Last conservative out, please turn off the lights.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Look. It’s time. Mexico wants California. Let them have it.
2 posted on
08/30/2014 2:42:36 PM PDT by
Lazamataz
(First we beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I can not think of any reason why law enforcement should be allowed to have any equipment that is forbidden to a regular citizen.
4 posted on
08/30/2014 2:50:26 PM PDT by
Repeal The 17th
(We have met the enemy and he is us.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I said this on a related thread, but bears repeating:
When a Government becomes concerned that it’s civilians are becoming too hard to kill, the people should take acute notice...
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Level IIIa soft body armor is the same, but will also purportedly stop a .44 magnum or an Uzi.Unless I'm confused, Uzis use (most of them) rather anemic cartridges. Certainly a LOT less powerful than a .44.
6 posted on
08/30/2014 3:03:01 PM PDT by
Sherman Logan
(Perception wins most of the battles. Reality wins ALL the wars.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
“This bill will keep military body armor out of the wrong hands,” Honda said. “It would ensure that only select officially sanctioned and politically vetted law enforcement praetorian guard, and criminals survive to prey on the helpless population in a faceoff!”
Fixed it.
8 posted on
08/30/2014 3:12:22 PM PDT by
Darksheare
(Try my coffee! First one's free..... Even robots will kill for it!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
“...assuming Honda can even get it to a vote.”
In Bizarro World every absurd concept comes to the floor for a vote. Eventually it passes and is signed into law by the Governor. You can’t fix stupid.
10 posted on
08/30/2014 3:14:23 PM PDT by
chulaivn66
(Meine antwort ist nein. Ende der Debatte.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
These guys are IDIOTS, and INSANE, and TYRANOUS CONTROL FREAKS!!
15 posted on
08/30/2014 3:27:18 PM PDT by
JSDude1
To: 2ndDivisionVet
When ya see it...
How'd dat happen? Jazz!
17 posted on
08/30/2014 3:29:48 PM PDT by
W.
(Government: Moving at the speed of paper pushers pushing actual paper, until it benefits them)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
We must ban assault body-armor NOW!
18 posted on
08/30/2014 3:31:59 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
("The man who damns money obtained it dishonorably; the man who respects it earned it." --Ayn Rand)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
“We’re talking about body armor that is designed for warfare, designed
to protect against law enforcement ammunitions.” And when the SHTF that's probably who we'll need to protect ourselves from.
To many gung-ho punks in uniforms as it is. Give them stress and they'll be
committing mass murder and getting away with it by just saying "I felt threatened".
No problem, the 500 armor is good and it's affordable. Israel sells great armor also
that can be installed in vehicles.
19 posted on
08/30/2014 3:43:17 PM PDT by
MaxMax
(Pay Attention and you'll be pissed off too! FIRE BOEHNER, NOW!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Does he want us to tattoo little targets on the best places to hit us.
It's like Mason said to Dixon, "You gotta' draw the line somewhere".
To: 2ndDivisionVet
***“We’re talking about body armor that is designed for warfare, designed to protect against law enforcement ammunitions.” ***
Time to dig up my stash of black tipped ammo.
23 posted on
08/30/2014 4:04:45 PM PDT by
Ruy Dias de Bivar
(SOUL BROTHER! This house is not armed! (Signs people thought would protect them in the 1960s))
To: 2ndDivisionVet
24 posted on
08/30/2014 4:10:05 PM PDT by
Ruy Dias de Bivar
(SOUL BROTHER! This house is not armed! (Signs people thought would protect them in the 1960s))
To: 2ndDivisionVet
25 posted on
08/30/2014 4:14:27 PM PDT by
Ruy Dias de Bivar
(SOUL BROTHER! This house is not armed! (Signs people thought would protect them in the 1960s))
To: 2ndDivisionVet
If body armor are outlawed, only outlaws will have body armor.
32 posted on
08/30/2014 4:52:48 PM PDT by
ExCTCitizen
(I'm ExCTCitizen and I approve this reply. If it does offend Libs, I'm NOT sorry...)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
COME AND TAKE IT!
35 posted on
08/30/2014 5:27:42 PM PDT by
Ruy Dias de Bivar
(SOUL BROTHER! This house is not armed! (Signs people thought would protect them in the 1960s))
To: 2ndDivisionVet
only govt thugs can have body armor.
not you lowly targe- i mean unprivileged citizens.
42 posted on
08/30/2014 6:31:06 PM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
They are banning body armor for the wrong people. If the police had to walk around without armor and had to same weapon restrictions as the average law-abiding citizen, they might act with a little more respect for people’s rights and they might be more supportive law-abiding people carrying firearms outside the home.
43 posted on
08/30/2014 6:34:56 PM PDT by
3Fingas
(Sons and Daughters for Freedom and Rededication to the Principles of the U.S. Constitution)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
There is clearly no end of weenies in the US.
Pity.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson