Interesting how the FCC and local LEOs zeroed in on this guy and caught him...
To: Timber Rattler
Indeed. DHS does not like people messing with their Police drones.
2 posted on
05/01/2014 3:06:19 PM PDT by
lavaroise
(A well regulated gun being necessary to the state, the rights of the militia shall not be infringed)
To: Timber Rattler
Idiot should have just activated it when he saw a yapper, not leave it transmitting constantly. Never would have been caught.
Now, that is how I would do it, not saying I have, but, but.......it does work.
To: Timber Rattler
I have to think his range was pretty limited if the antenae was inside the vehicle .
4 posted on
05/01/2014 3:09:08 PM PDT by
TurboZamboni
(Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.-JFK)
To: Timber Rattler
Where would one get a cellphone jammer? Ah, you know, just out of curiosity....
5 posted on
05/01/2014 3:09:15 PM PDT by
Veggie Todd
(The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. TJ)
To: Timber Rattler
Still, Humphreys kept on jamming for another year until two county sheriff deputies pulled him over. They were able to confirm his use of the cellphone jammer before they even searched his vehicle and found it behind a seat cover. As they approached his SUV, their two-way radios were disconnected from their dispatcher.
___________________________________________
Humphreys is up Obama Creek here. He better lawyer up and hope he can get those fines reduced.
6 posted on
05/01/2014 3:10:45 PM PDT by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
To: Timber Rattler
I’m not even sure if it would improve people’s driving. The typical cell-phone user who texts and talks while driving would probably just shake the phone, open the back, check the battery, put a new one in—all while continuing to drive.
7 posted on
05/01/2014 3:15:46 PM PDT by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Timber Rattler
8 posted on
05/01/2014 3:16:12 PM PDT by
Paladin2
To: Timber Rattler
"You are cutting off any communication for any type of emergency,'' McKinnon said. You are potentially putting people's lives at risk."
So, did the BLM do similar with cell towers around the Bundy Ranch?
9 posted on
05/01/2014 3:20:00 PM PDT by
Paladin2
To: Timber Rattler
In the meantime when a person is in an emergency trying to get help .....
11 posted on
05/01/2014 3:21:44 PM PDT by
SkyDancer
(I Believe In The Law Until It Intereferes With Justice. And Pay Your Liberty Tax Citizen.)
To: Timber Rattler
I was in Florida for business recently. It seemed every other driver had their cell-phone to their ear.
Cops and Government here in NY have made a big deal about it, and its not seen as often as it once was.
Is it not a ticket-able offense in Florida?
12 posted on
05/01/2014 3:24:48 PM PDT by
PGR88
To: Timber Rattler
They sell these at Wal Marts in Florida?
To: Timber Rattler
When the jammer interferes with a call, the phone addict will then devote even more attention to the phone to try to reestablish the call, and give even less attention to the road.
So, the jammer could very well be the cause of accidents, rather than a way of preventing them.
17 posted on
05/01/2014 3:34:41 PM PDT by
Fresh Wind
(The last remnants of the Old Republic have been swept away.)
To: Timber Rattler
Interesting how the FCC and local LEOs zeroed in on this guy and caught him... Perhaps, but he's nothing but a no-good busybody to begin with. IMHO.
19 posted on
05/01/2014 3:38:32 PM PDT by
BfloGuy
( Even the opponents of Socialism are dominated by socialist ideas.)
To: shibumi; Salamander
Sounds like he was causing chaos for the sake of causing chaos. Eris is pleased.
25 posted on
05/01/2014 4:16:15 PM PDT by
Slings and Arrows
(Richard Warman censors free speech.)
To: Timber Rattler
Any bets he also liked driving the far left lane at or 2 mph below the speed limit to enforce that as well? If they can prove he interfered with anyone’s emergency communications personal or public service he just rack up federal felony counts.
26 posted on
05/01/2014 4:27:57 PM PDT by
cva66snipe
((Two Choices left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgment? Which one say ye?))
To: Timber Rattler
The author wrote
Jamming devices overpower cellphones by transmitting a signal on the same frequency and at a high enough power that the two signals collide and cancel each other out. He needs a basic understanding of radio and physics. A phone receiver will lock on the strongest signal on the cell phone band. Build a transmitter that is only slightly stronger than the cell tower at the point of reception and the cell phone doesn't work. Saying the signals "collide" is just stupid.
29 posted on
05/01/2014 4:36:11 PM PDT by
Ben Mugged
(The number one enemy of liberalism is reality.)
To: Timber Rattler
...and what EXACTLY did he do that was so bad?
32 posted on
05/01/2014 4:55:07 PM PDT by
BobL
To: Timber Rattler
That guy is one sanctimonious, holier-than-thou, prick!
33 posted on
05/01/2014 5:00:16 PM PDT by
WMarshal
(Free citizen, never a subject or a civilian)
To: Timber Rattler
Federal law prohibits importing, marketing, sale, possession or using these types of wireless signal jamming devices, in part because its unsafe for people who need to make 911 calls.You can see just how radically the US Government has departed from the Constitution. The issue for them is "safety" which is the first refuge of tyranny.
The fact is this is a personal property issue. Better to have the cell companies, other drivers affected and other private property holders sue the guy. It should be illegal why?
36 posted on
05/04/2014 2:04:13 PM PDT by
1010RD
(First, Do No Harm)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson