Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can Americans Overthrow The Evil That Rules Them?
paulcraigroberts.org ^ | 08/29/2016 | Paul Craig Roberts

Posted on 09/01/2016 10:26:59 AM PDT by Weeble

Can Americans Overthrow The Evil That Rules Them?

Paul Craig Roberts

Paul Wolfowitz and the lies that he told in the high government positions that he held are responsible for a massive number of deaths and massive destruction in seven countries. Wolfowitz has announced his vote for Hillary Clinton. Does this make you feel reassured?

The real surprise would have been Wolfowitz’s announcement in favor of Donald Trump. So why was what was expected news?

Trump has said that he doesn’t see any future in the conflict Washington has initiated with Russia, and Trump questions the point of NATO’s continuing existence. These peaceful attitudes make Trump into a “national security risk” according to Wolfowitz. What Wolfowitz means is that a peace candidate is a threat to Wolfowitz’s doctrine of US world hegemony. In the crazed mind of Wolfowitz and the neoconservatives, America is not safe unless it rules the world.

Hillary is a warmonger, perhaps the ultimate and last one if she becomes president, as the combination of her hubris and incompetence is likely to result in World War 3. On July 3, 2015, Hillary declared: “I want the Iranians to know that if I’m president, we will attack Iran. . . . we would be able to totally obliterate them.” http://www.globalresearch.ca/hillary-clinton-if-im-president-we-will-attack-iran/5460484?print=1 The crazed Hillary went on from this to declare the President of Russia to be “the new Hitler.” Little doubt she thinks she can obliterate Russia also.

Hillary is the one who brought zionist neocon Victoria Nuland into the State Department to oversee the US coup in Ukraine in order to create more propaganda against Russia and force Washington’s European vassals to impose sanctions and place military bases on Russia’s borders, thus provoking a nuclear power and raising dangerous tensions.

This fits in perfectly with Wolfowitz’s intention. As Wolfowitz is Hillary’s likely Secretary of Defense, the two together mean World War 3.

When the Soviet Union collapsed, Wolfowitz, then a high Pentagon official, penned the Wolfowitz doctrine. The doctrine states that the principal goal of US foreign policy is to prevent the rise of other countries that could serve as constraints on US unilateralism. This means Russia and China, The combination of Hillary with Wolfowitz should scare everyone in the entire world. The prospect of nuclear weapons being in such crazed hands as those of Hillary and Wolfowitz is the most alarming though imaginable.

The question is whether Hillary can be elected in the face of her violations of national security rules, for which she received a pass from corrupt Obama, and her heavily documented self-dealings that have produced a Clinton private fortune of $120 million and $1,600 million in their foundation. It is completely clear that the Clintons use public office for their private aggrandizement. Is this what Americans want? Two people who become even more rich as the world is led into nuclear war?

But with electronic voting machines, the question will not be decided by what Amerians want, but by how the electronic machines are programmed to report the vote. The US has already had elections in which the exit polls, always a reliable indicator of the winner prior to the appearance of electronic voting machines, indicated a different winner than the electronic voting machines produced. The secrecy of how the voting machines are programmed is protected by “proprietary software.” The machines have no paper trails, precluding vote recounts.

As both political establishments are fiercely opposed to Trump, how do you think the machines will be programmed? Indeed, the media is so opposed to Trump, the question is whether there will be exit polls and if there are, will they be misreported?

Republican operatives, not Republican voters, are all in a huff over their allegations that Trump is costing the Republicans votes. How can this be when Republican voters chose Trump over other candidates? Aren’t the Republican operatives saying that they, instead of the voters, should choose the Republican candidate?

If so, they are just like the Democrats. Some years ago the Democrat establishment created “super delegates” who are not chosen by voters. Enough “super delegates” were created in order to give the Party establishment the ability to over-ride the voters choice of presidential candidate. That it was the Democrats—allegedly the party of the people—who first took the choice away from the people is astonishing. Much information indicates that Bernie Sanders actually won the Democratic presidential nomination but was denied it by vote fraud and “super delegates.”

This is politics in America—totally corrupt. Chris Hedges might be right: nothing can change without revolution.

The demonization of Trump by the presstitutes is proof that Trump, despite his wealth, is regarded by the Oligarchs who comprise the One Percent as a threat to their agendas. The Oligarchs, not Trump, own or control the media. So the presstitute demonization of Trump is complete proof that he is the candidate to elect. The oligarchs who oppress us hate Trump, so the oppressed American people should support Trump.

The presstitute demonization of Trump did not work in the Republican primaries. Is it working in the presidential election? We don’t know, because the polls are reported by the presstitutes, not by Trump.

