Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anti-Trump CEO? Sue him into oblivion
wnd.com ^ | 11/29/2016 | Mychal Massie

Posted on 11/29/2016 5:12:11 AM PST by rktman

Matthew Blanchfield, CEO of 1st In SEO, a search-engine optimization company, has established a code of business that states his company openly practices discrimination and xenophobia.

Blanchfield’s position states: “If you are a Republican, voted for Donald Trump or support Donald Trump, in any manner, you are not welcome at 1st In SEO and we ask you to leave our firm. To our Democrat and Progressive clients, we want to recommit to you that we will continue to work diligently to improve your Internet marketing results in this quickly changing world.”

There is no gray area or ambiguity pursuant to Blanchfield’s public articulation of discrimination. His bigotry is condemnable, and his smug intolerance is emblematic of white and/or black supremacists who practice racism and xenophobic exclusion.

A few questions need to be answered here. How does Blanchfield propose to find out who people supported? Does he propose to have perspective clients and/or employees fill out paperwork stating if they are Republican or Democrat? Will he have a questionnaire that demands a person state how he or she voted? What about those who are presently employed or serviced by his company

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: antitrump; liars; matthewblanchfield; seo; tolerance
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
Saw this ignorant POS on the Tucker Carlson (I think) show last week. Wow! Talk about deluded. He had that air of "I'm SOOOOO much smarter and better than you." about him. So, if someone refuses to bake a cake now it'll be okay? No? Funny how that works. I suppose if one had their own business they could exclude any hildabeast supporters without anyone having recourse?
1 posted on 11/29/2016 5:12:11 AM PST by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rktman

Politics and business and profit should always remain completely separate if the target market is truly just consumer oriented. To do otherwise is business suicide, IMO.


2 posted on 11/29/2016 5:16:51 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Just a liberal doing what liberals have always done.


3 posted on 11/29/2016 5:18:43 AM PST by Arm_Bears (Rope. Tree. Politician/Journalist. Some assembly required.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

By progressive standards he is guilty of discrimination and needs to be sued into a dumpster.
By my free market capitalist standards he has a perfect right to refuse to associate with anyone for any reason.
And suffer the consequences.


4 posted on 11/29/2016 5:19:34 AM PST by Buttons12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

These are mostly people who came out of some university program in the 1990s...which makes you wonder what exactly they learned during that period. There’s some missing sense of value or understanding over what the companies purpose is.

I don’t see how the board can continue on with this guy leading the company. He needs to go, and probably just buy a car-wash or landscaping service. He’s just not CEO material in my humble opinion.


5 posted on 11/29/2016 5:19:53 AM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rktman
How does Blanchfield propose to find out who people supported? Does he propose to have perspective clients and/or employees fill out paperwork stating if they are Republican or Democrat? Will he have a questionnaire that demands a person state how he or she voted? What about those who are presently employed or serviced by his company

1) Party registration is a public record.

2) Campaign contributions are also public records.

3) People are also chatty on social media.

A company whose CEO really wanted to find out the political leanings of specific employees could do so. Keep in mind, though, that this works both ways.

6 posted on 11/29/2016 5:22:29 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (Big government is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Is it a public company? Everyone buy a share an launch a class action suit the next time this idiot doubles down and opens his mouth.


7 posted on 11/29/2016 5:22:55 AM PST by Mjreagan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

a True CEO would do what is smart for their company. Not react to their own personal butt-hurt feelings!


8 posted on 11/29/2016 5:23:07 AM PST by rwoodward ("god, guns and more ammo")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buttons12

So, are you saying that those “WE RESERVE THE RIGHT TO REFUSE SERVICE” signs should be once again posted? Seems like they don’t carry much clout currently. ;-)


9 posted on 11/29/2016 5:24:34 AM PST by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

One would have to be a complete idiot to put personal politics above company profit and responsibility to stakeholders if the business is supposed to be or should be apolitical.


10 posted on 11/29/2016 5:27:46 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Is this even a big company? Are there even shareholders?


11 posted on 11/29/2016 5:32:21 AM PST by BookmanTheJanitor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Its going to be funny what happens if the Dems and Progs actually succeed at collapsing Western civilization and rule of law.

Some people have long memories and will want revenge for the country getting ruined.

Its not too difficult to imagine a RWOL SHTF “Walking Dead”-like Negan situation where a bunch of simp Progs are on their knees and get taken out by a baseball bat one at a time.

In such a situation, someone like me won’t be interested in excuses like “We didn’t know any better” or “We were misled”. Someone like me would avenge the people their policies killed.


12 posted on 11/29/2016 5:32:46 AM PST by baltimorepoet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

As he is not discriminating against any protected group no harm will come. We need to stop this “protected group” nonsense.


13 posted on 11/29/2016 5:38:22 AM PST by bk1000 (A clear conscience is a sure sign of a poor memory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Blanchfield is a fool.

“I am successful, so all must be like me to be successful.”

Foolishness.


14 posted on 11/29/2016 5:39:43 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

EEOC Guidelines for Discrimination

https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/types/index.cfm

No mention of “Creed”

Definition of creed
1
: a brief authoritative formula of religious belief
2
: a set of fundamental beliefs; also : a guiding principle

Have the Libs expunged “creed” from Race, Color or Creed as a basis for Discrimination......because is obstructs their agenda?


15 posted on 11/29/2016 5:40:03 AM PST by Be Careful
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Yes.


16 posted on 11/29/2016 5:50:10 AM PST by Buttons12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625
Keep in mind, though, that this works both ways.

Well, no....THAT woulds be wrong. /s

17 posted on 11/29/2016 5:53:14 AM PST by Mr.Unique (The government, by its very nature, cannot give except what it first takes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rktman

If you have a business and refuse to serve a Trump supporter you will be a hero to the media and get national free advertising.

Unfortunatley you would also lose half (if not more) of your customers.

This CEO should be fired for these comments- as they are NOT in the best interests of the company


18 posted on 11/29/2016 5:53:55 AM PST by Mr. K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buttons12

The free market case for not suing this guy is greater when the business is small and the employment market is truly free. But what do we do when leftists, pre-selected by our leftist credentialing system, worm their way into control of most major businesses and begin to discriminate against us? We cannot form our own General Motors, U-Tube, etc., to hire us. Will conservatives end up restricted to farming, fixing things, etc.? Bottom line: some government intervention if going to be needed.


19 posted on 11/29/2016 5:56:31 AM PST by Socon-Econ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rktman

All employees mentioned should head directly to the local EEOC office and demand a ruling of discrimination and then contact the local activist legal agencies to sue on their behalf. The more suits the better, bankrupt the company in the courts the way the libs do conservatives.


20 posted on 11/29/2016 5:58:52 AM PST by Billyv (Freedom isn't Free! Get off the sidelines!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson