Skip to comments.Job Creators Sue Federal Government
Posted on 03/23/2014 3:52:21 PM PDT by Kaslin
For years environmentalists have usurped individual private property rights and thwarted economic development. Now, thanks to Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt, it appears that the job creators may have finally learned something from the extreme tactics of groups, like the Wild Earth Guardians and the Center for Biological Diversity (CBD), which have been using the courts to their advantage by filing lawsuits against the federal government.
On Monday, March 17, on behalf of the state of Oklahoma and the Domestic Energy Producers Alliance (DEPA), Pruitt filed a lawsuit against the federal government, specifically the U.S. Department of the Interior and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS). The lawsuit alleges the FWS engaged in sue and settle tactics when the agency agreed to settle a lawsuit with a national environmental group over the [Endangered Species Act] listing status of several animal species, including the Lesser Prairie Chicken.
The Lesser Prairie Chicken (LPC) is especially important, as the FWS is requiredbased on the conditions set forth in the settlement of a 2010 lawsuitto make a determination, explicitly, on the LPC by March 31, 2014. A threatened listing would restrict the land use in the birds 40-million-acre, five-state habitat: Oklahoma, Colorado, Texas, New Mexico, and Kansas. The affected area includes private, state, and federal landslands rich in energy resources, ranch and farm landplus, municipal infrastructure, such as water pipelines and electric transmission.
Understanding the negative impact a listing would have, industry (oil and gas, electric transmission and distribution, pipelines, agriculture and wind energy), states, and the FWS have collaborated to develop a historic range-wide plan (RWP) to demonstrate that the LPC and its prairie habitat can be protected without needing to list it. The RWP includes habitat management goals and conservation practices to be applied throughout the LPCs range. According to a press release about the Oklahoma law suit, the cooperative effort has spent $26 million dollars on the voluntary conservation planwhich would be more than enough to protect restore LPC habitat, as well as to develop an elaborate state-of-the-art LPC hatchery. RWP enrollees are optimistic the FWS can cite the conservation commitment as justification for a decision not to list the LPC as a threatened species.
A DEPA spokesman states: this designation could disrupt drilling and exploration on hundreds of thousands of very promising oil and gas lands in this part of the country. The CBD has made no secret of their disdain for oil and gas extraction and has filed many successful lawsuits specifically to block development.
Pruitt says: the sue-and-settle timelines force the FWS to make determinations without a thorough review of the science. This violates the original statute requiring sound science before listing species.
Stephen Moore, formerly with the Wall Street Journal, explains: Under the Obama administration, the feds have entered into a consent agreement with the environmentalists to rush forward a judgment on an unprecedented number of species. A 2012 Chamber of Commerce study found record numbers of such sue and settle cases under Obama. Pruitt adds: Under President Obama, we have had sue and settle on steroids.
The rush as Moore calls it, is being driven by the desire to get the decisions made under the friendly Obama Administrationwhich may appease the environmental base while, unwittingly, hurting Democrats in the 2014 elections and handing the Senate to Republicans.
The LPC decision impacts five western states, from which even Democrat Senators, aware of the potential economic impact, sent a letter to the FWS asking to delay listing the LPC as threatened. The next big listing is the Greater Sage Grouse (GSG) with a habitat covering eleven western states. If the LPC is listed, after the groundbreaking efforts to preserve its habitat, there will be no similar cooperation on the GSG. The GSG will surely be listedtriggering a modern Sage Brush Rebellion and costing Democrats the Senate (and some House seats, too).
The Democrats are in a bind. The rushed listings are being forced by the environmental base, which is myopically focused on the anti-fossil-fuel (job-killing) agenda of restricting oil-and-gas development on western lands and isnt looking at the bigger political consequences.
It appears the decision has been made. Sources tell me that Dan Ashe, Director of the FWS, has called a meeting on Capitol Hill to brief the stakeholders prior to Thursdays announcement. If he decides to list the LPC, Pruitts lawsuit could be just the first shot that ignites the new rebellion pushing states to take control of the lands within their borders.
Kent Holsinger, a Colorado-based attorney specializing in Endangered Species Act (ESA) issues, told me: State wildlife management is much more efficient and effective than federal listings. Oklahoma and DEPA should be commended for pushing back on these issues.
The environmentalists are looking at the end, but not the political means.
For CBD, it isnt even about the science. Its staff page boasts three times as many attorneys as biologists.
In a High Country News interview with CBD co-founder Kieran Suckling, he explains how their strategy was developed through their first major victory over the Mexican wolf.
Previously environmental groups had no leverage with the government, other than saying pretty please. In the case of the wolf, groups proposed introducing it onto New Mexicos White Sands Missile Range. The general in charge of the range had no interest. Suckling reports: The strategy of the wolf coalition was to wait for the general to retire. We decided, lets just sue instead. It got settled with the Service agreeing to do a wolf study, which led to reintroduction. That was the moment when we looked at it and said, Wow. The environmental movement spent a decade going to meetings and demanding action and getting nothing done. They were asking powerful people for something from a position of no power. We realized that we can bypass the officials and sue, and that we can get things done in court.
Suckling called lawsuits: one tool in a larger campaign. He explained: we use lawsuits to help shift the balance of power from industry and government agencies, toward protecting endangered species. That plays out on many levels. At its simplest, by obtaining an injunction to shut down logging or prevent the filling of a dam, the power shifts to our hands. The Forest Service needs our agreement to get back to work, and we are in the position of being able to powerfully negotiate the terms of releasing the injunction.
When asked if his lack of a degree in science was a hindrance, he answered: No and pointed out that the professionalization of the environmental movement has injured it greatly. He added: Im more interested in hiring philosophers, linguists and poets. The core talent of a successful environmental activist is not science and law. Its campaigning instinct. They operate on emotion, not science.
Sue and Settle
It is these tactics, along with a friendly Obama government, that has led to the sue and settle procedure that Pruitts lawsuit is hoping to end. The lawsuit is seeking declaratory and injunctive relief for violations of the ESA. Moore reports: The relief is intended to overturn designations of dozens of species added to the threatened or endangered list through the sue and settle process.
The Oklahoma lawsuit asserts: the Fish and Wildlife Service violated the Endangered Species Act by agreeing in its settlement with Wild Earth Guardians to not consider the statutorily-created warranted but precluded category when determining the listing status of the 251 candidate species. Additionally, the lawsuit states: the FWS violated the law by agreeing to a truncated timeline to the decision-making process on the listing status of the 251 candidate species, essentially sidestepping the rule making process.
Pruitt believes that: because these settlements are taking place without public input, attorneys general are unable to represent the respective interests of their states, businesses, and citizens. Forbes Contributor Larry Bell agrees: While the environmental group is given a seat at the table, outsiders who are most impacted are excluded, with no opportunity to object to the settlements.
Bell describes the sue and settle practicesometimes referred to as friendly lawsuitsthis way:
Cozy deals through which far-left radical environmental groups file lawsuits against federal agencies wherein court-ordered consent decrees are issued based upon a prearranged settlement agreement they collaboratively craft together in advance behind closed doors. Then, rather than allowing the entire process to play out, the agency being sued settles the lawsuit by agreeing to move forward with the requested action they and the litigants both want.
In a succinct soliloquy about the LPC and GSG, Fox Business Stuart Varney says: Ive always been amazed at the ability of a very small, but well-funded, group to get their way using the court system. But, that is what really is happening. The Sage Grouse and the Lesser Prairie Chicken interests are obviously far more important than Americas interest in energy independence.
Gratefully, Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt has stepped up to the plate and used the environmentalists tactics and filed a lawsuit against the federal government. It will not delay the March 31 deadline for the FWS decision on the LPC, but it could overturn designations of dozens of species added to the threatened or endangered list through the sue and settle process. It could prevent the unnecessary listing of thousands of other flora and faunaallowing companies to continue providing the jobs, producing the oil, natural gas, and other commodities such as timber and critical minerals that are so important to America and our energy freedom.
Eco-Weenies FINALLY called out for what they always were:
Discovery will be interesting. They will be stonewalled, so there will be a fight.
Just another way the dems use the courts to impose their will on the voters with out any input from the voters. In essence a dictatorship by government bureaucrats.
What is Lesser Prairie Chicken like. Cornish game hen?
Next to the devil
It looks a lot like a Darter Snail, or a Delta Smelt.
A big effin stack of unemployment checks.
It’s what government does. It’s their job.
Every war on earth and every mass atrocity was committed by a government.
It tastes a lot like chicken you might find on the prairie.
It was once hunted and that’s why it’s scarce today.
Of course we might ask why not just raise them on farms? Well that’s a good way to get greenies to have apoplexy.
Mark Levin has talked about this extensively on his show.
Environmentalists have infiltrated the govt agencies. They are working the system to force all of these things through.
A gold mine for the devil's handmaidens. Lawyers , but I repeat myself.
Groomed by our illustrious education system, along with the enviors.
If the GOP wins the senate, who thinks congress will pass a bill to deny these Leftist groups the standing to sue?
No standing, no lawsuits, no problem.
more or less
The lesser Prairie Chicken is radio show for poultry starring “ROOSTERSON” Keillor featuring stories form Lake Chicken Coop, Minnesota where the hens cluck a lot and the chicks “taste above average”!
Excellent. These sue and settle agreements are a fraud. We need to eliminate sovereign immunity for these guys and go after them personally.
Why not just call it survival of the fittest and let them die out? What harm has the long, long history of extinction done to the world?
That’s hard and they’ll find “standing” somehow. Obama won’t go along with that and they’ll murder us in the press.
Better to show the incredible destruction of jobs, the fact that “species” are undefined and just guesswork and reasonable alternatives including moving the animals to ranches, breeding and release programs (just like game fish) etc.
All of that is much less destructive and expensive than NIMBYism.
Not only do the enviros sue and settle, the taxpayers pay their attorneys fee through a law known as Equal Access to Justice Act(EAJA). The enviros have made millions from filing lawsuits. Abuse of EAJA is a subject of its own.
I have been heavily involved for the past year against the listing of this bird. The USFWS did not use the “best available science” as required in the ESA. If they list the bird, USFWS will be sued by the states and counties.
Regional Director for Region 2 of USFWS admitted in a meeting with eight NM counties that USFWS population studies of the LPC consisted of different methodologies for the past 14 years and has only been consistent in the last two years. Well, two years of statistically sound population studies do not establish long term trend.
Hunting pressure is not the reason for population declines.
The on-going drought is the reason the LPC population is declining. The drought is also causing mice, snake, antelope,deer, etc populations to decline. And livestock numbers are declining too. In my part of the state, we are in the fourth year of the most severe drought in 125 years of NM history. And when it rains again, wildlife populations will increase. The LPC populations decreased in the drought of the 1930’s and 1950’s and came back when the droughts ended. But you can’t tell a bureaucrat such things; they have an agenda and truth is not part of it.
I’m also involved in the Mexican Wolf fiasco.
All of this is giving me a headache.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.