Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fog of War in Benghazi Hampered Military Response
Military.com ^ | July 12, 2014 | Donna Cassata and Bradley Klapper

Posted on 07/12/2014 12:12:46 PM PDT by QT3.14

The military might have been able to prevent two of the four U.S. deaths in Benghazi if commanders had known more about the intensity of the sporadic gunfire directed at the CIA installation where Americans had taken refuge and had pressed to get a rescue team there faster, according to senior military leaders.

In closed-door testimony to Congress earlier this year, top military officers said that after the first attack on the main U.S. diplomatic outpost on Sept. 11, 2012, they thought the fighting had subsided and the Americans who had fled to the CIA base about a mile away were safe. In fact, they were facing intermittent small-arms fire and rocket-propelled grenades around midnight and had returned fire. Then the attackers dispersed.

Hours later, at first light, an 11-minute mortar and rocket-propelled grenade attack slammed into the CIA annex, killing security contractors Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty.

(Excerpt) Read more at military.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: benghazi; hillary; military; obama; scandals
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 07/12/2014 12:12:46 PM PDT by QT3.14
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

“Fog of war”? Please. Ridiculous.


2 posted on 07/12/2014 12:15:38 PM PDT by Ray76 (True change requires true change - A Second Party ...or else it's more of the same...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

can anyone give a link where the complete transcripts to the military officers testimony is shown ? Now released , but where ?


3 posted on 07/12/2014 12:15:50 PM PDT by LeoWindhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

ONLY FOG was in the White House... everywhere else was pretty clear..


4 posted on 07/12/2014 12:17:53 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14
OK Clausewitz, now it's REALLY getin deep...
5 posted on 07/12/2014 12:27:28 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -vvv- NO Pity for the LAZY - 86-44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

Yeah, blowing smoke isn’t fog.


6 posted on 07/12/2014 12:29:48 PM PDT by Jacquerie (Take back our republic. Article V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

Fog of judgment and accountability


7 posted on 07/12/2014 12:32:55 PM PDT by drunknsage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

Bull chit and lies. That’s all this is.


8 posted on 07/12/2014 12:37:59 PM PDT by TigersEye ("No man left behind" means something different to 0bama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

“Fog of war”? Please. Ridiculous.


More like the “smoke screen of Obama and Clinton” then the “fog of war”


9 posted on 07/12/2014 12:39:30 PM PDT by rdcbn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

I’m getting really sick of this “fog of war” excuse being used for every screw-up that nobody wants to take responsibility for.


10 posted on 07/12/2014 12:40:31 PM PDT by RaveOn ("No amount of logic can shatter a faith consciously based on a lie." Lamar Keene, "True Believers")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

According to this article, drones can’t see well at night...

I ran this by a contact who has info about such things and he openly began to laugh calling it “ ridiculous and an outright lie”. We have the most advanced weapon systems on earth that can see anywhere, anytime, in any condition yet we are supposed to believe a bit of darkness and gunfire will obscure an advanced reconnaissance platform designed to relay battlefield information in real time.

And one other thing, there is little chance that was a predator. The military calls every drone a predator because the ones in operation are top secret.


11 posted on 07/12/2014 12:42:40 PM PDT by drunknsage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LeoWindhorse

This may be what you’re looking for:

http://armedservices.house.gov/index.cfm/press-releases?ContentRecord_id=17D69AFC-744A-43DA-8BEA-D582975C1277


12 posted on 07/12/2014 1:04:41 PM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

I’m thinking...more like “choom of war”.


13 posted on 07/12/2014 1:14:37 PM PDT by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

I’ve read the first eight transcripts. Here are some highlights for me.
There was an AC-130 in the region. The OPS Admiral didn’t know the capabilities of this Air Force aircraft.
There wasn’t an aircraft carrier in the Mediterranean.
The Air Force made the statement to the OPS people in Germany that it would take 16 hours from notification to get an F-16 from Aviano to Benghazi.
Communications were actually not bad.
One of the facilities in Benghazi had been used by Americans fairly extensively during the fighting to overthrow Qadaffi.
Lots of discussion over what “stand down” means.


14 posted on 07/12/2014 1:20:07 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drunknsage

Can’t see well at night. . .what a bunch of low grade crud.

Sensors are functional using visual (E/O) and infrared.

Some have a special sensor that has a SAR-type of sensor as well.

The UAV’s operating that night had excellent visuals and zooming capability.

EVERYONE in the White House, State Department and Pentagon situation rooms was watching it real-time.

They knew what was happening but yet politics demanded no action.


15 posted on 07/12/2014 1:26:29 PM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

imagine “Fog of War” being used as an excuse under a Republican administration...


16 posted on 07/12/2014 1:27:27 PM PDT by latina4dubya (when i have money i buy books... if i have anything left, i buy 6-inch heels and a bottle of wine...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

“The Air Force made the statement to the OPS people in Germany that it would take 16 hours from notification to get an F-16 from Aviano to Benghazi.”

That would involve putting together a full strike package, not a rapid-reaction show of force.

Around 2-hrs could have had F-16’s overhead doing a show of force passes and a couple of gun-runs.


17 posted on 07/12/2014 1:28:24 PM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

If they had KNOWN MORE about the gunfire..?!

For crying out loud HQ had PERFECT radio comms the whole time and had REAL TIME VIDEO of the scene…!

If that is not far above the average situation awareness afforded HQ for a dynamic tactical situation, then TELL ME WHAT MIGHT BE…?

Maybe they feel they required a PSYCHIC on-scene, or a HobbitEsque all-seeing EYE..?

Maybe HQ required real-time radio with the ATTACKERS…?

THIS IS RIDICULOUS.


18 posted on 07/12/2014 1:43:25 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

I’ve been retired for a while now, and I don’t have all the Field Manuals.
The incident in Benghazi has always looked like a “Raid” to me. That has a specific meaning in the military. I think it was a successful raid for the enemy. It knocked us back on our heels. For you John Boyd fans (I’m one), the enemy got “inside” our OODA Loop. We were reacting to them and never caught up.
We used to talk about three proximities of combat. I think they were “Close”, “Near” and “Far”. It looks to me like everyone was concentrated on the Close battle. Higher headquarters should have looked more at the Near and Far battles.
The most disturbing thing is that there has been no After Action Review to learn from this. That may have been a political decision, but it’s a bad decision.
This fighting and killing and dying is a hard business. Not everyone in the business should be there. Make a mistake at Costco, and sales might be down this month. Make a mistake in the military and lots of good people can get dead.


19 posted on 07/12/2014 1:43:30 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

These two, plus Connie Cass, to whom this piece is attributed are all AP foreign correspondents.

Two of them are Salon contributors.

I perused the article.

It said nothing new since what we have heard “earlier this year”.

Gen Ham says, “with no distractions, etc” could mean admin telling him to not go in, for all we know, for all this hit piece tells us.

It is blaming the military.

If they’re going to do that, I hope whatever’s left of the top brass can decipher, and people reading can decipher, that means the military and whatever obstacles were directed at them from their supervisors.

I hope people can miraculously figure out that an operation of this significance, State Dept people in country, it hardly gets more sensitive than that, that the military does nothing on that level without approval, ad that saving a consulate, evacuating, protecting, is a very simple, deadly, perhaps, but simple operation, at least compared with what the writers here have been ordered to try to tell/sell us.

The military did not fail.

Sean Smith did not in any way fail.

Lord give us a break!


20 posted on 07/12/2014 1:43:44 PM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson