Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report: Mitch McConnell Likely to Acquit Trump, Not Dismiss Impeachment Charges
Breitbart ^ | December 12, 2019 | JOSHUA CAPLAN

Posted on 12/12/2019 10:15:54 AM PST by maggief

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is expected to acquit President Donald Trump in the Senate if he’s impeached in the House, not just dismiss the charges against him, two senators told CNN on Wednesday.

CNN reports:

Republicans want to have a vote on acquittal — to clear the President of the charges against him — not simply rely on a 51-vote threshold procedural motion to dismiss the hotly disputed case.

The Constitution mandates 67 votes are required to convict the President and remove him from office, a barrier widely considered too high to be reached in this case.

One vote McConnell can’t rely on is that of Vice President Mike Pence, who has “no role in impeachment,” according to a GOP leadership aide, despite being president of the Senate with the mandate to break ties.

One of the senators, speaking anonymously, said McConnell would not call a vote on a motion to proceed to the impeachment articles unless he knew he had the 51 votes needed to end the trial, which would then set up a final vote on the articles themselves. On that final vote, 67 votes would be needed to convict Trump and remove him from office.

Speaking to CNN on the record, Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) argued that it “would make more sense” to vote on impeachment articles than on a motion to dismiss. Cornyn noted the second option would mean the Senate would “decide this on a 51-vote threshold, with the potential tie and all the recriminations that would flow from that.”

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: uniparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: Starboard

In fact, has Trump already caved on the Chinese tariffs?

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/trump-folds-offers-cancel-new-tariffs-will-cut-existing-tariffs-50-exchange-plefges


41 posted on 12/12/2019 11:45:46 AM PST by bkopto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: bkopto

“his wife is Chinese and she is related to chinese businessmen. “

They already do hugely benefit financially from ties to China, and who knows if all of their relationships are on the up-and-up. (Have hard they are questionable ethically/legally.)


42 posted on 12/12/2019 11:56:49 AM PST by MayflowerMadam ("I've read the back of The Book, and we win.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Whatever McConnell decides will be what Trump wants. Don’t kid yourselves.


43 posted on 12/12/2019 11:59:48 AM PST by Hildy (Don't get bitter, get better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kozak
Yeah, that shitbag Graham wants to avoid witnesses etc because “this is tearing the country apart”.

He doesn't realize, as he doesn't breathe the same air as most of us peons, the country is already torn apart. And to his detriment doesn't understand many of us while supporting Mr. Trump won't vote for down ticket Republicans who support the "quick deal"!

44 posted on 12/12/2019 12:07:24 PM PST by ImpBill (Conservative voter sans political Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
It was not a REAL with witnesses. It was a deal between Trent Lott and Tom Daschle to put on a faux trial and then vote to acquit. I watched it as well as the House Impeachment hearings.

I am not saying it will happen again, but it sure looks that way based upon McConnell and Graham statements today.

45 posted on 12/12/2019 12:11:36 PM PST by ImpBill (Conservative voter sans political Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: TheNext; All

Impeachment alone or impeachment with a guilty verdict at the trial in the Senate?

It’s interesting, I was also thinking that if Trump’s Presidency is nullified, that is seen as never been valid, then he could run for two more terms.

If it’s impeachment alone, that would drive the dems even crazier.

Trump finishing out this term and running in 2020 and 2024.


46 posted on 12/12/2019 12:25:40 PM PST by Syncro (Facts is Facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: maggief

No. Don’t do it. Acquittal does nothing to prove Trump’s innocence while giving the slime party a pass to do it again.


47 posted on 12/12/2019 12:26:11 PM PST by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheNext

“Trump serves 2016 2017 2018 and 3/4ths of 2019.”

Trump wasn’t President until Jan 20, 2017.


48 posted on 12/12/2019 12:33:50 PM PST by Syncro (Facts is Facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Do “they” have to continue once the House of Reps. make a decision? End this political morass now......a worse travesty against the Constitution, couldn’t be imagined. Give President Trump a medal for Presidential Achievement and Bravery Under Fire.


49 posted on 12/12/2019 12:46:13 PM PST by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

Exactly, and don’t forget about Mitt Romney, aka Pierre Delecto. Who elected that slug anyway? Oh yea, it was Utah. Shame on you Utah for slinging that slime ball on the rest of the country. What the hell were you thinking?


50 posted on 12/12/2019 1:19:41 PM PST by abbastanza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

Absolutely nothing can legitimize that damn circus.

The Republicans have all done a great job, but those drooling dems need to be made to disappear.


51 posted on 12/12/2019 3:30:24 PM PST by Gator113 ( ~~Trump 2020 and again in 2024. EPSTEIN WAS MURDERED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TheNext
Trump serves 12 years if impeached and removed.

That's unconstitutional. The Constitution says that no one may serve more than two terms as president.

52 posted on 12/12/2019 7:56:02 PM PST by Windflier (Torches and pitchforks ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

7 and 3/4 years is only 1 term due to removal.

11 and 3/4 years is 2 terms.

I know math is hard.


53 posted on 12/13/2019 2:49:10 AM PST by TheNext (LeGaBiT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: TheNext
7 and 3/4 years is only 1 term due to removal. 11 and 3/4 years is 2 terms. I know math is hard.

U.S Constitution - 22nd Amendment:

Section 1. "No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once."

I know. English is hard.

54 posted on 12/13/2019 5:34:41 AM PST by Windflier (Torches and pitchforks ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

A conviction of the impeachment can include the condition that the impeached may longer hold any office of trust or profit in government. The Senate should have done this when they removed Alcee Hastings from the bench - instead, the House is now stuck with that pustule for the rest of his life. They would almost certainly include this condition in any conviction of Trump. Not only would he never be able to hold the office of President again, he would be lucky to avoid subsequent imprisonment in New York State on phony tax evasion charges.


55 posted on 12/13/2019 5:44:06 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves ([CTRL]-[GALT]-[DELETE])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
U.S Constitution Article II Section 1

“President of the United States of America.
He shall hold his Office during the Term of four Years”

Black's Law Dictionary

Amendments cannot modify a Constitution.

Is anybody here not subservient to communists?

56 posted on 12/13/2019 7:03:36 AM PST by TheNext (LeGaBiT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Theophilous Meatyard III

I’m also optimistic about the percentage of honorable Americans with common sense.

**************

Years ago I would have been inclined to agree with you. But the country has changed in very profound ways in recent decades. Our fellow countrymen seem to be gullible and easily manipulated. Note that we keep electing and re-electing the same old lying, self-serving and deceitful scoundrels again and again. That’s not indicative of common sense or respect for honor in my humble opinion.

That said, I hope you’re right.


57 posted on 12/13/2019 7:09:35 AM PST by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: TheNext
Black's Law Dictionary.
Amendments cannot modify a Constitution.

Take it up with the Framers. Black's Law Dictionary does not supersede the Constitution.

The 22nd Amendment says that no one may be elected to the office of president more than twice.

58 posted on 12/13/2019 7:47:44 AM PST by Windflier (Torches and pitchforks ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

So you universalky invalidate all legal contracts like the Constitution. Sweet.

Stalin & Marx loves you conservatives, you make their job too easy.

So you can amend your home mortgage to quit paying on even years. Sweet.


59 posted on 12/13/2019 8:38:52 AM PST by TheNext (LeGaBiT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson