Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CPAC to Palin: ‘Run, Sarah, Run!’
The National Review's The Corner ^ | March 8, 2014 | Eliana Johnson

Posted on 03/08/2014 5:44:57 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: JaguarXKE

And yet … the straw poll — is rigged.
***********************
It always has been, yet the media spews the results like they are predictors. ...I recall that libertarians at CPAC a few years ago pushed the vote so much that Ron Paul was the winner, and I suspect that’s what has happened each of the past two CPACs when Rand came in first.

As to topic: I watched Sarah’s keynote speech live and she was on fire! She actually had me cheering out loud as I watched on TV. ....Don’t see her as POTUS, but she would be a great Sec. of Interior or Energy.


61 posted on 03/08/2014 11:32:51 PM PST by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

Last reply be me to you as I have seen your comments on other threads and I don’t consider you a rational person to have discourse with, but you and your ilk are dooming your fellow countrymen to the same abysmal existence we have had for the past 5 years under Dem rule. You get the government you deserve. Good nite.


62 posted on 03/09/2014 12:51:31 AM PST by flaglady47 (Oppressors can tyranize only w/a standing army-enslaved press-disarmed populace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47; JRandomFreeper
purists like you

I will bet that most of the 3 million people would take an "impure" republican over a liberal like Romney any day.

The real purists are the liberals in the republican party who abandoned candidates like Ken Cuccinelli in Virginia.

63 posted on 03/09/2014 3:42:16 AM PDT by Moorings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47
political naive foolish person

Politically naive is foisting a left wing liberal candidate on a conservative base.

Politically naive is thinking that you can bully, browbeat, guilt-trip, and blackmail people into voting for a distasteful candidate.

Foolish is trying to do that over and over again, and then blaming the voters, when you don't succeed.

64 posted on 03/09/2014 3:49:05 AM PDT by Moorings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Moorings; flaglady47; JRandomFreeper
purists like you

In all my years on Free Republic, I have never seen a purist. Not once.

On the other hand, I have seen many who accuse others of being purists for declining to vote for more statism.

The GOP didn't ask me to compromise my principles when it asked me to vote for Romney. It asked me to abandon them.

Poor ol' flaglady is totally in the dark.

65 posted on 03/09/2014 3:58:48 AM PDT by Finny (Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. -- Psalm 119:105)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
Let her announce she's running, and watch what happens to that number. It'll shrink into insignificance before your eyes.

LOL. So you're saying all those people are supporting Cruz and Paul only because Palin hasn't officially announced?

66 posted on 03/09/2014 4:17:05 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: JaguarXKE
And how many of them are liberal Democrats? Don’t give a rat’s what any poll says frankly.

I never really thought of Drudge as a hangout for liberal Democrats.

67 posted on 03/09/2014 4:18:05 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

But are you an Extremely Extremely More Extreme Conservative than Romney?


68 posted on 03/09/2014 4:46:50 AM PDT by A'elian' nation ("Political Correctness does not legislate tolerance; it only organizes hatred." Jacques Barzun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

“Certainly even they must recognize she’s a savant and not an idiot.”

Right after her speech some pasty-faced boy-anchor on FOX news ridiculed Palin and was disgustingly dismissive of her.

Sarah Palin makes me smile and feel good about the country we once had.


69 posted on 03/09/2014 4:51:02 AM PDT by A'elian' nation ("Political Correctness does not legislate tolerance; it only organizes hatred." Jacques Barzun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
AND CRUZ GOT ONLY 11 PERCENT IN THE CPAC STRAW.....HEY FOLKS..AMNESTY IS EVERYTHING! WHY DON'T WE HEAR THE CRUCIAL ANTI AMNESTY DRUM BEAT? REPUBLICANS REPUBLICANS REPUBLICANS.....WHEN IN THE HELL ARE YOU GOING TO COME OUT OF THE WOODS AND DO YOU PART ....SAVING THE REPUBLIC?....IT'S JUST SICKENING.....

WTF..WE'RE ALL WONDERING REPUBLICAN PARTY: WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU?


