Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The end of the Masterpiece Cakeshop case comes with a whimper
Religious News Service ^ | March 13, 2019 | Mark Silk

Posted on 03/15/2019 11:42:01 AM PDT by fwdude

(RNS) — Last week, to little notice, the Masterpiece Cakeshop case ended with a whimper. Nine months after the Supreme Court found that the Colorado Civil Rights Commission had acted prejudicially in upholding the complaint of a gay couple who were refused a wedding cake by baker Jack Phillips, the two sides agreed to stop fighting.

Specifically, the commission withdrew its proceedings against Phillips for discrimination and Phillips withdrew his case against the commission for harassment. Which is to say that Phillips can keep refusing to customize cakes that, as he put it, “celebrate events or express messages that conflict with my religious beliefs.”

As you’ll recall, the justices didn’t decide that Phillips has the right to say no. Writing for a 7-2 majority, Justice Anthony Kennedy declared that while “the religious and philosophical objections to gay marriage are protected views and in some instances protected forms of expression,” nevertheless “such objections do not allow business owners and other actors in the economy and in society to deny protected persons equal access to goods and services under a neutral and generally applicable public accommodations law.”

(Excerpt) Read more at religionnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Philosophy; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: antichristianbigotry; bakery; colorado; dnctalkingpoint; dnctalkingpoints; genderdysphoria; homosexualagenda; jackphillips; lawsuit; masterpiececakeshop; mediawingofthednc; partisanmediashills; presstitutes; religiousliberty; smearmachine; theend
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: Gay State Conservative

Let’s not forget (it has easily been forgotten in the past) that this was about decorating a cake so as to dedicate it to a specific event. Masterpiece would have sold a blank cake, or sold a generic wedding cake with no names. It said no when it came to decorating the cake so as to dedicate it to the “gay marriage.”


21 posted on 03/15/2019 1:47:21 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (May Jesus Christ be praised.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: max americana

The best way to combat this is by recovering social standards of purity, and the best way to do that is by coming back to God. Meeting God in a church is a good first step, but will you invite God to come back home with you?


22 posted on 03/15/2019 1:50:25 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (May Jesus Christ be praised.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: fwdude
I will disagree.

They actually do want to be worshiped.

"Meh," is what they have now.

23 posted on 03/15/2019 1:55:08 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (If you are going to be baked by a witch you might as well go out with a mouth full of gingerbread!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

They want to force you to worship them, in fact.

It’s part of the meanness dynamic of the devil.


24 posted on 03/15/2019 1:58:33 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (May Jesus Christ be praised.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

I just visited Masterpiece Cakeshop’s website and was dismayed to see this notice on the wedding cake page:

“Masterpiece Cakeshop is not currently accepting requests to create custom wedding cakes. Please check back in the future.”

I seems that he is still being pressured by the state “snivel rights” commission to some degree.


25 posted on 03/15/2019 2:05:16 PM PDT by fwdude (Think about it: Blacks were made slaves in Africa, but were made free men in America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: max americana
If I were the baker, i would sue those 2 faggots THEN the CO state for discrimination.

Wrong case.

26 posted on 03/15/2019 2:16:35 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Come to think of it I’ve never seen a Mohomed’s BBQ before.


27 posted on 03/15/2019 2:28:41 PM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

The bakery will need to be careful with this. If someone comes in pleading to have their cake decorated for Christian reasons, then find out later they were a plant, it could get real ugly. They’ll need to hold fast to not decorating anyone’s cake, if that’s the policy.


28 posted on 03/15/2019 2:28:51 PM PDT by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner
They’ll need to hold fast to not decorating anyone’s cake, if that’s the policy.

Then the sodomites win. Phillips lost 40% of his business by not making wedding cakes. He had to lay off people. I'll be that makes the sodomites happy.

His attorneys were fools for accepting the CO commission's agreement not to prosecute. He should have still pushed this to the Supreme Court.

29 posted on 03/15/2019 2:40:55 PM PDT by fwdude (Think about it: Blacks were made slaves in Africa, but were made free men in America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Win?

How much money did he spend on lawyers?

If the victory cost him his business and assets, they beat him


30 posted on 03/15/2019 2:44:56 PM PDT by bert ( (KE. N.P. N.C. +12) Honduras must be invaded to protect America from invasion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Correction:

They should not be forced to bake cakes with a pro-homoerotic message.

If businesses are allowed to discriminate solely based on identity, then that will solely be used against Christians, and conservatives, and Caucasians.

Look at the Big Tech unilateral targeting of same.


31 posted on 03/15/2019 4:41:44 PM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bert
"If the victory cost him his business and assets, they beat him"

Yep.

WE normies lost.

If "The Commission" wasn't disbanded, then all they will do is continue to harass Christian businesses.

That is ALL the court case said.

"The Commission" was just following orders.

So they can go on their merry way, waiting for another political viewpoint that they don't like.

Too bad, so sad for anyone who doesn't agree with "The Commission".

Oh, you *might* win this round, but you'll be bankrupt and ruined eventually.

32 posted on 03/15/2019 4:52:24 PM PDT by boop (I say without hyperbole that this is a million times worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: All

HalleluYah!


33 posted on 03/15/2019 5:06:14 PM PDT by veracious (UN=OIC=Islam ; USAgov may be radically changed, just amend USConstitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

pfl


34 posted on 03/16/2019 2:35:09 AM PDT by NoCmpromiz (John 14:6 is a non-pluralistic comment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude
Case was dropped the same day Hickenlooper announces 2020 run.........riiiiight.
35 posted on 03/16/2019 5:33:46 AM PDT by wardamneagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson