Posted on 10/14/2023 4:36:07 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
CANBERRA, Australia (AP) — Australians resoundingly rejected on Saturday a referendum proposal to create an advocacy committee to offer advice to Parliament on policies that affect Indigenous people — the nation's most disadvantaged ethnic minority.
The government proposed the first constitutional change since 1977 as a step forward in Indigenous rights. But the vote divided Indigenous leaders as well as the wider community.
More than 59% of voters opposed the so-called Voice to Parliament with almost half the votes counted by Saturday. The loss is unofficial but is not contested.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese blamed his political opponents' campaigning against the measure for the failure. No referendum has ever succeeded without support of the major parties.
Prime Minister Albanese promised on the day he was elected last year to hold the referendum and accepted responsibility for his government's decision to proceed despite evidence it was doomed.
“I had a duty, as a conviction politician, to put that to the Australian people,” Albanese told reporters.
Bipartisan support is widely regarded as essential for an Australian referendum's success. Only eight of 45 referendums have succeeded in the constitution's 122-year history.
Voice advocate Tanya Hosch, who spent a decade on developing the model, said she was devastated by the result.
“There's going to be a lot of pain and hurt and dismay and we’re going to need to take a moment to absorb that message and what it says,” Hosch said.
Voice advocates had hoped that listening to Indigenous views would lead to more effective delivery of government services and better outcomes for Indigenous lives.
Opponents said the Voice would divide Australians along racial lines without reducing Indigenous disadvantages. They also said it could be a first step toward Indigenous claims for repatriation and compensation.
(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...
“The prime minister was warned over the course of the last 16 or 17 months not to proceed with this divisive referendum and he owes the Australian public an apology for that,” Dutton said.
This is just another United Nations’ scheme to institute a totalitarian world government with them in charge.
https://www.ohchr.org/en/indigenous-peoples/un-declaration-rights-indigenous-peoples
Voting this down probably helped to save Australia.
All they had to do was look at the USA to find out if having a “sovereign nation” wholly within a sovereign nation actually works.
I was in Australia just two weeks ago. The vote “YES” ads were all over the place. But talking to the people, including my friends and ex-colleagues tells me that th Aussies were not fooled by government propaganda. The only demographic I noticed who were inclined to vote “Yes” were the under 30’s.
I knew that the “yes” vote would fail and it did.
Good. When one group is deemed superior, all others are inferior... by definition.
As in my handle.
It was, by definition, racist.
Would that the gullible half of the American electorate were so wise.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.