Posted on 12/06/2016 9:58:37 AM PST by Ray76
Dems are never forced to say who they’d nominate, so this is not an argument.
More and more this becomes an HRC effort to defeat the electoral college effort.
So where was all the integrity of earlier campaign comments about accepting the results?
Super crooked.
They know they are going to jail if they can not disrupt Trump.
“...I think Trump understands this. They will never go away...”
This is why Trump’s DOJ (not Trump himself personally) must see that Hillary is formally prosecuted for her crimes or she will come back again and again ... even if it is through Chelsea...
Yup. No doubt about it.
By the way, I had to do a double-take on the photo. When I first glanced at it I thought the judge’s bowtie had a confederate battle-flag motif.
Could she possibly be pissing off even the court jesters routing for HRC, even? Sounds like she wants to take a loss so as to blame the courts AND keep da money.
Wiki states that he is a Psychiatrist! Maybe he could diagnose her as certifiably crazy and have her committed!
I thought Hillar..err..Stein pushing for a recount was to “ensure the integrity of the electoral process”.
Sooo, WTF does it matter if a MI SC Justice is on Trump’s list if they’re not trying to flip the election to she-who-must-not-be-named?
Plain as day. All of this is nothing BUT an attempt to flip the results, or it wouldn’t matter ONE IOTA if a MI Justice is on Trump’s SCOTUS list.
She sorta kinda reminds me of Al Gore...
Well that happened here to our former corrupt Demo-rat Attorney General, Kathleen Kane.
She had gone after various judges on the State Supreme Court for sending around dirty emails. Then after she was convicted of leaking secret Grand Jury testimony in a separate case, those justices refused to hear her appeal.
What goes around comes around.
*Correction* His WIFE is a psychiatrist that is...
She is making it very easy for DT DOJ and AG to go after her. DTs favorables would go up. Jill Stain? In John Edwards territory at about 3% approval
[[and therefore have a conflict of interest in having Trump elected POTUS.]]
yeah like the left doesn’t have a conflict of interest in that they do not want donald elected
Wouldn’t it be nice if we got to commit crimes, then pick our own jury by asking “Ok- listen up... Who among you thinks I’m innocent and should go free?”- and only choose those who pledge to support us 100%- a 100% biased jury-
Yep Hillary and IF she were to flip it all, I think her time as potus would be a living hell.
New headlines should read “Jill Stein does not want African American judges to hear her case”
If Stein keeps pushing this she runs the risk of the wrong type of person fixating on her.
Nope, winning Michigan doesn’t make Trump “lose” the Presidency so they have absolutely nothing to gain. He already won with or without Michigan and thus they stand to gain nothing that they haven’t already gained. Try again
Only they’ve already “gained” because Trump has already won with or without Michigan. Trump winning has nothing to do with Michigan be recounted. Try again Liberals. Don’t give in to their stupid premises.
:O
Good point!
She’s illustrating a statement by Einstein, that there are limits to genius; but that stupidity knows no boundaries.
She’s got another problem.....money!
Over the last 26 hours, she has raised close to $30,000...she is running at about $1,200 per hour. So far she has only raised $7.2 million of the $9.5-$10 million she will need.
right now she is running on empty.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.