Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: reaganaut1

Should make her popular with Republican members of the Judicial Committee.

Asset forfeiture got big under Bush 41 and has been amped up over the years by “conservative” state governors, mayors, and legislatures.

As long as the cops get more money for more paramilitary toys, they are all for it.

Occasionally someone with some actual principles objects and says it should only happen with convictions, but they get ignored and the State looting continues.

Yet another reason why the GOPe doesn’t really represent its base.


8 posted on 11/25/2014 1:15:04 PM PST by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Regulator

A well thought out, literate post based on conservative principles. You are certainly out of place on this thread! ;)

Thanks for the sanity.


14 posted on 11/25/2014 1:39:39 PM PST by Forgotten Amendments (Peace On Earth! Purity of Essence! McCain/Ripper 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Regulator

Here in Maine, civil asset forfeiture is not used often. There are many hoops for the government to jump through.

In the cases where there is an actual forfeiture, the assets go to the State of Maine’s general fund. Police departments and sheriff’s department do not receive anything, so there is no incentive for them to be aggressive, as is the case in other states.


24 posted on 11/25/2014 4:28:16 PM PST by july4thfreedomfoundation (Amnesty is Obama's Way of Saying "FU" to all those who voted on November 4th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Regulator
Asset forfeiture got big under Bush 41 and has been amped up over the years by “conservative” state governors, mayors, and legislatures.

Indeed it did. President George H W Bush, March 05, 1991 =>

"Asset forfeiture laws allow us to take the ill-gotten gains of drug kingpins and use them to put more cops on the streets and more prosecutors in court.

In the last 5 years alone, the Justice Department shared over half a billion dollars in forfeited assets with State and local law enforcement."

http://bushlibrary.tamu.edu/research/public_papers.php?id=2764&year=1991&month=3

28 posted on 11/25/2014 6:03:54 PM PST by Ken H (What happens on the internet stays on the internet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Regulator

I’ll point this out....it was a law passed by the House and Senate....with plenty of Republicans in support of the law. A number of people said at the time....it would be abused. Well...they were right. Imminent Domain is also abused. There’s a problem here....but the question is...instead of going after Lynch, why not rewrite the whole law and really take it down several notches?


31 posted on 11/25/2014 10:33:51 PM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Regulator

Highway robbery under color of law is just another one of those areas where both wings of the uniparty can come to a mutual agreement. Along with amnesty, increasing prison populations, higher taxes, growing deficits and deathcare.


33 posted on 11/26/2014 7:25:37 AM PST by RKBA Democrat (No flatscreens, no peace!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson