Nice bush.
Posted on 09/29/2016 3:34:51 PM PDT by Retired Submariner
So OK, is this something actually new?
No, it is instead something all us men have discovered once we decided to act the Man.
Nice bush.
Well .. I think a few battered women would disagree with you.
Being manly is more than how much you can beat up a woman.
Behind every sensitive and in touch with his feelings man is a woman that regularly has to go hit a biker bar or truck stop.
Look, it really is simple.......
Start out acting the Man, because they REALLY and SECRETLY like that...so, if you start out acting like a Man, they can only blame themself in the end....And then they will get a Cat...Or several Cats.
Do you here know why women like Cats? They like Cats because Cats act like the Men they truly want....Cats demand they be treated special, and Cats act indifferent to them and demand they be petted and spoiled and allowed to roam.
My Dad was cool....He knew chit, but only revealed it in scattered little comments....So it paid to listen.
One day he saw me bring home a really hot blonde Polack gal...Sandra.
When we had a moment together he said, “Son, if you want that little blonde to attempt to hurt you tonight in bed, then tell her your mom hates her.”
...And I did....And she did really try to hurt me....And it was good.
And I love and miss my dad so badly
The original producers of snowfakes
Equality of rights is not equality of responsibility. The great failure of feminism is that it refuses to believe and in fact denies this simple truth. The Suffragettes fought for and won equal rights. Feminists fight for not accepting responsibility, as women, and thus lose. It goes to abject denial of biological reality. Male and female are complementary. Equal in rights, but each with unique responsibilities. This because, biologically, the female invests far more in reproduction--she risks her life to bring a child into the world--than the male. Thus, the primary responsibility for raising offspring falls on the female. They are her greatest investment.
In most animal species, neither parent is involved in raising offspring--once hatched or born, the little ones are on their own. Among birds and mammals, however, the female is solely involved in raising offspring. Only in a handful of species does the male have any involvement whatsoever.
Basically, in nature, the male establishes a territory, or a position in a hierarchy, in order to attract a female. The female then moves in to build her nest so that she can raise her offspring under his protection. Truly monogamous species, in which female and male, share responsibilities in raising offspring are incredibly rare.
Mate selection is solely at the discretion of the female, throughout the animal kingdom. But the dynamic under discussion remains the same--the male establishes a territory and the female builds a nest. Hence, the definitions of masculinity and femininity become real. Of course, the female is attracted to the dominant male. He can best provide for and protect her, and possesses the best or most preferable genes for her offspring. Her foremost concern is producing viable offspring, otherwise the investment is not worth the risk. The Suffragettes understood and accepted this. They fought for equal rights, but they did not question their responsibility in choosing their husband and raising their children. They fully realized that they were free to work and pursue a career, but in a chosen marriage they took their roles as wife, partner, and mother, parent, seriously.
The Feminists, beginning with Simone de Beauvoir, live-in girlfriend of John Paul Sartre, a Marxist, argued that was oppression. Because Feminism, Marxism in a dress, sees the responsibility for raising children as belonging to the state. No longer was it the role of a woman to be a partner to a man and a parent to her child. The central premise of Marxism is that the nuclear family must be dissolved so that the state could control the people and rule over all things. Thus women as workers are reduced to baby factories, and the children are handed over to the state, so that the women can return to work. And men as workers are reduced to sperm donors, so that the men can return to work. It's all about subservience to the state. And the family becomes inconsequential as extinguished.
There is no romance is this bleak society. No courtship, no love exists between man and woman. Nor is there any love between parents and children. Everyone is just a cog in the dismal machine.
Question: why was Hera the most powerful of the Olympians? Because she was goddess of the bed. Women have understood this for thousands of years. Feminists forgot it in forty.
From the bed, all life is born. Everything--family, society, culture, civilization, humanity--ultimately descends from the bed of a woman, her chosen mate and her children. The great lie of Feminism is that it does not.
Note that in Genesis, Adam is made of earth but Eve is made of human. That makes the female a higher order of creation, which places the greater responsibility on her. Note also that when Eve seduces Adam, after the Fall when God confronts them both in Eden, God does not question Eve. He questions Adam. "What did you do?"
Interesting take IMO.
That is why single women who vote, vote in overwhelming numbers for big government. I have found the man that makes them feel secure yet.
As a semi-prominent so-called feminist - whose name I did not note at the time - wrote around 1992:
“The problem with sexism is that it’s sexy.”
Communists just cannot accept Nature: Their Luciferian hubris tells them that they can usurp the role and power of God the Creator by changing biological reality merely by legislating it.
Communists - including ideological feminists - demand equality of outcome: That is inherently artificial and therefore invariably requires governmental coercion to create.
C. S. Lewis wrote in That Hideous Strength of how Jane Studdock rebelled at sexual submission to her husband Mark “in the very teeth of instinct”: Her body and her spirit both wanted to submit to his possession, but her secular, academic indoctrination made her hate her natural responses to male domination.
I have long believed that one of the secret reasons that feminists refuse to denounce Islamic males, who routinely dominate and degrade women to an unsurpassed degree, is that they subconsciously find them more virile and attractive than the neutered males they have produced in our own culture.
No Sir, that is not just interesting.....It surmises in total ALL of yesterday, today and tomorrow.
People today still have INSTINCTS, and their instincts still motivate them just a little...And usually too late.
It is perhaps satisfying that years after a suddenly feminist wife destroys her marriage that she sees the truth in those words, but it is usually too late for the children she loosed into our society.
“I told you so” echoes empty in an empty land.
You have it right.
Nature ultimately conquers nurture, when that nurture is inherently artificial and unnatural.
Christianity, for one, seeks to elevate and humanize the marital union, but it does not do so by denying the inherent differences between men and women. When churches attempt to do that (as with either feminism or homoeroticism), they have left the path of spiritual wisdom and embraced carnal heresy.
Yes, women want a Big Daddy.
The communists (”progressives”) who promoted the 19th Amendment did not care nearly so much about real equality; they cared about perpetuating a leftist electorate.
Women far outnumber any minority voting bloc: The women’s vote, more than anything else, has guaranteed an inexorable march down the path toward totalitarianism.
I have known some brilliant conservative women - but they will always be outnumbered by leftist females.
It is males - especially white males - who predominately vote conservative. That is the reason for the intense animus toward same by the media, and why they ant them displaced by non-whites.
The income tax, the senate popular vote, and the women’s vote all were put in place to ultimately create communism in America, but the last has been the most deleterious.
“She picked that pose to hide her figure. Here she is standing up:”
Still not bad. Doesn’t make up for crazy, but if she was nice, no problem.
Exactly...!!!
If they can’t hold a man, they marry the government!
Black is sliming...but only so much.
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/09/29/hey-how-about-pantsuit-tee-hillary-selling-clothing-for-emasculated-man.html
Here's another favorite of mine: the AT&T uh, person.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.