Whatever.
I was among the few here at the beginning who screamed, “Why are we accepting Big Media’s word that they were lovers?!”
I recall a few here telling me that there seemed to be no reason to believe they were NOT lovers, and “They’ve got the texts.”
Many here still really, REALLY want to believe Big Media, especially whne it’s not seemingly DIRECTLY related to politics.
Am also saddened by how many here keep being surprised at how low our domestic enemies will go.
Page always seemed to me to be one of the thousands of single women in DC....single and nearing forty, with no marriage or BF. A lot of them simply have some guy they know (doesn’t qualify for BF status) that they meet for drinks and an hour in the sack...once or twice a month. It’s not a relationship and I doubt if it qualifies as an affair.
"Mr. Smith goes to Washington" and is shocked, I tell you, at what he finds.
Hey, MSM, this is NOT news. She was a married woman having an illicit office affair and trying to keep it secret. She was always lying about it. That was known from the time it first came out. SHEESH!
Well, “it’s just sex” and there was “no criminal intent”. “No reasonable prosecutor” would pursue this.
CALLED IT A YEAR AGO.
They only used that angle so that much of their texts could be omitted as ‘lover’s conversations’ and so on. Also, it seems a lot less sinister if they’re just two close lovers saying this casually instead of actually saying this on the job. Then it sounds like conspiracy.
Lying about an affair is not a particularly high crime. I almost don’t blame Clinton for lying about Monica.
That’s because an affair is usually none of the public’s business.
Am I wrong here?
I will be adding the book “Deep State” to my reading list.
I hear this is Stewarts attempt to expose the deep state as the savior of the nation in his view.
Well, she is a lawyer so must have just been default behavior. ;-)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them
Considering Peter Strzok, it’s reasonable that she was embarrassed to the point of mortification. Who wouldn’t be?
Unless she wasn’t lying and the affair was just an excusee for more redactions.
BOngino. Whom I LOVE, actually BELIEVES MIST of her testimony!!! NOT ME!
I wouldn’t admit to getting boinked by that jerk either. (If I were a gal, and doubly so as a guy). ;)
GUESS WHO?....................
Among the other revelations in 'Deep State' is that former deputy attorney general Rod Rosenstein had the support of two cabinet colleagues for invoking the 25th Amendment to remove Trump from office. Stewart claims that it was former chief of staff John Kelly and former Attorney General Jeff Sessions who said they might back it. Pictured: Rosenstein and Sessions .................