Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

--more of the Jenner blather from a Trib chatterer---
1 posted on 06/09/2015 4:25:02 AM PDT by rellimpank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: rellimpank

“the woman who used to be Bruce Jenner”

Wrong!


2 posted on 06/09/2015 4:27:10 AM PDT by caver (Obama: Home of the Whopper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

A crossdressing male is not normal.

Leftists always reject God and His absolutes of right & wrong.

To leftists, “normal” is relative and situational.


3 posted on 06/09/2015 4:29:42 AM PDT by newfreep ("Evil succeeds when good men do nothting" - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

So, Clarence....did you ever go to church with Bill Clinton? How about Al Sharpton, or Jesse Jackson? How about Calypso Louie?


5 posted on 06/09/2015 4:29:51 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

Caitlyn Jenner is not a woman. Check the chromosomes.

Also, women don’t have a penis.

#BasicBiologyFail


6 posted on 06/09/2015 4:30:19 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Funny how Hollywood's 'No Nukes' crowd has been silent during Obama's Iranian nuclear negotiations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank
Well, I'm probably not “normal” either, but I know mental illness when I see it.
7 posted on 06/09/2015 4:30:29 AM PDT by 2111USMC (Aim Small Miss Small)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

10,000 people calling a cow a horse won’t make it so.


12 posted on 06/09/2015 4:33:46 AM PDT by Flag_This (You can't spell "treason" without the "O".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

Whether Bruce, or whether Caitlyn, the proper term seems to be “the defendant”.


13 posted on 06/09/2015 4:34:34 AM PDT by BlackAdderess ("Give me a but a firm spot on which to stand, and I shall move the earth". --Archimedes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

https://www.facebook.com/JTTOTS26R/photos/a.334117273446353.1073741828.324824931042254/392599097598170/?type=1&theater

I am HTML challenged this am. Can’t get it to post on FR.


14 posted on 06/09/2015 4:37:31 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

The best way to get attention is to write a column about Rush......I hope Rush ignores him.


15 posted on 06/09/2015 4:37:58 AM PDT by Hot Tabasco (War IS the answer! Peace activists never liberated anything or anyone....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank; All

—have notified the admin—author is Leonard Pitts, not Clarence Page-—my apologies—


16 posted on 06/09/2015 4:38:38 AM PDT by rellimpank (--don't believe anything the media or government says about firearms or explosives--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

No wonder she is so confused. Look where she learned about Jesus. I didn’t bother to go on and discover what she learned and I doubt that she did, either. I suspect that what she learned was Jesus can be the white version of “The Race Card”. “In trouble, need help? Just throw down your Jesus card and Voila, Saved”. (It is sort of like this “period, end parentheses thing on this bloody IPad. You just can NOT get it to work the way it is supposed to. So we have to pretend that “. is right even though we all know it is not. It ain’t right but it works so just move on.)


19 posted on 06/09/2015 4:41:48 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

It is not Jesus whom Clarence should be referencing...Clarence is more closely following satan on this.


21 posted on 06/09/2015 4:45:55 AM PDT by Wpin ("I Have Sworn Upon the Altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank
To conservatives, "male" means XY-chromosomes in the DNA. To us, an athlete competing as a woman but with XY genetics is cheating. An XY-genetics person looking for companionship wearing a dress is male - and a liar and a pervert - no matter how he feels about being male. "Male" often means more muscle mass, more upper-body strength, proportionately larger lungs, different hip structure, larger Adam's apple, and various other differences in anatomy, but it always means XY genetics. "Male" includes both masculine and sissy, and it is an immutable genetic fact.

To liberals, "male" has become yet another flexible word that means whatever they want it to mean at that moment. "Male" describes actions and feelings, so many of the most attractive girls I've known in real life and seen on TV/movies - tomboys - were what liberals would call "male". To them, my prom date was "male" most of the day, as we crawled through mud catching crawdads, and then she became female as she showered (I missed that transition, obviously), fixed her hair and nails for hours, and dressed up in a beautiful and feminine but practical dress. The next day, they would see her as "male" again as we went shooting.

I'm not sure whether liberals are crazy, like Humpty Dumpty, evil like Big Brother's enforcers in 1984, or both, but they are double plus ungood for our children. Only a fool allows leftists to have access to the innocent.

24 posted on 06/09/2015 4:49:25 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

Jenner’s actions are not a matter of normal or not-normal. Call it what it is: SIN.

We Christians (probably Limbaugh included) recognize we are sinners and ask for mercy.

Jenner and the rest of the LGBT movement proclaim their sin as good, and teach others to sin also.

We can’t and don’t argue over what is “normal”. We can only pray for them, and for ourselves, because eternal souls are in the balance here.


25 posted on 06/09/2015 4:50:15 AM PDT by ReaganGeneration2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

This article’s author isn’t Clarence Page, it’s Leonard Pitts Jr.


26 posted on 06/09/2015 4:50:28 AM PDT by CaptainK (...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

To respond to Claire/Leonard’s ‘point’ that Rush Limbaugh is not “normal”, Rush would likely agree.

He calls company EXCELLENCE in broadcasting, not mediocrity in broadcasting. He worked in different trades before striking gold in talk radio.

If you want to look for “average” (being a young Japanese girl in Tokyo, I suppose based on population density of the world and age demographics) that is something else.

But if you sum up shared beliefs, shared life accomplishments, etc. then you might be more on track to what Rush was discussing. Being an Olympic medal winner is NOT normal, but it is not immoral or aberrant psychology.


30 posted on 06/09/2015 4:56:19 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Funny how Hollywood's 'No Nukes' crowd has been silent during Obama's Iranian nuclear negotiations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

Alright, I confess. I clicked the link. I HAD to because that teaser that claimed she was going to apply principles made me intolerably curious. I just HAD to see if a libtard could do it, knowing that if one has no principles it would be on the order of Aegean Stables kind of thing. Waste of time. She couldn’t. Expecting a libtard to apply logic is “expecting what never has been or will ever be”.


31 posted on 06/09/2015 4:57:47 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

Tribune circling the drain, Clarence has a contract coming due.

Nothing more.


33 posted on 06/09/2015 5:03:08 AM PDT by IncPen (Not one single patriot in Washington, DC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

Is it “normal” to call a guy, with the balls and bat that God gave him still firmly attached, a “woman”. If so, I am not normal either.


35 posted on 06/09/2015 5:10:16 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

A perv is a perv is a perv!


36 posted on 06/09/2015 5:13:56 AM PDT by kenmcg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson