[ROCKLOBSTER]

Yeah, both the Kenyan Marxist and his White House spokes-kid were using the term recently.

In the face of this hard winter, don’t they know how stupid they look?

Having killed their own reservoirs, the CA “drought” is largely a RAT-made disaster. (terrorism)

[sickoflibs]

We were forced to give up light bulbs, and yet we are always lectured that its not enough.

David Gregory says it would require much pain now for a better future, to Marsha Blackburn

And we can keep our doctors too.

[MNDude]

I can survive in hot dust bowls, or we can survive in Arctic tundras, but I cannot live in a world without freedom.

[Ruy Dias de Bivar]

At the start of the “Glo-Bull” warming scare around 1997, the jonquils came up through the ground on Jan 5, earlier than I have ever seen them.

This year the jonquils poked their heads through the ground on Feb 14, about when they would normally come up.

[SamAdams76]

The ironic thing is that we've always had "climate change." Well before humans started populating the earth, we've had ice ages, for example. Most of North America was covered under thick sheets of ice at least several times and shall be again - with or without us (the human race).

At some point, probably in about 5 billion years, our sun will run out of fuel. But not before turning into a "red giant" and vaporizing the earth with intense heat (before cooling into a white dwarf). Now there's your global warming right there.

[biff]

I can “gaaranteee” you that my very liberal sis in law in Minneapolis would give her eye teeth right now for a little bit of global warming.

[Lou L]

You know what's even worse? The politicians and talking heads are only proposing "punishments" for the time being: excessive taxes on individuals and businesses, the ludicrus need for purchasing and dealing with "carbon credits," compliance for energy reduction and consumption, and the endless need to deal with ideas like recycling and the purchase of expensive light bulbs.

But what's the plan for "correcting" the global warming? Are we so presumptuous to believe that we can do things as people, to alter our climate? What things do we measure to tell if any such proposal is producing a more ideal climate? This is the ultimate liberal fantasy--a never-ending premise that gives them power over taxation, power over energy and consumption policies, and power over everyone's lives. This includes farming, transportation, where we live and commute, and how we conduct business.

[Cowboy Bob]

The national debt will have a greater impact on my life than global warming. I don't give a Shiite about global warming...even if it existed.

[CedarDave]

See also:

CRISES IN CLIMATOLOGY

[pepsi_junkie]

And in Kerry’s case he has even more reason to emphasize climate armageddon over nuclear armageddon. He and his boss are about to allow Iran to have a real weapon of mass destruction. Better to downplay it.

Obama got a Nobel Peace Prize for talking about nuclear non-proliferation and then set the stage for Iran to get the bomb. Way to go, Nobel!

[PATRIOT1876]

Kerry ALMOST got it right.

He should’ve said, “believing in the man made global warming hoax and making laws about it are as great a threat to humanity as terrorism and WMDs.”

[olezip]

Why had our secretary of State, whom even Wikipedia describes as having been a mediocre student and who has no discernible background in science and technology (other than being able to windsurf), settled on “climate change” as his cause célèbre of the moment?

It looks like Kerry is inside the "low information" voter group, like most, if not all, Democrats.