Classically Soviet of Mueller.
Muleface, did Obama commit any crimes?
Hillary DID commit crimes but the Fpartisan Bureau of Investigations said that there was ‘no intent’ to harm national security or compromise classified intel.
...it wouldnt be inaccurate to assume that I couldnt exactly not say that is or is’nt almost partially correct that I may or maynot have found some at least conceivalbe evidence that a crime may or may not have occured.
Sorry! That is how government investigation works. They never exonerate they just say they don’t have enough information to do any thing.
This, otherwise unnecessary statement, is to provide a basis for impeachment and to try and stop the Barr investigation and Trump’s declassification of incriminating documents. The coup plotters need to be brought to judgment and this makes it that much harder.
It wasn’t his job to prove President Trump didn’t obstruct anything. It was his job to prove he did and Mulehead the pussy punted on that.
Trying to wrest offensive action and press attention away from Trump/Barr/Durham progress.
Bull$hit! The fact is that you had no evidence to charge him, and it tells me you didn’t move ahead with obstruction, because you knew you’d never be able to prove it in a court of law. It’s just all smoke and mirrors.
Maybe now people will realize what we are really up against.
Just kidding. “Trust the plan”
High time to DECLASSIFY ALL DOCUMENTS!!!
EXPOSE THE REAL TRUTHS!!
I just pray that President Trump’s trust in AG Bill Barr has not been misplaced.
Remember how Barr and Mule Face have been friends for many, many years.
Hoping and praying that PDJT won’t be burned/betrayed by a second AG.
DRAIN THE SWAMP NOW!!!
I know we are all tired of arguing this stupid point and Muller did nothing but muddy the waters.
It’s time to declassify some information right now and change the headlines.
The swamp has spoken..
My best guess at this point: Mueller tried to provide his own "summary" to contrast to Barr's summary. (Which, BTW, Mueller participated in putting together.)
That’s great and all Bob, but your job is not to exonerate. Any person is presumed innocent. The state must prove otherwise to convict. You found no such evidence.
But of course you went to law school and you know that as well as I. You’re just trying to weasel hoping nobody notices your attempt to shift the burden from the state to prove guilt to Donald Trump to prove innocence. Well, we noticed. Your little ploy has failed.
So not saying he did and not saying he didn't. That gives ammunition to both sides.
More the other way around: If we had evidence that the president committed a crime we would have said so, but we found no evidence whatsoever.
Has he ever heard “ innocent until proven guilty”? It is NOT “guilty until proven innocent”
18 more months of kaos, get out the popcorn!