[Mad Dawgg]

10 Years? I say 10 months.

[wally_bert]

The State newspaper can’t shutter their doors soon enough to suit me.

[\/\/ayne]

It would have a lot longer if they apologized for previous liberal bias and began engaging in real journalism. Circulation would skyrocket! Young people would learn about the new (old) way of reading newspapers.

Well, that's not going to happen but too bad. It would be great to see.

[cgbg]

If they really cared about the environment they would stop printing now!

Hypocrites.

[miniTAX]

“Meanwhile, the company added 157,000 new digital subscriptions in the last quarter of 2017.”

And of course, no word about how many paper subscriptions the company has lost. The lying media couldn’t report any simple fact without lying.

[Brooklyn Attitude]

That’s 10 years too long.

[relictele]

Journalism is already all but dead thanks to the Times and others.

Printing of newspapers is a separate matter.

[rawcatslyentist]

Should have been printed 10 years ago!

Oh what will the fish vendors and bird owners do now?

[txrefugee]

That’s WAAAAY too long. The Democrat media is busy committing suicide and will not last through President Trump’s two terms.

[a fool in paradise]

And then they can wipe the historical records when Democrats say hypocritical things or a fake news forger is exposed.

[I want the USA back]

The local rag costs $2.00 daily, and $4 on Sunday. Not going to pay that to read leftist crap.

[puppypusher]

To think that I used to buy that paper every Sunday up until Bill Clinton became President.Saved a lot of money since then.

[americas.best.days...]

Reminds me of dinosaur media death watch...

[gunnyg]

Town Criers Gone!
Bloggers about all left NOW!
THEY’re working on that right now!
***********************************
@THE WORLD!/Planet WTF!
Semper Trump.45!IF We Can keep Him?
****************************************

[GrandJediMasterYoda]

Do people still to this day buy the NY Times with their over sized papers that look like bed sheets when you unfold them? Seems like a lot of work just to read fake news.

[Grampa Dave]

They will last until President Trump wins his second term.

Then, the Deep State Elites will stop funding any fish wraps.

Expect conservative owners of stock in companies that advertise in left wing fish wraps to start suing those companies for wasting hard earned corporate $’s supporting Democrat losers in their fish wraps.

[Ancesthntr]

“New York Times print products may last another 10 years, says the company’s CEO, Mark Thompson.”

---

Note to Mr. Thompson: your digital products will have a similar or shorter lifespan if the quality of the reporting is similar to the crap that your paper has been spewing out for the last couple of decades (or longer). When “reporting” consistently becomes advocacy for one particular political P.O.V., and it is obvious that the truth is NOT being reported (or very little of it is), then people stop subscribing. This applies to the print product...AND to the digital one, too.

Here’s my advice: Thompson, you’d better make your company into a reporter and honest analyzer of the news, or it is doomed.

[Libloather]

...it might face an expiration date.

It's WAY past that, and the stank is nauseating.

[GOPJ]

I hate the non-stop liberal crap in the print version of the New York Times...

AND

I hate the non-stop liberal crap in the 'digital version.

The biggest advantage for New York Times going 'digital only' would be if they could 'do a NewsWeek' and manipulate the numbers. I'm sure George Soros would be willing to buy a few thousand new digital subscribers... for ads that human eyes will never see.

[GOPJ]

I hate the non-stop liberal crap in the print version of the New York Times...

AND

I hate the non-stop liberal crap in the 'digital version.

The biggest advantage for New York Times going 'digital only' would be if they could 'do a NewsWeek' and manipulate the numbers. I'm sure George Soros would be willing to buy a few thousand new digital subscribers... for ads that human eyes will never see. Mark Thompson doesn't 'get it'. Drudge was successful BECAUSE he offered both sides... NOT because he was 'on a computer'.

[Grampa Dave]