Posted on 09/17/2016 9:44:28 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
Seizing on Donald Trump’s suggestion that Hillary Clinton’s bodyguards should disarm and “let’s see what happens to her,” CNN went into full Clinton-campaign mode this morning.
Leading the charge was Christi Paul, whom CNN curiously bills as an “anchor” rather than the Clinton surrogate she appears to be. Said Paul to Trump supporter Jeffrey Lord: “let’s say Joe Schmoe out in the audience said something like that. That would be seen, most likely, as a threat of some sort, and he would be hauled away. How is it that Donald Trump gets away with it?“
View the video here.
(Excerpt) Read more at legalinsurrection.com ...
CNN ‘anchor’ says “Joe Schmoe” would be “hauled away” if he made Trump’s remark about disarming Hillary’s bodyguards. She wants to know how Trump “gets away with it.”
Ping to Liberal Media Criticism list.
Would appreciate it if someone could ping this to the Bang list or let me know how to do it. Thanks!
Christi you ignorant slut.
How’s things down there in third place CNN? Third place of a rapidly diminishing ratings pool.
Why do you idiots even bother with this silly crap? Yeah, Trump was threatening Hillary, that’s right. The 2000 or so people still watching you are probably going to vote for Hillary anyway. Save your breath.
ANNNNNND trumps genius screwing of the media yesterday has been
pushed into oblivion by these comments. DAMNIT!!!
He was doing so well................
For the past couple of weeks he had been sticking to a winning strategy.
Liberals want to disarm the people while they are protected by armed guards. And the see no hypocrisy in it at all.
WHAT is the “Bang list”??
Hey Lady!
I’ve been saying it for as long as any ‘(&*(^’ Democrat has been talking about ‘gun control’.
I hope Trump says it loud, proud, and often!!
OTOH, I wish Hillary the luck of the Archduke Ferdinand!
snowflakes all
actually, just flakes
Well if people listen to his remarks and think about what he said they would agree with him. Why are certain people allowed to be protected but not all?
If she wants no guns then she should not be able to beneift from the protection they offer either.
She is against guns?
I say disarm her guards.
Nobody has come to haul me away yet...
They’re panicking.
Love how the Clinton News Network is in meltdown mode.
Seriously? Trump’s comment brilliantly points out the hypocrisy of a Dem gun-grabber who has extensive taxpayer-provided ARMED security. Well, gee, I don’t have that, I have to rely on my own firearms, or at least will do that again soon after I replace those that were lost in a Labor Day boating accident.
It is not a threat, it is an observation.
Many government official that are anti-gun, but only for the citizens. They are perfectly happy to be surrounded by armed guards, and many have their own conceal weapon permit.
Trump is simply pointing out the hypocrisy.
The average citizen sees the hypocrisy and know that when they bring it up in public they do get hauled away. Its the king has no clothes thing that the average citizen loves.
Hillary gets away with destroying government records. We’d be in prison. So why get your panties in a wad about yet another true observation by Trump illustrating how Hillary thinks she is better than we are. We are not amused at this phony outrage on the part of the Democrat press and lame Clinton surrogates.
2nd Amendment ping list
Hey Christi, you should be asking how does Hillary get away with things she’s done?
GFYC
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.