Posted on 03/10/2015 10:01:37 AM PDT by nickcarraway
SAE fraternity should considering suing the university and it's president, for violation of their civil rights under the US Constitution. Someone needs to start standing up to and defending our rights in this country. This is as good a time and place to start as any.
Some of the members have been expelled. I am not sure how you can expel someone simply for vulgar or racist speech,particularly from a public institution. Racism and racist speech are not illegal. They may be stupid, but voting Democrat is stupid and it is also legal, even for the dead.
After all several people who are felons are allowed to remain in school while being tried or even allowed to return to school while they are on parole. Parole is punishment other than prison.
It seems to me a case can be made that the University is infringing on the students first amendment rights. No different than if they held a vigil against the Afghan War.
“Who owns the house? If it is property of the University, then they have the right to shutter the building. However, if it is NOT university property...”
SAE probably owns the house. That’s not always the case, but it tends to be the case at big universities. Regardless, SAE announced that they were shutting down the OU chapter before the University announced that they were severing ties with the fraternity.
I disapprove of their idiocy, but would deal with it by telling them their being idiots.
and the P.O.S, potUS, you are nothing but an oxygen thief, go back to tweeting & posting pics of your lunch on instagram
If teachers at Oklahoma University were teaching that Christianity and Judaism were inferior religion and the U.S. should be under sharia law, would you think that they should be allowed to because of the First Amendment?
The government doesn't say they can't say those things, but it doesn't mean they can say it in class. It doesn't mean they will not have nongovernmental repercussions.
OU is a public school, and sanctions applied by it are considered to be governmental in nature and therefore fall under the auspices of the First Amendment.
And there are a good number of SCOTUS judgements that set precedent for this.
So you are admitting that public schools can teach jihad, sharia, and that Judaism and Christianity are evil.
A lot of those precedence are just plain wrong.
Thats a different subject.
What state schools can’t do is abridge the freedom of students who do say those things. Particularly outside of class, (and within some limitations, so long as they don’t constitute a direct threat for instance).
For example, a kid can stand up outside the student union and sing ISIS’s praises. He can deny the holocaust, demand the destruction of Israel and any number of other repugnant things.
That student can’t, however, point to another student and say “and you’re next”. Thats a direct threat, not protected.
But this fraternity is not a professor or employed by the university. Big difference I would think.
Freedom of speech evidently doesn’t apply to racial matters.
I honestly did not know that!
The trash talk in most Rap “music” is allowed, and it is far worse than SAE chants, because the speakers are black...!
So what I really did not know is that there is a “white First Amendment” and also a “black First Amendment.”
The First Amendment is not a “bitch”, it is irrelevant.
They, as private individuals, were free to chant what they want. Sigma Alpha Epsilon, and a private organization, were free to kick them out for it. The University of Oklahoma, as owners of a frat house that was no longer associated with the school, was free to expel them. It's a very free society.
Ask Sgt. Foley what he thinks of Oklahoma.
Those SAE guys were definitely not the sharpest tools in the shed. I was in a fraternity my last year in college in the 60's and we had a couple of off-color beer drinking songs but nothing close to the rant they chanted on the bus. But young college guys are known for exhibiting stupid behavior and this is another prime example. Immature guys with some beer in them are likely to step on their di*ks more than once before they grow up. Not right and don't approve, but it is the way it is.
Since no one was arrested, I don't see any problem here..........
OK, hold on a second, let me look at my pocket constitution regarding the First Amendment.........Hmmmm, looking......
OK, here it is:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peacefully to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
I might be wrong but that Freedom of Speech thing seems to protect the individual from the government.
I don't read anything in there that protects a bunch of racist frat boys from being punished for their publicized video of a racist chant......
Here, let's review their chant........
Song to the tune of : If You Are Happy and You Know It
There will never be a nigger in SAE
There will never be a nigger in SAE
You can hang them from a tree but he can never sign with me
There will never be a nigger in SAE
And that's acceptable to you?
Actions have consequences. As they found out.
Uncle Tom?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.