Posted on 07/06/2018 8:04:34 PM PDT by bitt
A single letter has begun appearing on billboards near highways across the United States and on t-shirts at Trump rallies, and it has become an internet sensation among many conservatives.
“Q” represents a mysterious individual, or group of individuals, who began in October 2017 posting online updates on secret actions allegedly taken by the Trump administration to purge corruption from the United States and the world.
Most of the mainstream news outlets have written Q off as a conspiracy theory, but the constant barrage of anti-Trump articles and newscasts h
(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...
*
I have wondered if Q is engaging in “opposition research” by seeding the masses with information - some speculative, and some known.
I do not believe or disbelieve in Q. I simply want governmental criminals like the Clintons to get their just desserts.
Yes, because I think Q is a Deep State psyop to misdirect and occupy the minds of our best and brightest.
> cult
with Quite a few freepers as members
I call them Freeqers.
No it's not.
Adjective
qool (comparative qooler, superlative qoolest)
(slang, rare, nonstandard) Informal form of cool.
Freeqing cultists can't abide by the slightest deviation from their orthodox pseudo religion.
It's why they've gained a reputation as kooks. Blaspheme against their holy oracle, and you shall be damned to the everlasting fires of snark and rage.
You said it -- I didn't.
I love the premise. The admin under constant siege finds a way that no Gullibles or Elites would believe, to communicate with the real American people, the ones who believe in that old piece of goat skin under glass.
It just doesn’t seem to be anything and I lost interest.
We’ve got a running thread for civil Q discussion.
That’s very fair.
I enjoyed Quidam a lot more.
you called it cult speak and I gave you the definition of the word. Oh, and I love using rare nonstandard words with a side order of slang!
He’s hunt jackals with a bug killing salt gun, a lot of bangs but no penetration.
You gave me a definition that is just as offbeat and outside the mainstream as the Q cult fad.
Kinda figures, when you think about it.
It’s a carrot on a stick psyops operation.
I haven’t paid too much attention to Q. His main theses seem to be that Mueller is secretly on Trumps side, that the Trump/Sessions feud is fictitious play-acting, and that the deep state will face 40k+ arrests “sometime this month”.
I will need proof of the above theses for me to believe them. And no, a picture of a inpod with a reflected lamp in it is not proof of any of the above theses.
More to the point, the manner of Q’s speak is that of con-men and false profits. A lot of very ambiguous predictions that could mean anything, then a week later in hindsight you match them to something and boldly proclaim that as proof that the profit was correct. Or if not, there’s always “plans have changed” “I never said it would happen overnight” or even “Sorry that was disinformation”.
The only thing Q has convinced me of is that he or she has access to the White House.
The carrot is vapor. The stick is real.
LOL!
Jealous? LOL
Have a great evening :)
>while helluva lot of “BOOMS” and absolutely ZERO damage to any swamp creature
So … the vast array of GOPe (and Dim) resignations, corporate swampie resignations, child trafficking rings broken up, complete turnaround in the House of Saud (or in Qspeak, +++), disarray, panic, and desperate moves on the part of the swamp don’t count?
I think you mean “the big names like H and Soros haven’t been publicly frogmarched in handcuffs” and that’s true. I’m seeing lots of damage to the swamp, though, just not instant victory. Nor do I see a group that’s some sort of superheroes that never falter; the bad guys are not just hanging out like star wars stormtroopers waiting to be shot dramatically.
In the meantime, consider how many people are learning that there really *is* a swamp due to all this Q stuff. Given that the first weapon used against us is that we’re crazy ignorant idiots, every person who realizes Dems aren’t really “for” them is a win.
The rest, about trusting this or that … hmm. Let’s say I don’t … what would I do differently than I’m doing now?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.