Posted on 03/14/2022 8:32:56 PM PDT by hardspunned
The topic is indeed about borders. There as here. To attempt to limit a debate does not advance any discussion.Actually the topic here is about peaceful Ukraine being invaded by Russia. If it was about borders then someone could post about the border between any two countries for any reason under the sun, to which I would make the same reply.
The reply I made by the way, was not limiting or denying free speech. You should be careful with such a garbage accusation. I asked if she wanted to post about the southern US border if she could start a thread on that topic since it doesn't include Ukraine. There is a concept known as "thread hijack" and a lot of people don't appreciate someone doing so.
I think Putin a complete a**hole, but also think we all owe him some measure of thanks and perhaps the 2022 Nobel Prize in Medicine for ending Covid.
EVERY Amnesty Senator.
Grahamnesty, Rubio, Cornyn, etc.
Cuban Micro Rubio and Cubanadian Ted Cruz are not natural born citizens and it is also embarrassing how many freepers are ignorant on that issue, too.
Thread title -- "Tucker Carlson Notes the Moonbat Crazy Over Ukraine is Bipartisan"
Your first reply on this thread altered the topic, as above, to American troops, not Carlson's stance. Your second reply, to post the Newsweek article, was on topic. For this your were sarcastically thanked for "an example of the FR media echo chamber." And then Jane Long commented. Your third reply on this thread described another's comment as "childish." Then a number of comments were addressed to you, and your response to Jane Long was about what the thread topic was, from which you'd already strayed. She responded, able to care of herself, to which you suggested that you made a "point which flew right over [ her ] head."
So much for you as self-appointed monitor of a thread. As to the Tucker Carlson editorial and your complaint about him, I shall agree with the late comment to you in the form of a graphic, showing Bush, Obama, Biden, Soros, Mrs. Clinton and others as apparently agreeing with you and Newsweek.
As Americans, all sides are protected in their speech, and I don't find an FR rule about "thread hijack." The Carlson thesis was about how craziness is become "bipartisan," and now partisans want to enroll him as a guilty party and traitor. I read the great sense of Bastiat and Smith, but also the lunacy of Marx and Engels, to be informed. This last sentence may be construed as a "thread hijack," if you wish.
Yes it is. Its amazing how many here are prepared to just swallow hook, line and sinker the propaganda put out by the very same corporate media organizations that they freely acknowledge have lied to us about everything for years and years.
Look who is on the other side. Who is lined up with Zelensky/the Kiev government? Darth Schwab. George Soros. The Clintons, The Bidens. Obama. The EU. Big Tech. The Corporate Media.
That alone should make you pause and think that maybe, you aren’t being presented the whole history. Maybe you don’t know the motives of everyone involved (because lying about their real motives is what these people do constantly). Maybe you aren’t being told the whole story.
agree
You mean the Putin who is using Muslim Chechen soldiers in Ukraine?
I’m not interested in your loser opinion any more than the last time you offered it.
I think we should go to war in Ukraine to protect congress’s money laundering and bribery.
They may give us a few crumbs....
You got kids in uniform or know any? Seems like a waste for a few crumbs.
I understand what Zelensky wants and why - I also understand what Putin wants and why. However I differ with your assessment on what is seen as security issues or threats.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.