BREAKING! There May Be Enough Invalidated Votes to Overturn Cochran Victory

Gateway Pundit ^ | 6/26/14 | Jim Hoft

[ConservativeMan55]

The Chris McDaniel campaign has identified multiple Mississippi counties in which enough improper ballots have been cast that a legal challenge to the outcome of the election is warranted.

[Viennacon]

The poll workers were working for CONNIE COCHRAN! THIS STINKS!

[zeugma]

All one would have to do is deduct all the votes that are questionable and cast by Democrats.

Really? How would one go about doing that?

Face it, the ciminal parties got away with it again.

You're living in a banana republic. (as are we all) Recognising the problem is the first step in overcoming it.

 

[ducttape45]

Isn’t that in itself grounds for a challenging the votes? Looks like Cochran is trying to hide the evidence.

[Red Steel]

Mark for later read...

They don’t need that many to invalidate out of about 35,000 Dem votes.

[GraceG]

[ Even if there is a new election held, how do you keep dims from voting for Cochran again? ]

One hopes the dirty tactics disenfranchise some of the lever pullers for cockring and they vote for McDaniel this time around.

[ken5050]

Let’s find out if those three are actually ALIVE!!!

[don-o]

There is absolutely no way to determine which candidate got the benefit of the ineligible votes.

Does not matter. Illegal votes were recorded so the accuracy of the tally is up in the air. Complete audit is required.

[cherokee1]

Besides that, in my state, if the county clerks don’t certify their results there is no election and Cockrun wouldn’t be elected to anything. And he wouldn’t have the right to assume he’d won in the meantime. Gotta be some geniousity involved with that plan?

[Cboldt]

-- It seems a safe assumption that it was Cochrane -- but that falls far short of admissible evidence. --

I agree that there is no way to make a claim about any single ballot, but if you have enough of them, then you can let statistics do the work. Cochran got a majority of the votes in that district. Any random sample of ballots that is large enough (1,000 is plenty large) is likley to show the same breakdown, within a few percentage points. If the number of invalid ballots is double the margin of victory, the wrong guy won.

[Biggirl]

God Bless Chris.

[bunster]

Let’s find out of those three are actually ALIVE!!!

LOL

Let’s all call them on the phone and ask for them. report back.

[tacticalogic]

They don’t need that many to invalidate out of about 35,000 Dem votes.

I read they were claiming 25-35,000 black votes. That means the total Dem votes could be much more than that.

[MacMattico]

BOTH should be thrown in jail. If you’re going to vote, know simple voting laws!

I was a Poll Watcher for a Republican campaign a few times. Do these not exist in other states? I’m in NY— each candidate was/is allowed two certified people to be at the polls and keep track of who’s voting and watch the proceedings. We would not have allowed this! In NY! (upstate)

Part of my job was to write down the names of people as they spoke their name and signed in. This way we knew who voted. It also helped because during the day the lists were sent back to “headquarters” and we could call who hadn’t voted and get them out (say please!) and alert us to any shenanigans. We were allowed voter rolls— every registered voter of either party. Both sides were. It was the most fair. I guess that’s why my little section of the state isn’t full Dem!

[Redmen4ever]

Good point. I like it. If the requisite number of illegal votes are identified, the judge should order a new run-off election in which only those who legally voted in the past run-off are allowed to vote. Presumably, Thad will figure out this means there’s no way he can win, and will withdraw.

[Viennacon]

http://www.ancestry.com/1940-census/usa/Mississippi/James-Earl-Hayes_48zhlh

James Earl Hayes, Mississippi

One was born in 1926, the other is 14 years old!

[austinaero]

“This thread provided proof there was election fraud.
Why are you in such a hurry to certify the vote?”

Because apparently the vote has to be certified before McD’s camp can examine the voter rolls and challenge it...

from the article

UPDATE: The Cochran campaign is reportedly asking county clerks not to certify the voting rolls until the last day possible so that the McDaniel people will not be able to look at the rolls and challenge them.”

[zeugma]

That makes the Tuesday ballot of any such voter invalid, regardless of how it was marked. The vote doesn’t move from one candidate’s total to the other’s, but is thrown out.

I don't know about you, but when i vote, my name is not printed on the ballot anywhere.

It's one of the reasons electronic elections (internet based) are hard to do and audit properly. It's not like an ATM, where you identify the person, and the account and can keep the books auditing the transactions. Once the vote is cast, it is anonymous. Guaranteeing anonymity while at the same time, validating that the individual is a legitimate voter is harder to do electronically than you think. Done right, it involves cryptographic blinding protocols.

[Viennacon]

http://www.zabasearch.com/people/sandra+b+haynes/jackson+ms/1781683655

Sandra B Haynes = ILLEGAL VOTER

[tennmountainman]

Yep.

[House Atreides]

“[Even if there is a new election held, how do you keep dims from voting for Cochran again?]...”
************************************************************************

An honest (i.e., non Cochran/Barbour crony) judge would simply decide that the only voters allowed to vote in the new HONEST election would be those who LEGITIMATELY voted in the June 24th runoff. Dims who voted with a DemocRAT ballot on June 3rd but voted in the June 24th runoff with a Republican ballot WOULD NOT BE ALLOWED to vote in the NEW HONEST RUNOFF.