Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/29/2019 8:30:10 AM PDT by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last
To: Hojczyk

Democrats will impeach him after this..


2 posted on 05/29/2019 8:30:58 AM PDT by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Ah, as we all know: slime oozes.

QED


3 posted on 05/29/2019 8:31:03 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

LOL. The ultimate mealy-mouthed non-statement. Basically, “we found no evidence, but I didn’t want to clear him.” This is the exact inverse of the Comey Hillary Clinton statement: “We found all sorts of evidence, but she didn’t mean to do anything, so we are clearing her.”


4 posted on 05/29/2019 8:32:05 AM PDT by Antoninus ("In Washington, swamp drain you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Can’t prove a negative, Bob.


5 posted on 05/29/2019 8:32:42 AM PDT by rjsimmon (The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Trying to shift attention away from investigating the investigators


7 posted on 05/29/2019 8:33:02 AM PDT by griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

He read the headline that was written for him! That’s all they needed.


8 posted on 05/29/2019 8:33:20 AM PDT by JWNM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

What the hell kind of double talk is this???


9 posted on 05/29/2019 8:33:22 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd ( Import the third world and you'll become the third world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Mueller sickens me........
.....now the hate Trump ......crowd, the uglies, ie Napolitano, Hume, etc are on TV crowing impeachment.


10 posted on 05/29/2019 8:33:27 AM PDT by Guenevere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Some people are getting very scared. Nothing about this is normal.

Mueller submitted his report. If he had anything to say or any evidence that was the time!
“If we had confidence the president DID NOT commit a crime we would have said so.” You cannot prove a negative!

We are living in interesting times.


12 posted on 05/29/2019 8:33:46 AM PDT by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Why not? Cause you could not:-)


13 posted on 05/29/2019 8:33:47 AM PDT by Harpotoo (Being a socialist is a lot easier than having to WORK like the rest of US:-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk
“If we had confidence the president DID NOT commit a crime we would have said so. We did not however make a determination if the president did commit a crime.”

BS. He is supposed to refer if he sees a crime. There is no in between. That is NOT the standard by which he operates.

"We are sure there is a crime there. We just could not find it so we had to not say it..." Complete and total BS.

15 posted on 05/29/2019 8:33:52 AM PDT by gunsequalfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Well, what crime do you think he might have committed?


16 posted on 05/29/2019 8:33:55 AM PDT by Steely Tom ([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

This has got to be the only time in recorded history that the witch hunter has failed to prove the witch.

That factoid really, really, really bothers Mueller..


17 posted on 05/29/2019 8:34:37 AM PDT by null and void (The press is always lying. When they aren't actively lying, they are actively concealing the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Can’t prove a negative, he could have easily said, if we had evidence he had committed a crime of obstruction we would present it, we don’t.


18 posted on 05/29/2019 8:34:43 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

That is a BS statement that ANY reputable prosecutor or investigator would never make. Yeah, I know...


20 posted on 05/29/2019 8:35:09 AM PDT by JWNM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

A lot of words but the same bottom line: no charges for collusion or obstruction.


21 posted on 05/29/2019 8:35:11 AM PDT by Lisbon1940 (No full-term Governors (at the time of election))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

****If***** we had confidence.......................

Translation: Dang shoot rats darn it.......................

Enron Mueller mucks up again.


22 posted on 05/29/2019 8:35:24 AM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Not for nothing, but those statements seem to cancel each other out.


24 posted on 05/29/2019 8:35:40 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Nothing new here except a public statement saying he won’t provide any additional details to the House committee.


29 posted on 05/29/2019 8:36:22 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Hey Mueller, you can retire but you can’t run.


32 posted on 05/29/2019 8:36:32 AM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson