Posted on 07/06/2019 7:32:23 AM PDT by vg0va3
I mean, I get all this information about other peoples pasts, and what theyve done and not done. And you know, Im just not going to go there. If we keep doing that I mean, we should be debating what we do from here," Biden told CNN in a Friday interview, referring to the crowded field of two dozen White House hopefuls."
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...
Most liberals are.
And like most of people, they think all other people are just like them.
They know what they would do if I (they) had a rocket launcher.
They assume we would too.
Small wonder the want us disarmed!
Leni
Part of the Obama era surveilance on American citizens, strained by team Obama to ferret out political intel?
That’s the first thing I thought about, too.
So Obamas spies turned everything over to Biden.
They didn’t give him squat.
Team 0 may be dumb, but not crazy.
We're gonna need a bigger tub of popcorn....
Hell take out Heels Up Harris first.....
Are you kidding?! ...the mediaVOMITS would NEVER snitch on their chosen queen!! They Learned their lesson with the she-devil Hitlery ....from here on you’ll only hear nothing but glowing reports on walks on water she-messiah!! Mark it it’s going to be absolutely SICKENING!!!!
That is a threat, and one hell of a campaign commercial
Primary and General.
How about obama’s past? How about info on Big Mike?
He sniffed it out.
Is that what the entertainment industry refers to as Political Porn.....
Technically, GW Bush was the President that started this level of total surveilance on American citizens.
Recall that Admiral John Poindexter was put in charge of the "Total Information Awareness (TIA) project in February 2003.
In May 2003 it was renamed, "Terrorist Information Awareness" in an effort to halt the flow of criticism on its information gathering practices on average citizens. It turned out that these criticisms were completely warranted and accurate.
TIA was part of the President's Surveillance Program created by GW Bush immediately following the attacks on September 11, 2001.
The last presidential authorization expired on February 1, 2007, but some of the collection activities were continued, first under the authority of the Protect America Act of 2007, passed in August of that year, and then under the FISA Amendments Act (FAA), which was enacted in July 2008.
The act required the Inspectors General of all intelligence agencies involved in the program to "complete a comprehensive review" of the activities through January 17, 2007, and produce an unclassified report within one year after enactment. The report published on July 10, 2009 concluded that the President's program involved "unprecedented collection activities" that went far beyond the scope of the Terrorist Surveillance Program. The report raised questions over the legal underpinnings of the authorizations, a lack of oversight, excessive secrecy, and the effectiveness of the program. The report concluded that the program was built on a "factually flawed" legal analysis.
Public disclosure of the Terrorist Surveillance Program in 2005 ignited the NSA warrantless surveillance controversy.
I recall TIA being discussed at the time here on FR and the general consensus is that it would not just allow, but, invite, the types of abuses we've seen with Trump.
The propaganda media mentions something like the Kamala-Brown affair one time at 2 a m on a holiday weekend, being careful to use a misleading headline. Then forever after, they say that they covered it .
"I don't remember what any of the information *is*, but I recall discussing it with the British Prime Minister, Benjamin Disraeli."
Of course -- same source as the Steele Dossier. Good luck with that. Thanks vg0va3.
the entertainment industry refers to as Political Porn.
Generally speaking, the entertainment industry is Political Porn.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.