70 posted on 03/09/2014 4:54:11 AM PDT by jimsin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: A'elian' nation
I forget his name but he probably threw a hissy fit because FNC showed her speech uninterrupted during his broadcast time. I give FNC credit for that.
71 posted on 03/09/2014 4:54:30 AM PDT by McGruff (Republicans need to show Obama some RSPECT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47
By nominating liberal republican candidates, you and your ilk are dooming your fellow countrymen to the same abysmal existence we have had for the past 5 years under Dem rule.

Because you KNOW and have proof that 3 million of the base won't vote for liberal republicans.

That's irrational.

/johnny

72 posted on 03/09/2014 6:04:38 AM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; All

On Grey Jarret of Fox News trashing, mocking, laughing at Sarah last night on Fox after Sarah finished?

I hope everybody that calls Sarah a friend will let fox know that you are outraged

I am asking for a public apology


73 posted on 03/09/2014 7:27:22 AM PDT by Friendofgeorge (Sarah Palin 2016 OR BUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Friendofgeorge

Greg Jarret


74 posted on 03/09/2014 7:28:23 AM PDT by Friendofgeorge (Sarah Palin 2016 OR BUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: tinamina
Frickin' fashion disaster. Sarah. baby, burn that dress, fix the huge varnished hair, the Morticia make-up, lose the 1950's librarian spectacles. The speech was too cute by half. Talk Program, Plan, you as a Leader. Not this.

Who is doing this to her? Looks and speech-wise, We need Maggie Thatcher-type cred and class. This act could take her right out'o'the picture.

A beautiful, poweful woman and no one around her can figure this out?

75 posted on 03/09/2014 8:29:50 AM PDT by Kenny Bunk ( The Republican Party is in Hospice Care. Hold all contributions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

No, I’m not saying that at all. I think people’s votes in these polls reflect their individual forecasts of the likely near-term future. Few of them think (at this point) that Sarah will run. I believe the poll votes would shift dramatically in Palin’s favor if there were strong evidence that she was planning to.


76 posted on 03/09/2014 10:23:08 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: ELS
If she runs, she needs to declare her candidacy early so that the conservatives will coalesce around her and we won't have a rerun of 2012

Agree. I rarely find fault with Gov Palin, but her procrastination in the 2012 primary was a huge error. The longer she waited, the more out of control the process became, which only benefited the establishment GOP.

I honestly believe she intended to run, but the field filled up fast, and that altered the dynamics in lots of weird ways. I really believe it's one of the few times in her life that she was indecisive.

In hindsight, I'm sure she sees that those dynamics would have probably shifted in her favor, had she declared by early summer.

77 posted on 03/09/2014 10:46:26 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
I believe the poll votes would shift dramatically in Palin’s favor if there were strong evidence that she was planning to.

I disagree. Palin, if she announces, will be fighting for the conservative wing. Cruz and Paul already have their supporters locked. Palin may pick some support up from the Perry or Huckabee or Santorum supporters should any of those men not run, or run and drop out. But she's trailing the big two right now and an announcement won't change that.

78 posted on 03/09/2014 10:46:50 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
Palin, if she announces, will be fighting for the conservative wing. Cruz and Paul already have their supporters locked. Palin may pick some support up from the Perry or Huckabee or Santorum supporters

Oh please....no one's running yet, and no one's got supporters "locked up". This time next year, we'll still be about a year and a half away from election day, so it's still waaaay to early to be talking real baseball.

A whole lot is going to happen between now and the start of the real horse race. We've got a midterm election to focus on first. That's a lot more important (and forecast-able) than the 2016 presidential election.

Lastly - do not underestimate Sarah Palin. She's proven the doubters, natterers, and naysayers wrong on too many occasions to count.

79 posted on 03/09/2014 11:10:31 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47

Romney lost because when people who like big government handing them goodies have a choice between a real Democrat and Democrat-lite, they pick the real ‘rat every time.


80 posted on 03/09/2014 2:50:23 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson