Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Vikings' Portrays Crucifixion as Normal Church Punishment for Apostates
NewsBusters ^ | April 4, 2014 | P.J. Gladnick

Posted on 04/04/2014 7:19:32 AM PDT by PJ-Comix

Your humble correspondent is a fan of the History Channel show, "Vikings." However, its historical accuracy leaves something to be desired to the extent that a week ago I posted a thread at IMDB, Things I Learned While Watching 'Vikings', which humorously mocked such inaccuracies as well as anachronisms on the show. Along with noticing that Rollo wore L.A. Ink type tattoos, I also took note of a completely unhistorical type of punishment meted out to the apostate monk Athelstan: "The Church punished apostate monks by crucifying them and doing their best to make them appear like Jesus including a crown of thorns and a lance in the side."

As a history buff, I could recall of no instance in which the Church punished apostasy by crucifixion. Well, several websites researched that subject and found it not only to be completely unhistorical but also absurd. A.J. Delgado even contacted a well-known medieval history professor and got this response:

(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: historychannel; thevikings; vikings
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: PJ-Comix

Say what you will,
What I’ve taken from this show is my new Smith and Wesson.
A Battle axe made by the arms company.


21 posted on 04/04/2014 9:17:09 AM PDT by Joe Boucher ((FUBO) obammy lied and lied and lied)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

Jayzus! people, lighten up and enjoy an exciting TV series containing enough realism, plot and good acting to put it into the top ten of all programs watched on Thursday nights.

It is obvious that a good deal of research has gone into the series, nitpicking aside, and before Freepers rail on about the Church not crucifying apostates, be happy that the History Channel isn’t doing a series about the Inquisition or Puritan witch burning or the religious motivations behind the 30 Years War. Believe me, Christian history, like the history of any religion, will net you enough blood, gore and sadism to keep your stomach empty for a month.


22 posted on 04/04/2014 9:23:41 AM PDT by Yollopoliuhqui
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2
Its entertainment not historical fact.

+1. I think the show's producers have achieved a balance between entertainment and historical fact. Let's face it, for the Average Joe, life really sucked back in those days. Famine, pestilence, constant wars, infant mortality @ 50%...makes for great entertainment, doesn't it?

23 posted on 04/04/2014 9:26:31 AM PDT by Night Hides Not (For every Ted Cruz we send to DC, I can endure 2-3 "unviable" candidates that beat incumbents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
Thanks for the info-- Hell, at least they don't have the helmets with the HORNS on them -- like in the commercial that aired DURING the Vikings program last night, for GEICO.

Showed Vikings wearing horned helmets, LOL.

PS: I happen to like the show!! (better than the usual drivel on the History channel, except for Pawn Stars).

Maybe this movie was more accurate??


24 posted on 04/04/2014 9:28:20 AM PDT by Bon of Babble (The dogs bark; the caravan moves on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

You got that EXACTLY right!! (I value DH’s opinion on the women).


25 posted on 04/04/2014 9:28:58 AM PDT by Bon of Babble (The dogs bark; the caravan moves on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

I am of Norwegian ancestry, we females don’t fool around when it comes to male perfidy.

I told DH to carefully watch that scene VERY carefully (rolled it back). Because if he ever decides to cheat...


26 posted on 04/04/2014 9:30:33 AM PDT by Bon of Babble (The dogs bark; the caravan moves on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Yollopoliuhqui

The Puritans were burning witches?

I know that burning alive was common among American Indians, but I don’t think whites were using it.


27 posted on 04/04/2014 10:36:47 AM PDT by ansel12 ((Libertarianism offers the transitory concepts and dialogue to move from conservatism, to liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

“Its entertainment not historical fact.”

Agreed. I call it Viking soap opera.


28 posted on 04/04/2014 10:51:20 AM PDT by chrisinoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

The Puritans were burning witches?

************

In Massachusetts execution was carried out by hanging.

According to this article, hanging was the penalty in England during the Puritan ascendancy as well. An interesting read, but I can’t vouch for its accuracy. “English law with regards to handling witchcraft cases differed from the rest of Europe. Torture was illegal and witches in England were not tried for heresy but for the act of maleficium, or evil deeds, and were not therefore liable to be burned at the stake but hung [sic] instead.”

http://thecargoculte.com/archives/1321


29 posted on 04/04/2014 11:37:29 AM PDT by Psalm 144 (FIGHT! FIGHT! SEVERE CONSERVATIVE AND THE WILD RIGHT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Night Hides Not

I like it that they all look dirty most of the time and their clothes are not spectacular. More realistic of the grimey way life really was.


30 posted on 04/04/2014 12:58:57 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144
I think there were a few burnings in England and maybe more in Scotland, but it was definitely more common on the Continent, Germany in particular.

If you want torture, though, read what happened after the Anabaptist Munster Rebellion was put down.

31 posted on 04/04/2014 1:13:21 PM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: kickstart

Whenever the characters start to get jiggy I cant help but think: “How bad must have the real Vikings smelled?”


32 posted on 04/04/2014 1:17:02 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher
Did someone say "Battle-Axe?"


33 posted on 04/04/2014 1:23:13 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep; Yollopoliuhqui; Psalm 144

The point is, there was no witch burning in America by the Puritans.

In the New World, burning alive was limited to practitioners of Native American religions, who among other victims, also burned witches.

Indians burning witches, that doesn’t get mentioned much.


34 posted on 04/04/2014 1:25:05 PM PDT by ansel12 ((Libertarianism offers the transitory concepts and dialogue to move from conservatism, to liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Superb movie.

Just “Look on the bright side of life...”


35 posted on 04/04/2014 1:34:15 PM PDT by jimt (Fear is the darkroom where negatives are developed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

My understanding is that the idea for the character for Athelstan came after reading two accounts in the sagas and Saxon records of prior priests kidnapped by Vikings, assimilated in their society and that later went raiding with them.
One of them was captured, and crucified for being an apostate, as was written in the records
So it actually happened and they made a movie about it.

What’s the OP complaining about? That it doesnt fit his world view of Christians?


36 posted on 04/04/2014 6:14:39 PM PDT by Toughluck_freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Toughluck_freeper

The claim is what you read, do you have a source that contradicts it?


37 posted on 04/04/2014 10:49:17 PM PDT by ansel12 ((Libertarianism offers the transitory concepts and dialogue to move from conservatism, to liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

Crucifixion? Tempting, but no.


38 posted on 04/04/2014 10:57:58 PM PDT by RichInOC (Jesus is coming back soon...and man, is He ticked off. (I'm trying to keep it clean.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson