DNC changes date on campaign contribution to subvert campaign finance laws.

Reddit r/politics ^ | Redditors /u/Trumpicana and /u/bananawhom

[John Robinson]

Correct the Record is trying to bury this. Thought I'd share it where they can't touch.

[Diogenesis]

Lois Lerner taught the DNC and Issa/GOP how to
backdate criminal papers to avoid exposure.

Issa and the GOP loved it and let her go,
then Boehner gave Cumming and Issa an award for
helping cover up such massive corruption.

The GOP is criminally complicit to ALL of these
crimes by allowing them. Comey, too.

[John Robinson]

Wow, the post was deleted.

[Robert A Cook PE]

The demo’s used an (overseas-enabling) on-line credit card billing process that did NOT require verification of the card (date and serial number), nor name and address - since the donation “system” limited the amount to less than what the receiving political organization needed to report.

[apillar]

Hey, under Democrat rules, I’ve never donated to Trump until this year, I’m 42, so I can donate $113,400 to his campaign, ($2,700 personal limit, plus my “debt” of $110,700 for the other 41 years I did not donate multiplied by $2,700 !

[John Robinson]

Always honorable to repay one’s “debts.”

[dontreadthis]

forward to Trump campaign

[SandRat]

Typical behavior for them. DNC changes date on campaign contribution to subvert campaign finance laws.

[PGalt]

Great posts. Thanks.

UNIPARTY - TREASON - continuous, pre-meditated, in-your-face, agenda-driven, agency-abetted, representative-enabled, media-complicit, court-sanctioned, ongoing…

“Everything about socialism is sham and affectation.” - 23.11 Ch23; Economic Harmonies; Frederic Bastiat

DEPOPULATE UNIPARTY socialists, collectivists, criminals, liars, deceivers, scumbags and their enablers from the body politic.

It’s easy to -

live -free - republic

C’mon November

[mj1234]

Darn!

please do NOT give the Demons any MORE criminal ideas!

LOL/sarc

[SelmaLee]

Not surprised, as it was a negative story about the DNC/Hillary.

Spez (or someone else moderating) at Reddit has been on a deletion spree over there.

[rawcatslyentist]

Hussein changed the date on his SS postal stamp.

Laws are for peasants, not rulers.

[HiTech RedNeck]

So it’s possible to average maximum donations over a certain period of years. This would be a matter of internal revenue code. But I’m surprised to see the allegation that $30,000+ can be parlayed that way into a million plus dollar donation. That would need something like a 30+ year window. Is that in the internal revenue code? When I carried over the deduction of a large donation to a 401(c)(3) charity many years ago, I got 5 years maximum to do it in.

[cashless]

Umm...in your exuberance to donate +$100K to DJT campaign, you overlooked one little, teeny, tiny step. You would had to contributed an amount less than the max each of those years and had it listed as “debt”. Then you could “make up the difference” this year. You can't be much different than me in a) Really don't have that kind of money to throw around b)my parent's never had that kind of money or foresight to act in my name on my behalf for the first 18 years of my life and c) would you honestly have contributed money to the #DopesAtGOPe ?

[pieceofthepuzzle]

Politicians are the robber barons of our time, and until and unless we enact very strong counter-measures and limitations on them, they will continue to suck freedom out of America - while enriching themselves. They control the message (media, entertainment, pop-culture, etc.), are trying to control the means of dissemination of information (e.g. the internet), and have been caught many, many times using government power to cover their tracks and to punish those who dare challenge them.

[Sgt_Schultze]

Don’t you think since there is a look-back period, there is likely a carry-forward period, whereby you should be able to prepay the next seven years of donations today?

[Lurker]

I’m sure the FEC will get right on this.

L

[edwinland]

I don’t think “the debt” she is referring to is that person’s debt for undonated amounts, rather, I think it’s the DNC’s debts leftover from 2012, for a few different reasons:

1. she would have said “his debt” instead of “the debt”

2. it would be strange if this donor maxed out contributions to the DNC in off years 2013-2015 but didn’t max out in a general election year.

My guess is that the DNC carried debt from 2012 and at least in their view, you can donate to pay off that debt today and it counts against your limits in the year the debt was incurred. Then you can also max out this year. But my further guess is that you have to intend to do that, and the DNC just saying that’s what you intended may be a problem for them.

[Gritty]

What else does one expect from criminal accountants?

[Chgogal]

BFL