Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pete Sessions Fires Back: I’m Not Pro-Amnesty, I’m Not a ‘Boehner Guy’
breitbart.com ^ | 12/31/14 | Sarah Rumpf

Posted on 12/31/2014 11:54:32 AM PST by cotton1706

In an exclusive interview with Breitbart Texas, Congressman Pete Sessions (R-Texas) pushed back against critics who view Congressional Republican leadership as weak on amnesty, and defended the planned homeland security appropriations bill that will come up for a vote in the new Congress as a strong tactic against President Obama’s unconstitutional executive amnesty orders.

Sessions spoke to Breitbart Texas for nearly an hour, and also shared four letters he wrote to constituents about the legislation earlier this month. He was clearly aware of the criticism leveled against him but was also adamant that the appropriations bill was not pro-amnesty and that it would effectively thwart Obama’s efforts to enact amnesty by executive order. Sessions also did not deny previous comments he has made that drew attacks as being pro-amnesty, but argued that the comments were taken out of context and that the focus right now needed to be on finding a way to pass the appropriations bill.

Chairman of the powerful Rules Committee, Sessions holds significant sway over legislation and has become a target for conservative activists who are frustrated with the Republican leadership under Speaker John Boehner. Sessions did not criticize Boehner directly during our interview, but they have butted heads on at least one key occasion during the past few years, regarding Sessions’ leadership of the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC).

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Politics/Elections; US: Ohio; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: aliens; boehner; elections; johnboehner; ohio; petesessions; rabscuttleredux; speakerjohnboehner; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
Ha! He must be catching hell with his constituents!!
1 posted on 12/31/2014 11:54:32 AM PST by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Too late Jefe!


2 posted on 12/31/2014 11:56:02 AM PST by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

Pete not Jeff


3 posted on 12/31/2014 11:57:14 AM PST by Sybeck1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

He’s not a Boehner guy if he votes against Boehner as Speaker. Same goes for all the frauds who campaigned as constitutional conservatives.


4 posted on 12/31/2014 11:59:46 AM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Rand Paul's immigration speech
...The Republican Party must embrace more legal immigration.

Unfortunately, like many of the major debates in Washington, immigration has become a stalemate-where both sides are imprisoned by their own rhetoric or attachment to sacred cows that prevent the possibility of a balanced solution.

Immigration Reform will not occur until Conservative Republicans, like myself, become part of the solution. I am here today to begin that conversation.

Let's start that conversation by acknowledging we aren't going to deport 12 million illegal immigrants.

If you wish to work, if you wish to live and work in America, then we will find a place for you...

This is where prudence, compassion and thrift all point us toward the same goal: bringing these workers out of the shadows and into being taxpaying members of society.

Imagine 12 million people who are already here coming out of the shadows to become new taxpayers.12 million more people assimilating into society. 12 million more people being productive contributors.
[Posted on 03/19/2013 7:04:07 AM PDT by Perdogg]
Rand Paul calls on conservatives to embrace immigration reform
Latinos, should be a natural constituency for the party, Paul argued, but "Republicans have pushed them away with harsh rhetoric over immigration." ...he would create a bipartisan panel to determine how many visas should be granted for workers already in the United States and those who might follow... [and the buried lead] "Imagine 12 million people who are already here coming out of the shadows to become new taxpayers...
[Posted on 04/21/2013 1:52:42 PM PDT by SoConPubbie]
[but he's not in favor of amnesty, snicker, definition of is is]

5 posted on 12/31/2014 12:01:00 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1

Jefe, not Jeff.
Spanish, means “boss”/ “leader”.
Meant sarcastically it’s akin to saying “Sure thing boss.”


6 posted on 12/31/2014 12:02:55 PM PST by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

ok


7 posted on 12/31/2014 12:04:39 PM PST by Sybeck1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1

Which one do we like?


8 posted on 12/31/2014 12:06:54 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1

Let’s not confuse him with my great Senator Jeff Sessions, who I guarantee is neither pro-amnesty nor pro-Boehner. Especially not after all the mail I have sent him on both topics.


9 posted on 12/31/2014 12:07:31 PM PST by TonyM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

He should apologize for things that never happened and half FR will support him.


10 posted on 12/31/2014 12:09:32 PM PST by Norm Lenhart (1`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Remember this guy, Pete sessions, is from Texas, by remembering to beware, not all congress people from Texas are conservative. Look at cornyn. Pete sessions R from Texas is like cornyn. He is consistently just as awful


11 posted on 12/31/2014 12:19:47 PM PST by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: stanne

Pete bad, Jeff good. Right? I like the KISS principle.


12 posted on 12/31/2014 12:21:05 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706; a fool in paradise

This guy is attached to the left cheek of Boehner’s butt


13 posted on 12/31/2014 12:23:04 PM PST by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

He’s a liar. I told my own congresscritter to pound sand after his disgraceful vote FOR the rule, then against the rule.


14 posted on 12/31/2014 12:24:33 PM PST by zeugma (The act of observing disturbs the observed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zeugma
FOR the rule, then against the rule bill.

 

15 posted on 12/31/2014 12:25:16 PM PST by zeugma (The act of observing disturbs the observed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: central_va

In the KISS rule, Jeff good Pete bad


16 posted on 12/31/2014 12:28:53 PM PST by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Pete in all actuality is a Florida resident, thanks to his new bride. In 2015, he’ll spend as much time in Texas as Pat Roberts will spend in Iowa.


17 posted on 12/31/2014 12:29:26 PM PST by Night Hides Not (Remember the Alamo! Remember Goliad! Remember Mississippi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

The Republicans need to be told in no uncertain terms that if they vote in a way that supports Obama’s lawless actions regarding immigration, if they dare vote for amnesty, their fate will assuredly be the same as all those Democrats who voted for Obamacare .... GONE. They WILL be voted out or forced to not seek re-election/resign.


18 posted on 12/31/2014 12:43:52 PM PST by Qiviut ( One of the most delightful things about a garden is the anticipation it provides. ~W.E. Johns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

If true he probably wouldn’t be in his current position. He is most likely allowed by Boner to go off the reservation as long as he doesn’t directly criticize Boner.

Which he did not.

Kind of like running your own strawman to prove you don’t have it in for whoever the strawman is supposed to represent.

I hate the rino/gop-e bs that they expect us to believe, lying to our faces and faking outrage when we don’t buy the lies.


19 posted on 12/31/2014 12:45:12 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Liar.


20 posted on 12/31/2014 1:07:29 PM PST by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson