to the Senate Conservatives Fund PAC are not deductible as charitable contributions. Contributions from corporations or foreign nationals lacking permanent resident status are not permitted. Federal law requires Senate Conservatives Fund to report the name, mailing address, occupation and employer for each individual whose contributions aggregate in excess of $200 in a calendar year.  Not paid for at taxpayer expense.

[rbmillerjr]

“I will say it. No way in hell do I support akin or will the republican party support an ignoranamous like akin.”

when Akin made his boneheaded comment, he still led in the polls for weeks...until the sniveling wussies in the GOPe, leadership and Romney walked away from him and publicly demanded he step down.

Stupid.

[nathanbedford]

I have told this story before on FreeRepublic.

As a young believer in the Republican Party, I enthusiastically supported Barry Goldwater in 1964 and made my way to the South Orange Arena in New Jersey to participate in a rally for Goldwater where he was to speak. On the way into the facility we observed many Goldwater supporters who could not get in for want of tickets. I'm returning home and turning on the local 11 o'clock news out of New York to be told what I had been seeing, I was stunned to see those supporters of Goldwater converted by the magic of television into opponents of Goldwater protesting his appearance.

I never forgot how easily and deftly the media could lie and in the process simply eviscerate a conservative. It did not help that the the Rockefeller wing of the Republican Party was as least as vicious as Lyndon Johnson in collaborating with the media to abort what might be described as the tea party's spiritual birth.

[RKBA Democrat]

You got on their list through the don’t fund obamacare petition. That was a rather astute move on their part and now they have huge mailing list.

[Covenantor]

I never forgot how easily and deftly the media could lie and in the process simply eviscerate a conservative.

With only three TV networks it was easy to control and shape the "news". The coverage of the civil rights marches convinced the rest of that country the Faubus, Maddox, and Bull Conner were representative of the entire south, a prejuidice passed on and alive to this day.

The anti Goldwater commercial of the little girl picking daisies with a mushroom cloud in the back, IIRC, was broadcast only once as a paid commercial but was played repeatedly on prime time news. Nice tactic on several levels; plausabile deniability, "We immediately pulled the ad" cloaking themselves in the false virtue that has become their hallmark; huge campaign budget savings, prime time ads were very expensivee; and the lasting icon, GOP = Dr. Strangelove mad bombers.

Not too long ago, in a bourbon fueled discussion with friends, the subject of mass news presentations before the then new television medium arose. We realized that so much was derived from Movietone News played at the local theaters. We all had vivid memories of the siege of Dien Bien Phu from our pre-teen years. Before some of us even had TV's. And came the realization that the producers and editors of these news reels came from the left wing cadres that produced the WWII news and propaganda films.

Same as it ever was. Just finely honed.

[Betty Jane]

I agree we won’t get everything we want in one fell swoop. The Precinct Project, which is not mine, points a way to have a larger voice in the Republican Party. It takes a few a hours a month attending the local party meetings and walking districts. If every conservative were to sign up and sacrifice the time needed, we could ultimately remake the party from the ground up.

www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com
The plan is to get conservatives to become precinct captains in the 200,000 out of 400,000 empty positions across the country. Precinct captains are the ones who vote in the leadership at the local level who then get to vote at the state level. There are committees for vetting candidates.

It’s definitely something to look into for TEA Partiers and conservatives of all stripes. And for those stuck in blue areas, it might be a fun way to infiltrate the Dems. Imagine the TEA Party democrats wreaking havoc at the local level.

[nathanbedford]

When Hitler invaded Russia, Churchill said to the the House of Commons, "if Hitler had invaded hell I would at least make a friendly reference to the devil" thus defending his aligning England with Joseph Stalin one of the great mass murderers of the 20th century and a regime which Churchill had bitterly opposed even at the risk of his fragile political standing since 1918.

I think history has judged Churchill right on this issue although even Churchill recognized that he was forced by the sheer magnitude of threat which Hitler posed to England who stood alone with the Empire to make alliances against Hitler where he could.

But let us suppose that Hitler contrived a reverse Molotov/Ribbentrop pact with England and Churchill had announced that England was about to make common cause with Germany to drive Soviet Union out of Poland which it had ruthlessly attacked and occupied.

Who can believe that the propaganda of World War II would have been nearly so enthusiastic had it been cast against a leftist enemy, "uncle Joe" Stalin and who can believe that it would have been nearly so blind to Hitler's crimes as it was to Stalin's crimes? This bias has extended well into the Cold War and a we see its consequences in the Korea war, in the Vietnam War and in the war over Star Wars.

I cannot believe that Republican candidates do not devote a much larger share of their war chests to comedy writers who can satire Democrats and give Republicans a panache of coolness which candidates like Romney, McCain and Bob Dole so obviously lacked. They need something to break through the media and satire is the obvious choice. It would only cost a fraction of what they spend in repetitive TV ads which obviously are not working.

[McGavin999]

Next time the RNC calls for a donation I’m going to tell them they’re too late, I gave everything I could to the SCF.

[Tainan]

"Bully" is a current buzz word du-jure.

Silly Republicans stuck-on-stupid eating their own.

[donmeaker]

Senate Republican fund is a bunch of statist bullies attacking people who want to return to limited and constitutional government.

[donmeaker]

I would be happy with a third party that would draw patriotic folks from the Democratic Party.

That alone would be enough to win in most places.

[donmeaker]

Some would think that the guy in Missouri sunk himself by being stupid.

It would be a really good thing if a Republican candidate knew how to answer the abortion question that he is sure to be asked.

Of course that Republican candidate won his primary through Democratic voter support.

[MortMan]

I'm wavering on this one. Yes, RINOs need replacement, but a split party is risky in this particular crucial mid-term. If it costs us the Senate, it'll kill me. Should we begin the purge in '16 instead ?

Being that this is the GOPe's argument every single election, I would say that it won't wait for 2016.

[GeronL]

No more wavering. We aren’t going to surrender to the RINO GOPe any more. “If it costs us the Senate...” - we don’t have the Senate now, and RINO’s will not give it us either.