If the demonization does not work, and the election has to be stolen from Trump by the electronic machines, the consequence will be to radicalize Americans, something long overdue. Perhaps the expectation of this development is the reason all federal agencies, even the post office and Social Security, have acquired arms and ammunition, and Cheney’s firm Halliburton was paid $385,000,000 to build detention centers in the US.

Those who control us are not going to give up their control without a world war. In the United States evil has seized power from the people, and evil will not give it back.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: election; evil; oligarchy; trump; wolfowitz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: Weeble

For people with courage, there’s plenty more.


41 posted on 09/01/2016 12:09:26 PM PDT by Bogie (Just a coincidence?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Weeble

http://www.unz.com/pbuchanan/syria-their-war-not-ours/


42 posted on 09/01/2016 12:19:46 PM PDT by Bogie (Just a coincidence?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Weeble

http://www.unz.com/article/the-answer-to-hillarys-charge-of-racism-is-the-charge-of-treason-against-america-and-its-founding-stock/


43 posted on 09/01/2016 12:27:18 PM PDT by Bogie (Just a coincidence?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Weeble

http://www.unz.com/pbuchanan/yes-the-system-is-rigged/


44 posted on 09/01/2016 12:32:43 PM PDT by Bogie (Just a coincidence?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Weeble

“US coup in Ukraine”

Did that really happen?

I remember that I enjoyed reading Roberts in the past, so I read this article. I don’t know if he changed, or I changed, but the article seems to merge too many topics, and is also over the top.

I have to admit that I too have succumbed to the temptation to put many of my favorite rants into one blog entry. After all, with enough effort and imagination, most anything can be related to most anything else. So Roberts goes from international policy to voter fraud, etc., all in one article.

A solid, sound, informative article on electronic voting machines (without foreign policy) would have been better IMO.

For those who prefer the kitchen sink approach, let’s not forget the prospect of Barack Hussein Obama, Supreme Court Justice.


45 posted on 09/01/2016 12:34:25 PM PDT by ChessExpert (It's not compassion when you use government to give other people's money away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Weeble

http://www.commondreams.org/views/2016/09/01/us-arms-makers-invest-new-cold-war


46 posted on 09/01/2016 12:48:00 PM PDT by Bogie (Just a coincidence?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truth_seeker

You make good points.

It was not until just recently that I began to understand the danger that President Eisenhower warned us of, in his farewell speech of 1961, when he told us to beware the “military-industrial complex”.


47 posted on 09/01/2016 1:07:32 PM PDT by Bigg Red (Go away, Satan! -- Fr.Jacques Hamel (R.I.P., martyr))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Bigg Red
He was trying to understand how things could have gotten so crazy as to do that destruction and loss of life. Of course, he saw it first hand.

I believe him to be our last truly great president.

48 posted on 09/01/2016 2:02:27 PM PDT by Bogie (Just a coincidence?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

All of those guys were just wonderful. I don’t think they’d like us much.


49 posted on 09/01/2016 2:37:39 PM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder
results cannot be allowed to be tabulated electronically. I mean, that ship has sailed.

I have said on FR since 98 that voting machines were the tools of tyrants, and outcomes cannot be challenged successfully.

I feel in my heart that a majority of the voters in this country can not possibly favor Hillary over Trump, but I can not in in my heart predict that Trump will win. This will be the first election since Ike that I am not confident of the outcome.

Either the polls are true or they are not. The trouble is if they are not they will make every effort to make them seem true, with vote fraud. Of course if they are true then the Republic is already dead and it will matter not what we do in this cycle.

50 posted on 09/01/2016 3:25:05 PM PDT by itsahoot (GOP says, Vote Trump. But if your principles won't let you, Hillary is OK.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Bogie

I don’t think Eisenhower was addressing the horrors of war. He was concerned about the enormity of the funding devoted to weapons and defense systems. Today’s staggering budgets are way beyond what he could have imagined, I suppose.


51 posted on 09/01/2016 4:36:01 PM PDT by Bigg Red (Go away, Satan! -- Fr.Jacques Hamel (R.I.P., martyr))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Bigg Red
You are correct about the costs, however, he saw first hand, what was left of Europe.

In either case, the bill will be paid.

52 posted on 09/01/2016 7:26:11 PM PDT by Bogie (Just a coincidence?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Bogie

Vet true.


53 posted on 09/01/2016 7:42:08 PM PDT by Bigg Red (Go away, Satan! -- Fr.Jacques Hamel (R.I.P., martyr))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Bigg Red

Vet = Very


54 posted on 09/01/2016 10:15:29 PM PDT by Bigg Red (Go away, Satan! -- Fr.Jacques Hamel (R.I.P., martyr))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson