Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poll: Neck-And-Neck 2016 Races in Iowa, New Hampshire (Cruz leads Iowa, Trump leads NH)
NBC News ^ | 1/10/16 | MARK MURRAY

Posted on 01/10/2016 6:18:17 AM PST by jimbo123

Three weeks until the first presidential nominating contest, Donald Trump and Ted Cruz are running neck and neck in Iowa, while Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders are also locked in a tight race in the Hawkeye State.

What's more, Clinton and Sanders are within the margin of error in New Hampshire, while Trump has built a 16-point lead in the same state.

Those are the results of two brand-new NBC News/Wall Street Journal/Marist polls - the first NBC/WSJ/Marist early-state surveys of 2016, which for the first time measure likely voters.

In Iowa, which holds its caucuses on Feb. 1, Ted Cruz leads Donald Trump by four points among likely caucus-goers, 28 percent to 24 percent - within the poll's margin of error of plus-minus 4.6 percentage points.

They're followed by Marco Rubio at 13 percent and Ben Carson at 11 percent. No other Republican candidate gets more than 5 percent of the vote.

Yet among the larger universe of potential Iowa caucus-goers, Trump actually leads Cruz by two points, 26 percent to 24 percent, suggesting that a larger turnout could benefit Trump in the state.

-snip-

In New Hampshire, which holds its presidential primaries on Feb. 9, Trump gets support from 30 percent of likely Republican primary voters. He's followed by Marco Rubio at 14 percent, Chris Christie at 12 percent, Ted Cruz at 10 percent, and John Kasich and Jeb Bush tied at 9 percent each.

(Excerpt) Read more at nbcnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cruz; elections; immigration; polls; trump; trumpwasright
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 01/10/2016 6:18:17 AM PST by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

So much for Hillary’s invincibility. She’s struggling in Iowa and New Hampshire.


2 posted on 01/10/2016 6:21:07 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Iowa is neck an neck, but Trump is ahead by a mile in New Hampshire.


3 posted on 01/10/2016 6:22:07 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (You can't spell Hillary without using the letters L, I, A, & R)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
Trump and Cruz need to go after Rubio.
4 posted on 01/10/2016 6:22:12 AM PST by TornadoAlley3 (Obama is everything Oklahoma is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

It’s more fun to let John Ellis Bush go after Rubio. He’ll do it if his advisers tell him to.


5 posted on 01/10/2016 6:24:46 AM PST by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Bill Clinton’s WINO is going to get her oversized butt kicked in New Hampshire for sure. Now it looks like she is going to get licked in Iowa too. And I don’t mean by Huma.


6 posted on 01/10/2016 6:25:29 AM PST by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana

Jeb has been savaging Rubio. He cannot afford to finish dead last in New Hampshire.

Its Do Or Die Time.


7 posted on 01/10/2016 6:26:35 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

If Trump wins Iowa...


8 posted on 01/10/2016 6:27:12 AM PST by Awgie (truth is always stranger than fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
--Yet among the larger universe of potential Iowa caucus-goers, Trump actually leads Cruz by two points, 26 percent to 24 percent, suggesting that a larger turnout could benefit Trump in the state.--

You can imagine the writers pain as he typed out these words. OMG-but-but-but-how can this be?

9 posted on 01/10/2016 6:34:41 AM PST by JPG (What's the difference between the Rats and the GOPe? Nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS; SamAdams76; Jane Long; RoosterRedux; DoughtyOne

I think it’s clear that Cruz has a small but persistent lead over Trump in Iowa, but it seems Ted has stalled there and Trump is inching back up. It will be as it always was predicted...turnout. If Trump can bring even a portion of his rally attendance to the caucus, we may be in for a big surprise on election night. Trump needs to turn back to immigration and jobs this week. News reports out how Obama Syrian refugees were arrested for terrorism and the stock market and Chinese market messes are tailor made for him. Nobody on the playing field except for Trump can speak with authority on thise issues now.


10 posted on 01/10/2016 6:36:41 AM PST by usafa92 (Conservative in Jersey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Awgie

“......the larger universe of potential Iowa caucus-goers.........”

Who picks them?


11 posted on 01/10/2016 6:36:52 AM PST by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DaveA37

My previous question.......”Who Picks Them?”......

“......state laws determine how electors are chosen, they are generally selected by the political party committees within the states.”.........

So, What is the criteria in Iowa?


12 posted on 01/10/2016 6:42:27 AM PST by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: usafa92
The possibility of a much larger turnout is what everybody is missing. Normally the turnout among Republicans at this caucus is very low. This has been a blue state 6 of the last 7 elections. Eighty percent of Republicans in Iowa stayed home in 2012. Only the evangelicals seem to get excited about this and even so, they were only able to deliver the narrowest of victories to Santorum in 2012. Only 38 votes separated Santorum from 2nd place Romney and statewide, Santorum had less than 30,000 votes.

Trump has had tens of thousands of people at his Iowa rallies and Cruz has also drawn some crowds. Compare that to four years ago when the candidates basically hung out at hardware stores and coffee shops in their flannel shirts.

So I think we are going to see a huge turnout this time around. Both Trump and Cruz will do very well. I do think Trump wins by a substantial margin. The really positive thing to come out of this is that GOPe candidates are going to get destroyed. Also, I'd like to see Bernie Sanders whip Bill Clinton's WINO.

13 posted on 01/10/2016 6:44:29 AM PST by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: usafa92

Remember what Trump repeatedly says about not having his generals project their actions

This is the most detailed on His ground game in Iowa. Only things found recently and hypotheses and conjecture

http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/trumps-ground-game-iowa-soaring-aides-say


14 posted on 01/10/2016 6:46:56 AM PST by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

It may be wishful thinking, but I predict Trump will win Iowa with 38 percent of the vote.


15 posted on 01/10/2016 6:47:20 AM PST by euram
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: euram

Are you in Iowa? The whole thing seems so strange to us not there. I’m wondering if Trump will pull it off with some unbelievable ground game on caucus day.


16 posted on 01/10/2016 7:05:00 AM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

I think your analysis is quite correct and very logical. The question arises whether the Trump campaign can bring out all the supporters on a very cold evening of Feb 1, spend a few hours, register? and vote for Trump. Tough task ahead, maybe give them some incentives, lots of pizzas and free catering? If the turnout is low, Alas!!; something is not right and DT may lose?


17 posted on 01/10/2016 7:12:02 AM PST by kpm1119
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: grania

There’s no ‘unbelievable ground game’ in Iowa. Cruz and Trump both have the best grass roots turnout operations in the business.

A big Trump win would indicate Trump’s appeal isn’t just celebrity. A Cruz win would be a more conventional turnout.

Modest numbers for Trump or Cruz, even if they ‘win’, could open the door for Rubio or Christie should one or both outperform expectations.

Bad weather discourages newbies, which could sink Trump.

That’s why there’s a real process and projections and opinion polls don’t really matter.


18 posted on 01/10/2016 7:17:34 AM PST by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
The last NBC/Marist poll I can find at RCP had Cruz at 4% and Trump at 29%. And was in September. What a huge change there has been since then.

www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/ia/iowa_republican_presidential_caucus-3194.html#polls

19 posted on 01/10/2016 7:41:05 AM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: euram

If that happens, America will be Great Again and be free from planted Muslim journalists in rallies, proxy and fraud evangelicals, candidates who are puppets in the hands of their donors and lack strength, leadership, the courage to speak the truth and vision. Only the morally strong and God-blessed people will have the courage of conviction to openly say and do what they believe is the truth and God’s commands.


20 posted on 01/10/2016 7:43:51 AM PST by kpm1119
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson