Posted on 11/16/2018 1:15:01 PM PST by EyesOfTX
“And the judge is considering Acosta’s rudeness and arrogance a “capital, or otherwise infamous crime”?”
Because, you know, a white house press briefing is really a criminal trial and all that...
Might as well just turn out the lights.
“Make sense?”
No.
Does the author think this makes sense: “All the plaintiffs in the case against the White House this morning was an injunction in which...”
He can’t write a coherent sentence nor understand the case is about Acosta accosting a woman doing her job, not press freedom.
So he does not make sense on two levels. Literally he make sense and his logic makes no sense.
Isn’t it obvious that some judge might just as easily order the briefings restored on first amendment grounds? I know it’s crazy but I could see an argument that denying the press the opportunity to observe the body language of the president and his representatives, and the chance to “cross exam” them interferes with “the public’s right to know.”
Memories of being in grammar school when the teacher would just wait until the troublemaker would stop their antics. Then she would keep the whole class in for that amount of time during recess.
“...however a young pack of jackals are innocent animals.”
Tell that to a wildebeest being ripped to shreds by jackals or hyenas. Just sayin’.
Anyway, hope PDJT stands firm & imposes some really punitive rules on the WH press pack. Heck, they all hate him but aren’t as brazen about it as the Accoster. If his leadership strength is to relish a fight, this will turn out to his advantage.
“If they hate Trump, they hate his voters even worse.”
OK
Next time you are in this stupid judge’s court, just stand up and start shouting.
When the bailiff comes up to stop you, just push him away.
This moron would have you jailed for contempt in 30 seconds.
And he won’t worry about your due process and 1st and 5th amendment rights.
But it’s OK for this excuse for a judge to say someone can behave in that way with the President of the United States.
We are entering a Dark Age.
I can only guess, because I've had the television off since Fox New's election night stunt and plan to keep it that way for quite a while. Should have done it years ago.
This judge has NO JURISDICTION over the Executive Branch of the United States. NONE.
I am thinking of the young pack of jackals who have not left their den yet.
I’ve looked and looked in my copy of the Constitution and I can’t find Acosta’s name in there anywhere, much less a Constitutional right for him to be in the White House press room.
Um...not quite. The Judge could have denied the Prelim Injunction based on the case is frivolous. The judge could also have dismissed the case as it is frivolous.
Instead, the Judge made the asinine comment that the press briefings are open to a group and denying Acosta to be a member of the group is violating his 1st Amendment rights.
Here’s the case:
https://www.scribd.com/document/393112604/CNN-and-Acosta-v-Trump-Complaint
I read it. It is an embarrassment to reasonable minds everywhere. It is so frivolous.
In a nutshell, the case is this:
“We are high and mighty and this bad President hurt our feelings and did bad things to us. Please spank him”
Perhaps you missed this part from the article: "Judge Kelly also made it clear that he does not believe CNN or Acosta have an unfettered First Amendment-based right to a White House press badge."
The judge ruled that his Fifth Amendment right to due process may have been infringed. I do not believe there is any right to due process in this context. The members of the press are there at the pleasure of the president.
....nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property...
Was Acosta deprived of life? No.
Was Acosta deprived of liberty? Not exactly
Was Acosta deprived of property? The hard pass really wasn’t his property - so, No.
Case dismissed.
Someone needs to gift Acosta with the book:
“All I Ever Needed To Know, I learned In Kindergarten”.
“This judge has NO JURISDICTION over the Executive Branch of the United States. NONE”
Yup. Just like the last 100 injunctions from judicial activist ‘judges’.[immigration, etc] Who should have been ignored from the onset.
T^he ruling is wrong on its face.
For there to be a due process claim there must be a LEGAL process to violate. This is an administrative rule, not a legal right.
This judge quite simply does not know the law.
There is also a problem here about the judiciary ruling on things that not in its purview. AGAIN.
Trump needs to have his people RUSH this to SCOTUS and get a ruling in general about the judiciary meddling in Executive Branch powers as stated in the Constitution.
Damn sissy GOPers never challenged ALL the illegal powers obozo arrogated to himself. Now Trump is afraid to tell the courts who are ruling against him simply because they don’t like him “now enforce it.”
They are wrong because the press/hard pass just serves as barometer of signifying who is a professional journalists” after receiving one through the Standing Committee of Correspondents and a security clearance if you are privilege enough. The actual invitation into the White House is a privilege not a right because the White House has Constitutional discretion/protocols they give at their leisure.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.