Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Clinton: ‘I want the public to see my email’
PMS-NBC.com ^ | 03/05/2015 | Alex Seitz-Wald

Posted on 03/05/2015 5:51:08 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum

Bullcrap.

Remember the big “Where’s Hillary?” push over the last couple of weeks?

Now we know where Hillary has been for the past month. She got a tip that people were snooping around, and when word hit what they were looking for, the Clintons went into bunker mode.

They’ve been reviewing that server’s contents for the past 6 weeks...deciding what can and can’t be released, flipping bad news to the damage control team, coordinating responses with the Clinton Foundation...


21 posted on 03/05/2015 6:03:08 AM PST by ameribbean expat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

...witch is exactly why I set up a secret account and hid them!


22 posted on 03/05/2015 6:06:09 AM PST by null and void ( If race doesn't matter, why does it matter so much?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

So, Mrs. Clinton, what were you thinking when you chose not to use the State Department e-mail system? Were you thinking, “Gee, having my own server will make it easier for me to share my e-mails with the public”? Sorry, we’re not buying it.


23 posted on 03/05/2015 6:08:30 AM PST by stranger and pilgrim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
I was just joking around with a buddy at work, making fun of the Clintons. I had one of the those moments trying be absurd and realized that it isn't absurd. I said, "Like the definition of "is" is (pause) the emails were on a state dept. email server. The state dept paid for the server. It was at a remote site, your honor. It wasn't a private email server."

Technically speaking they could make this argument since every large business and government agency with multiple locations have remote sites, sometimes with just a server or two (usually domain controllers and file/print servers - not email servers). The question is did the state dept. pay for the server. If there is a payment for it on an expense report, then technically they did, even if the original payment came of Hillary's own pocket. Leave it to the Clintons to twist stuff around when everyone knows their true intent.

24 posted on 03/05/2015 6:08:57 AM PST by ConservativeInPA (#JuSuisCharlesMartel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

NBC is carrying this lie for her? What a surprise...not.


25 posted on 03/05/2015 6:11:52 AM PST by GOPJ (Comrade Thug - please don't hurt me for disagreeing... I lived in a free country once..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
This is a red herring. A stalling tactic. Once again the public is supposed to be stupid.

State Department knew she was using her own server and did not stop it. They have no control over her server. They knew official business was being run out of their control and oversight(on a private unsecured server) and did not put an end to it(and nobody is laying out why this was dangerous and possibly treasonous). That server needs to be turned over to Congress to see what has been tampered with from the source then turned over to the State Department period, since it ran official business on it. It needs to be confiscated pronto.

The Clintons' lost privacy rights to anything on that server once they ran official State Department emails through it.

26 posted on 03/05/2015 6:13:05 AM PST by Lady Heron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I want to see her ample backside disappearing over the horizon. I’ll be happy when she is hull down.


27 posted on 03/05/2015 6:14:25 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Total unadulterated BS.

She willfully violated the Federal Records Act. The only intent in doing that is to hide official correspondence.


28 posted on 03/05/2015 6:14:36 AM PST by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

‘I want the public to see my email’, lied the Hillary.


29 posted on 03/05/2015 6:14:47 AM PST by kiryandil (making the jests that some FReepers aren't allowed to...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedMDer

That’s the only thing that would impress me. A huge phalanx of black FBI SUVs arriving on her property with lights flashing disgorging a swarm of agents who forcibly remove the servers under court order to prevent evidence tampering. Anything less is tolerance of this gangster regime and Kabuki theater for the gullible hoi polloi.


30 posted on 03/05/2015 6:15:45 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom (For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do not, no explanation is possible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke
Well, one more question: Exactly what, Mrs. Clinton, would have happened to some mid-level, GS-12, state department employee who did the same thing? Do you think that would have been fair?

Laws are for the little people.

31 posted on 03/05/2015 6:16:33 AM PST by kiryandil (making the jests that some FReepers aren't allowed to...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I know Hillary thinks she’s our queen, but she was our employee when she was Secretary Of State. I’m sorry, but employees have to follow the rules. This isn’t above the boards public behavior by our employee. She has always, always, acted like she can do whatever she wants to do. She is not a queen, and she is certainly not my queen. She needs to shut her booze-hole unless she’s apologizing to the American People.


32 posted on 03/05/2015 6:18:10 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Hillary Clinton: ‘I want the public to see my email’

Yeah, after she's had more than two years to sanitize it.

33 posted on 03/05/2015 6:18:57 AM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

I don’t trust anything she turns over. The fact she had a private server for her official communications tells me she didn’t ever want those communications seen. Not then, certainly not now. She never had any credibility with me (or anyone who knew her for that matter). Maybe the American people will realize this and turn away from her.

But I don’t like the timing of this. It would have been better after she’d won the democrat nomination. Now we will get Liawatha, who also lives in the shadows, but doesn’t have grifter money and a private server. Liawatha is a communist like Shrilery, but without the baggage.


34 posted on 03/05/2015 6:20:02 AM PST by henkster (Do I really need a sarcasm tag?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I want the public to see my email

In Clinton speak this means just one email.


35 posted on 03/05/2015 6:21:07 AM PST by McGruff (Maybe my comments were too nuanced for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
"I want the public to see my email."

"Well, such of those emails as I deign to let State have access to in the first place."

36 posted on 03/05/2015 6:25:46 AM PST by Paine in the Neck (Socialism consumes EVERYTHING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blackdog

“I asked State to release them. They said they will review them for release as soon as possible,”

If the email is on her server, can the State release them? (I don’t know zip about this stuff).


37 posted on 03/05/2015 6:26:11 AM PST by fivecatsandadog ("Islam is Islam. There are no modifiers. It's a political movement masquerading as a religion.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

The klintoon criminal family cares about little. They have over $2,000,000,000.00 in their “foundation. May Justice find them all.


38 posted on 03/05/2015 6:27:01 AM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Lady Heron

Won’t Kerry whitewash everything? They’re (Dems) all in the same s(t)inking boat.


39 posted on 03/05/2015 6:29:28 AM PST by fivecatsandadog ("Islam is Islam. There are no modifiers. It's a political movement masquerading as a religion.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

Almost forgot about that. Some of her aides are paid from campaign dollars and should never have had access to certain information when she was a senator. But she only got the threat of a wrist slap then.


40 posted on 03/05/2015 6:31:34 AM PST by Hillarys Gate Cult (Liberals make unrealistic demands on reality and reality doesn't oblige them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson