Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. top court rejects Google bid to drop Street View privacy case [illegal Wi-Fi wiretap]
Reuters ^ | June 30, 2014 | BY LAWRENCE HURLEY

Posted on 06/30/2014 10:07:27 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last
To: upchuck

So you don’t care that Google could virtually identify all of the comments you’ve posted on FR back to your Gmail ID? FR runs GoogleAnalytics on every page.


61 posted on 07/01/2014 2:53:35 PM PDT by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: i_robot73

I get the sense that this is from wide open connections. Everybody on your street is smart about it or has a newer router which encourages encryption.


62 posted on 07/01/2014 4:30:55 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind; Jim Robinson

Google Analytics isn’t “SUPPOSED” to be that naughty even though it’s the same firm. It’s “SUPPOSED” to be registering activity statistics so Jim Rob can go look at them later. Oh, during this or that political event, of everything that Google Analytics analyzed, FR shot up to #XX.

It’s just it bugs me that there might be side channels via which Google can deduce more. I went back and checked, and what Google knew about was a car repair garage that I had visited in Maryland, which long ago I had used Google Maps to find. (I had used it to find other places, such as churches I wanted to visit and stores I wanted to shop at, but Google gave no clue it knew about those.) But — my cookies are now long gone and so is my Google stored data. So how did Google know. It is to be curious as a whole cattery.


63 posted on 07/01/2014 4:38:58 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: DB

I don’t necessarily have to trespass to see you leaving your windows open, doors unlocked, putting a spare key under a garden gnome, what times you come and go, where you go, etc. Are you sure you wouldn’t mind if I compiled a database with all of your security information, and published it?


64 posted on 07/01/2014 7:21:14 PM PDT by BykrBayb (Wagglebee, welcome home we missed you! ~ Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb

Well as much as I may not like that, there’s nothing in the law preventing you from doing so.


65 posted on 07/01/2014 8:10:29 PM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind
So you don’t care that Google could virtually identify all of the comments you’ve posted on FR back to your Gmail ID? FR runs GoogleAnalytics on every page.

Anybody, including Google, the NSA, even you, could do that just by looking at my posting history.

I've used Google Analytics before myself. It's a free, anonymous service from Google to help webmasters know more about their visitors. It's harmless. Which is why it is the only tracking service I let Ghostery use. All the others, and there are a bunch, are turned off.

Oh, and every Gmail ID I have is fake. I don't use Gmail.

66 posted on 07/01/2014 9:14:55 PM PDT by upchuck (Everyday, Joe Wilson becomes more correct!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: DB

Sorry, but a ‘random’ packet would only consist of X number of bytes. Hardly a full e-mail, let alone anything else of ‘value’. At least, from the article, it appears they were war-driving...nothing ‘accidental’ in that regards.


67 posted on 07/02/2014 8:20:52 PM PDT by i_robot73 (Give me one example and I will show where gov't is the root of the problem(s).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: i_robot73

Depends on the size of the Email. Typical packets are about 1400 bytes.


68 posted on 07/02/2014 9:00:28 PM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson