Skip to comments.
Democrats elect civil rights lawyer as nominee for US House
Associated Press ^
| Feb 11, 2017 7:28 PM EST
| Roxana Hegeman
Posted on 02/11/2017 7:25:56 PM PST by Olog-hai
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
1
posted on
02/11/2017 7:25:56 PM PST
by
Olog-hai
To: Olog-hai
They’re running on hate and want to flip Kansas?
State went big for Trump in November. Talk about nurturing delusion.
2
posted on
02/11/2017 7:28:04 PM PST
by
goldstategop
((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever))
To: Olog-hai
Question one, what is your position on the ninth circuit ruling on temporarily halting immigration from seven countries?
To: Olog-hai
LOL.
Trump has been President less than a month and liberals now want a referendum.
In the meantime, all the Democrats have said is “NO.” Go figure.
4
posted on
02/11/2017 7:34:48 PM PST
by
goldstategop
((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever))
To: Olog-hai
I don’t think a civil rights lawyer will fly in KANSAS.
5
posted on
02/11/2017 7:35:30 PM PST
by
stars & stripes forever
(Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord. Psalm 33:12)
To: Olog-hai
Congrats to the proprietor of this web site for finally being given a shot at Congress! Go Jim Thomspon!!!
6
posted on
02/11/2017 7:37:03 PM PST
by
Defiant
(The media is the colostomy bag where truth goes after democrats digest it.)
To: stars & stripes forever
Kansas is flyover country. Democrats soliciting votes from white voters whom they heavily detest.
I mean they’re racist, fascist, sexist, homophobe and Islamophobe.
Why on earth would a Democrat want to represent white people?
It doesn’t compute.
7
posted on
02/11/2017 7:38:38 PM PST
by
goldstategop
((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever))
To: Olog-hai
Kansas 2016 Presidential election: 57.2% Trump vs 36.2% Clinton. These Democrats are sniffing glue.
8
posted on
02/11/2017 7:40:21 PM PST
by
farming pharmer
(www.sterlingheightsreport.com)
To: akalinin; Impy; AuH2ORepublican; Clintonfatigued; BillyBoy
KS-4 is 60.2% Trump, 33% Hillary. Hasn’t elected a Democrat member since Dan Glickman in 1992.
To: fieldmarshaldj
Democrats don’t understand why they lost and they will lash out some more after they lose again on April 11.
They’ll blame Kansans for being snookered by Trump.
10
posted on
02/11/2017 7:49:24 PM PST
by
goldstategop
((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever))
To: Olog-hai
> voter discontent
These guys are really delusional. They believe their own astroturf operations.
11
posted on
02/11/2017 7:52:15 PM PST
by
Ray76
(DRAIN THE SWAMP)
To: Olog-hai
> This is going to be a referendum on Trumps policies
All three weeks of them.
12
posted on
02/11/2017 7:53:59 PM PST
by
Ray76
(DRAIN THE SWAMP)
To: Olog-hai
I just love the smell burnt donkey in the morning!
13
posted on
02/11/2017 7:58:01 PM PST
by
jmaroneps37
(Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
To: Olog-hai
"Democrats view it as their best chance to flip the seat representing the heavily Republican 4th District in southern Kansas." If that's the best shot they've got, they're screwed!
14
posted on
02/11/2017 7:59:55 PM PST
by
Windflier
(Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
To: Olog-hai
Why would they pick the founder of Free Republic to run as a Democrat?
15
posted on
02/11/2017 8:01:58 PM PST
by
Bronzewound
(2016 GOP. A Timid Little Division Of The Democrat Party.)
To: Bronzewound
Has to be on Olbermann’s advise.
16
posted on
02/11/2017 8:05:52 PM PST
by
Olog-hai
To: Bronzewound
That is, advice.
17
posted on
02/11/2017 8:06:36 PM PST
by
Olog-hai
To: Olog-hai
Army Veteran? Really don’t want to question his service, but I just wonder from whom he got his Democrat “values”.
18
posted on
02/11/2017 9:20:13 PM PST
by
Maudeen
(No one on this earth is too far gone for Jesus.)
To: Maudeen
"Army Veteran? Really dont want to question his service, but I just wonder from whom he got his Democrat values."
Heck, "Army veteran" just means that he finished one enlistment. For that matter, since they don't seem to be making much more of that fact, it's possible that he didn't even finish a full enlistment but still got out with good paper.
Being an Army retiree myself, I'll be the first to say that being called an "Army veteran" .. but not a "combat veteran" or "retiree" .. isn't too high of a bar.
19
posted on
02/11/2017 9:25:38 PM PST
by
BlueLancer
(Ex Scientia Tridens)
To: BlueLancer
Well, my Mom and Dad were WWII Veterans and raised us to love God and Country. . .but I guess that didn’t happen in all Vets’ households back then either.
20
posted on
02/11/2017 9:37:31 PM PST
by
Maudeen
(No one on this earth is too far gone for Jesus.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson