The plans libtards come up with are payback schemes for friends and business partners. They are also never created to ever be successful and fix the problems.
Government has no incentive to solve problems, only create them.
Lock up drug dealers and buyers. Institutionalize the mentally ill who are self-medicating.
When you encourage certain behavior by encouraging and monetizing it, you get more of the same, not less. Most people learn that lesson very early in life.
California has an entire tax-payer funded work-force devoted to making sure that homeless people stay homeless. Their budget grows each year for them to “address the problem”. Those departments’ goal is to have more people on the street, not less.
They wanted to solve homelessness by giving the drug addicts free housing and word got around. Which promoted more drug addicts to move to San Francisco.
Ping
Housing will fix homelessness? No it won’t.
People are homeless because they’re strung out on drugs and alcohol and don’t pay their bills. Trying to put them in govt paid housing just makes the problem worse and solves nothing.
Does govt never learn anything from experience?
Think about this for 2 seconds. They could give each of the 2,700 “chronically homeless” people a check for $481,000.
Homeless shelters get just as much money if no one stays overnight... and it's easier. Switch the incentives by giving vouchers to the homeless. Shelters don't get a dime unless 'the homeless' give them a chit for the night's stay.
The Soviets were infamous for their vaunted 5 Year Plan. During the final year of the Plan, they would edit, correct the record to prove the original Plan was perfect, and all the results coincided with the original (edited) Plan. Right out of 1984.
Anyone challenging the ‘facts on the ground’ were deemed incorrect comrades, and with a little, or a lot, of re-education, their minds were righted.
You might think so, but it hasn't. "Housing", after all, is a tent on the street so long as the weather cooperates. It may be time to stop focusing on the box and start focusing on the contents. "Too many rules" means simply "I can't get high there"...or worse. It astonishes me that people who constantly rant about "root causes" are the very last actually to face them. The challenge is to separate the people who have genuinely encountered impossible economic circumstances and will rebuild their lives given a chance from those who are fine with squalor and don't want the boat rocked. There are sadly a lot of the latter.
I went to my office on the edge of the Tenderloin today. Lots of druggies as usual but these days also lots of “community volunteers” (they can be as loud as the screaming homeless around my building, oddly) and more police cars around at least. Thankfully the needle exchange open air drug market in un plaza (the linkage center) that made worldwide news and scorn will not be funded anymore soon. What a disastrous expensive wasteful idea THAT was.
The math is very simple:
Every Five Year Plan to cut the number of bums and druggies by half doubles it.
Pay more for something and get more of it.
if they wanna solve their homeless problem- ship em all to Martha’s Vinyard
If you want more of something, subsidize it.
Well if they did “cut them in half” they would naturally have twice as many.
“The changes in city leadership slowed the effort.” Yup. Just as changes in leadership prevented a solution to the homeless problem in SF, so, too, changes in US leadership prevented a solution to the terrorist problem in Afghanistan. Thankfully, the permanent leadership of the Lord allows the solutions to every problem.
340 million in salaries and 10 million for bus tickets.
Isn't it funny how the more money the government makes available to "combat homelessness", the more "homeless" appear to get that money?