Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas hospital to take pregnant, brain-dead woman off ventilator (Update: It's been done)
CNN ^ | January 26, 2014 | Matt Smith and Jason Morris

Posted on 01/26/2014 11:20:25 AM PST by Zakeet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 361-365 next last
To: MHGinTN

bump


61 posted on 01/26/2014 12:30:45 PM PST by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mom MD

If there were such severe deformities, would it have been wrong to bring the child into the air world (born of water) and allow the child to expire if at that point physicians examine the child and find that in fact the defromities are too great? Or should alive children regardless of how severely they’re deformed to be terminate in the womb? ... I ask because I don’t have an answer for that one.


62 posted on 01/26/2014 12:31:47 PM PST by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: kaila
I don't mean to offend, but: you're using (perhaps unintentionally) one of the pro-legal-abortion mantras--"quality of life"--to justify the ending of the life of the child (and of the mother... since "brain death" is the slipperiest of definitions, nowadays (especially with the high demand for "fresh organs" for transplant), and numerous accounts exist of people waking/recovering from alleged "brain death").

If the child dies after our every effort to save him/her, then okay... it's in God's hands, and we did everything that was morally right to do; but if the child dies after our free decision to pull necessary life-sustaining measures, then we're complicit.

The fetus also had hydrocephalus, cardiac abnormalities, and deformed lower extremities. This would not result in a normal existence.

So... "abnormal" = "better dead than alive", or "it's okay to be ambivalent about protecting an 'abnormal' person's right to life", or "it's okay to kill abnormal people"? Would you be okay with putting a bullet into a *born* person with all of the above abnormalities? If not, then I don't see why you'd think death in the womb would be any better than death outside the womb, unless you've (at least unconsciously) bought into the pro-abort "personhood inside the womb isn't as full as personhood outside the womb" and "it's better that he/she died before birth than after" ideas. Sorry... but I can't agree at all.
63 posted on 01/26/2014 12:31:54 PM PST by paladinan (Rule #1: There is a God. Rule #2: It isn't you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: bert; erkelly
God is a God of love.

Check out these attributes of God.

1. God is eternal, i.e., always was, is, and ever will be.

2. God is omnipresent, i.e., He is in every place.

3. God is immutable, i.e., He ever remains the same.

4. God is omniscient, i.e., He knows all things, the past, the

present, and the future, and also our inmost thoughts (Jer. xvii.

10).

5. God is supremely wise, i.e., He knows how to direct every

thing for the best in order to carry out His designs.

6. God is almighty, i.e., God can do all that He wills, and that

by a mere act of His will.

7. God is supremely good, i.e., He loves His creatures far more

than a father loves his children.

9. God is full of mercy and compassion, i.e., He very readily

forgives our sins when we are sincerely sorry for them.

10. God is infinitely holy, i.e., He loves good and hates all evil.

11. God is infinitely just, i.e., He rewards all good and pun-

ishes all evil deeds.

12. God is a God of perfect truth, i.e., all that He reveals to

man is true.


64 posted on 01/26/2014 12:32:10 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

God allowed it to happen as a consequence of sin. But He also provided redemption and new life beyond the tragedy at unfathomable cost to Himself. It is our choice whether we take His offer


65 posted on 01/26/2014 12:33:37 PM PST by Mom MD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: blu

I agree with you. This baby was not listening to the sound of its mothers voice, feeling her movements, and being exposed to the daily hormone fluctuations of life. It was left in an abnormal vacuum created by man with no chance at normal development.


66 posted on 01/26/2014 12:34:29 PM PST by ToastedHead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: blu
This is not the result of any action by any man. This was God's decision, as are all decisions when it comes to life and death.

Acknowledging your excellent post otherwise, God doesn't make life and death decisions here on earth. We became responsible for our actions and sin after Adam and Eve ate from the Tree of Knowledge, the original sin.

Everything from that point forward is our fault and we are responsible, not God. Yes, this woman's death is a tragedy however it was not God's "decision."

67 posted on 01/26/2014 12:35:04 PM PST by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: blu

You have expressed my feelings on the matter exactly. Extreme measures are just that... extreme. Not taking them them is not anti-life, but an acknowledgment that we aren’t God.


68 posted on 01/26/2014 12:35:10 PM PST by Valpal1 (If the police can t solve a problem with violence, they ll find a way to fix it with brute force)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

I don’t think either course is wrong and both are tragic. Personally I would not choose to mutilate the body of a loved one to surgically deliver a deteriorating and non viable child not would I put the child through whatever pain they were still capable of feeling during the birth and resuscitation process. But others could see it differently. We make the best decisions we can in horrible situations


69 posted on 01/26/2014 12:36:54 PM PST by Mom MD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Mom MD

...”They are in my prayers today”....

Mine as well...

....this decision is one no family wants to make...but is made every day when faced with life support issues. My family had to make such a decision twice to let family members go... It’s very difficult.

I think the family’s and Doctors decision on Nov. 28th should have stood.


70 posted on 01/26/2014 12:40:37 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Mom MD

I was actually thinking of Senator Santorum’s child who was born severely deformed and die minutes following delivery. I don’t have an adequate answer for that scenario yet, but it is not irrelevant and perhaps we who are busily discussing this raft of issues are one reason to believe God allowed this to progress to this point. I just don’t know.


71 posted on 01/26/2014 12:42:47 PM PST by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: paladinan

You infer whatever you want. I am not going to argue with you. But, the baby had hydrocepahlus, cardiac abnormalities, and deformed lower extremities. I am just stating the facts of the case. That is not normal development. That is the fact. You can argue about pro life, and all that, but I dont want to get into that argument. I am just stating the facts. 23 weekers are too young for NICU care, also. That is another fact. I was responding to someone who stated that maybe this baby would be normal. .Don’t jump all over people who are stating the facts of this terrible situation.


72 posted on 01/26/2014 12:43:07 PM PST by kaila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Mom MD
I cannot fault the family for this decision. They need our prayers as Im sure it was gut wrenching.

Agree. Anytime a loved one is lost this way it's gut wrenching. Went through it with my younger brother in August 2012 when he passed away from a brain aneurysm. Wouldn't wish having to go through the experience on my worst enemy.

73 posted on 01/26/2014 12:45:26 PM PST by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

It does not help the pro-life movement
_____________________________________________

to use the pro-abortion excuse that the baby wasn’t perfect enough to be allowed to live...


74 posted on 01/26/2014 12:46:08 PM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

bump


75 posted on 01/26/2014 12:48:19 PM PST by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mom MD; kaila

About the unborn baby’s deformities:

Was there any source besides the family’s attorneys? That’s the only source mentioned in any CNN story I’ve read about this.

I wouldn’t consider attorneys with vested interests nor CNN to be reliable sources on the health of unborn children.


76 posted on 01/26/2014 12:49:29 PM PST by angryoldfatman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: mlizzy

I have heard that they have done no testing on the baby in quite a while. If so, then that is strange. If they are not monitoring, then are they doing anything more than covering their behinds?

At bottom is the horrible decision of the Supreme Court to vest absolute rights on the “gravitas,” in a pregnancy and deny all recognition to the fetus. In reality, of course, the aim was to shield the abortionist from all legal reponsibility, and the only way to do this is to allow doctors to say that they owe nothing to the unborn child beyond that which the mother requests, that the state cannot demand that the unborn be treated as patients. They created the legal fiction of a separation of mother and child that does not physically exist. A pregnancy involves two entities, and during this time, the woman’s whole body is invested in providing for the child. Under the abortion right, they are treating the baby as if he were in fact a life-draining tumor/cancer that needs to be removed from the body to save her life. When the law creates a false reality, we get situations like this.


77 posted on 01/26/2014 12:50:09 PM PST by RobbyS (quotes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Lord have mercy on them for taking the baby’s life.

No one took the baby's life. Stop bearing false witness.

78 posted on 01/26/2014 12:52:29 PM PST by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

It was not because the baby was not perfect enough. It was because it was not viable.

But thanks for proving my point.


79 posted on 01/26/2014 12:52:53 PM PST by Second Amendment First
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: angryoldfatman

I would not think it would be in the best interest of the attorney to lie, especially with medical records as part of the evidence. I know a lot of attorneys, if they lied in front of the judge, or gave misleading statements they could face censure of lose their license. There is plenty of evidence in the medical records. Scans, ultrasounds, etc.


80 posted on 01/26/2014 12:53:40 PM PST by kaila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 361-365 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson