Posted on 06/08/2017 8:36:53 AM PDT by Morgana
What this means is that IF you do what a judge may think is WRONG, you open yourself to the nightmare of a lawsuit.
What this means is that IF you do NOT do what what a judge may think is RIGHt, you open yourself to the nightmare of a lawsuit.
Heaven help the patient whose doctor must make a decision on what a court will think years later.
“Kill ‘em while their young... really, really young.”
Um, check the title, doesn’t match the story (typo maybe).
So what in blue blazes is getting into the corn that they eat? Something wicked to the Midwest comes?
This is like “Who wished this baby punishment on you, dearie.”
Ah, we knew that “may kill on option” would morph into “must kill.”
God’s heart aches and surely wishes that people’s hearts would. Asking rhetorically: Hey liberals, this ought to surely be your forte if anything was? Or are you simply illiberals in liberals’ clothing? Well sure and fine, dear liberals, find some way to unite America (doesn’t have to be a government program, in fact government programs are a good way to vitiate such things) to help care for the mothers of troubled babies. Which doesn’t require killing the troubled babies, or, God forbid, implying a duty to do that? Surely anything less would be illiberal?
Just damn. I sometimes wish that liberals actually WOULD be liberal. We’d take care of a lot of problems that way.
Imagine what this boy will experience when he realizes that the failure to kill him was the subject of a state supreme court ruling.
Since the poor child cannot walk or talk, hopefully he will never realize that his parents wanted him dead.
Poor child whose parents feel that way!
Hoping that, first off, somebody else will be willing to adopt him, ending the drama queening.
At least this is what the doctors are saying. Sometimes they are right; sometimes they are mistaken. If someone with the means and willingness wants to try for a different fate, let it transpire.
I don't think you give people with this disability enough credit. He most likely will gain understanding, as he matures mentally, that he was used as a pawn to affirm some "right" to kill other children just like him.
That can be hell on earth.
I’ve asked God why some folks have to treat their children as private-pride showpieces.
God’s ideas for a child might be different from their own. And the result is going to be one colossal, tragic, and largely needless struggle.
God often has a way of bringing goodness out of the midst of evil. As long as there is good and evil and choice in this world, there will be real life morality stories.
That boy’s biological mother may frown her way down to hell. To the boy it may be a different story; his foster parents may carry the true love of God. He may become so grateful to the foster parents and, yes, ultimately to God, that the hateful forces in his past will become vanquished villains.
What if planned parenthood sells this defective baby’s parts without informing “the buyer” that they are Abby Normal?
Let’s hope and pray so. But I cannot imagine being in that boy’s position, realizing that they would have wanted him dead for “being who he is.”
Quality of life for the child? Or quality of life for her?
Um, read the article. That is the original title.
I know quite a bit about these kinds of problems.
You refer to people with “this” disability. The story doesn’t give enough information to conclude exactly what this disability consists of. Apparently the child has multiple disabilities. You don’t know.
This is the title from the story, just posted as is.
Very sad situation...is aborting an abnormal unborn childs development a valid solution to lifes problems? Are there other paths or solutions?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.