Posted on 08/09/2017 10:20:55 AM PDT by Kaslin
Yeah, yeah, a lot of them would have degrees in soc, poly sci, black studies, women studies, gender studies, etc.
About the hardest thing in those programs is setting aside one's common sense, and being able to regurgitate the bs without going nuts.
Make that percentages since they dumped the SATs as a requirement.
The latest I saw was that a Prof was letting his students choose their own grades so they didn’t get triggered or anxious. Formula for success- NOT!
They would get a student body that could succeed at Harvard without dumbing down the classes. No one should be looking at color before, during or after the acceptance process. If they want diversity they can select for diverse life experience, that is not a color or racial divider.
Blah blah blah...
I agree with the Supreme Court and Harvard about the importance of diversity.
Of course you do.
heh, that’s an impolitic thing to wonder about....
bfl
Affirmative Action is just a code word for racism.
No. There aren't.
The doors of opportunity have been open wide. "Affirmative action" has been getting minorities admitted into college in excessive numbers.
If they are not succeeding, then "racial injustice" is not the issue. The issue is something else, and it will never be solved as long as "racial injustice" is promoted as an excuse. If you don't name the problem correctly, you can't solve it.
Fine, if you want to squeeze God out.
You are playing the pride game, that oh you have such a superior philosophy. I don’t do that. I just make a point of knowing a superior God, and it’s your own fault if you won’t do that yourself.
But anyhow as I might have also pointed out.
When Jesus said you shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free, that wasn’t about Pi even though as a good carpenter He would have to know about Pi.
Therefore this was a certain kind of truth. A salvational one.
So sue me if it is not clear to you. It’s clear to me.
Agree.
Not only is it BS, but studies (by liberals!) show that greater diversity creates greater social problems and less financial prosperity. So there is no big diversity bonus, only a diversity penalty.
I’m not against diversity, but I am 100% against discriminating in order to create forced diversity.
“Diversity” for “diversity’s” sake has much to do with the problems in the USA. It manifests itself in education, employment, crime, tokenism, drugs, bureaucracy, taxes/cost of living/insurance, neighborhoods, and attitudes that someone is somehow “owed” for alleged “past discrimination”
Oh wait, the “past discrimination” is old hat now. It’s that “Diversity” is a beautiful thing, remember ‘our strength DEPENDS on our ‘diversity’”
Such BS to rationalize for incompetence and laziness.
We’ve now matured to part II of the problem, where handing out unearned degrees leaves “graduates” unable to pass professional licensing exams anyway. Friends describe tokens unable to pass a bar exam in one case and an engineering exam in another. How many “preferred minority” lawyers and engineers can companies be forced to hire as basically admin assistants?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.