Skip to comments.
Utterly Ungracious Attitude & Behavior of Hillary Clinton During This Time
Free Republic ^
Posted on 09/14/2001 3:06:54 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-176 next last
To: Slyfox
Im glad all you folks have this tragedy in good perspective. You should all go cool off... you sound like a bunch of losers.
21
posted on
09/14/2001 3:33:46 PM PDT
by
koda
To: Hidy
I learned on CNN that Chelsea was 12 blocks from the world trade center. They did not mention the names of the other 1 Million people located within 12 blocks of the world trade center, and more particularly they did not mention the names of the 10,000's who were in the world trade center.
You would think - according to CNN - this whole thing was a publicity stunt for the x1st family.
To: Recovering_Democrat
Hitlery
A political turd waiting to be flushed down the toilet of the next election.
23
posted on
09/14/2001 3:36:35 PM PDT
by
aruanan
To: Selara
"As much as I disapproved of Bill's past and ongoing antics, he looked alive and human. Hillary, on the other hand, looked dead and full of hate."That's 'cause Bill just got him some down in Australia...........probably a lot. Hill probably hasn't had any since Vince bit the bullet.
To: Recovering_Democrat
Noticed she and @sshole dragged the brat with them today. Never miss a photo op. Didn't notice anyone else there with their kids.
To: Recovering_Democrat
Gore and Clinton out of the country when this tragedy happens. think about it.
26
posted on
09/14/2001 3:38:30 PM PDT
by
dalebert
To: Recovering_Democrat
(This from http://www.boortz.com/nealznuze.htm 9-13-01)
(RECALL THIS INFORMATION EACH AND EVERY TIME HITLERY POPS UP ON THE CLINTON NEWS NETWORK DURING THE HOUR OR SO OF FREE AIR TIME CNN GIVES HER EACH DAY. GIVEN HER MISERABLE, DOMINEERING PERSONALITY AND THE NATURE OF THEIR RELATIONSHIP, YA JUST GOTTA KNOW SHE HAD A HAND IN ALL OF THIS. Dick Bachert not Boortz. But I feel sure Neal would concur.)
Remember Pan Am 103? Thats the airplane that was brought down by a bomb over Scotland. One Libyan terrorist has been convicted. Was the Libyan government held responsible? There was ample evidence that Kadaffy (there are 341 ways to spell it) was part of the plot. Did we go after him? Hardly. Seth Lipsky, writing in todays Wall Street Journal, tells us that the Clinton Administration even acted on behalf of Libya to prevent families of the victims from pressing claims against the Libyan government. Oh, and that convicted bomber? Guess whos has joined in handling his appeal --- not in American courts, but in the Scottish courts. None other than our Clintonista pal, Alan Dershowitz.
So --- just why did the Clinton Administration work so hard to keep Libya from paying for the Pan Am 103 bombing? Maybe theres a good reason
so, what is it?
Theres more:
American citizen Alisa Flatow was killed in an Iranian funded terrorist attack in Israel. Our congress passed a law that allowed American victims of terrorism to sue in court. Soverign immunity for acts of terrorism was removed by that law. Alisa Flatows family sued, and won a big judgment. When the Flatow family tried to collect under the law the Clinton Administration stepped in and argued against the Flatow family in court. Clinton wanted the Iranians to be allowed to keep their property and assets.
So how is this for fighting terrorism? American citizens are victimized by terrorists. They work through the legal processes even under a law passed by our own congress to recover damages from the parties responsible. Then along comes Bill Clinton and his gang to protect ---- who? The victims? NO! The terrorists!
Can someone please explain this to me?
To: Recovering_Democrat
Well...honestly now, you're not really surprised are you ?
28
posted on
09/14/2001 3:43:59 PM PDT
by
pgkdan
To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton
The echo is probably coming from Hildebeasts empty head. I thought it was great today when the rescue workers barked at GW. Obviously GW appeals to the genuine male types. What a difference between them and the sniveling snots that love Billy boy.
29
posted on
09/14/2001 3:45:38 PM PDT
by
willyone
To: leilani
30
posted on
09/14/2001 3:46:41 PM PDT
by
backhoe
(Has that clinton "legacy" made you feel *safer* yet? ? ?)
To: Recovering_Democrat
This is the weak resolution the Senate is working on. Compare it to a real declaration of war from 1941SJ 22 ES
107th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. J. RES. 22
JOINT RESOLUTIONExpressing the sense of the Senate and House of Representatives regarding the terrorist attacks launched against the United States on September 11, 2001.
Whereas on September 11, 2001, terrorists hijacked and destroyed four civilian aircraft, crashing two of them into the towers of the World Trade Center in New York City, and a third into the Pentagon outside Washington, D.C.;
Whereas thousands of innocent Americans were killed and injured as a result of these attacks, including the passengers and crew of the four aircraft, workers in the World Trade Center and in the Pentagon, rescue workers, and bystanders;
Whereas these attacks destroyed both towers of the World Trade Center, as well as adjacent buildings, and seriously damaged the Pentagon; and
Whereas these attacks were by far the deadliest terrorist attacks ever launched against the United States, and, by targeting symbols of American strength and success, clearly were intended to intimidate our Nation and weaken its resolve: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress--
(1) condemns in the strongest possible terms the terrorists who planned and carried out the September 11, 2001, attacks against the United States, as well as their sponsors;
(2) extends its deepest condolences to the victims of these heinous and cowardly attacks, as well as to their families, friends, and loved ones;
(3) is certain that the people of the United States will stand united as our Nation begins the process of recovering and rebuilding in the aftermath of these tragic acts;
(4) commends the heroic actions of the rescue workers, volunteers, and State and local officials who responded to these tragic events with courage, determination, and skill;
(5) declares that these premeditated attacks struck not only at the people of America, but also at the symbols and structures of our economic and military strength, and that the United States is entitled to respond under international law;
(6) thanks those foreign leaders and individuals who have expressed solidarity with the United States in the aftermath of the attacks, and asks them to continue to stand with the United States in the war against international terrorism;
(7) commits to support increased resources in the war to eradicate terrorism;
(8) supports the determination of the President, in close consultation with Congress, to bring to justice and punish the perpetrators of these attacks as well as their sponsors; and
(9) declares that September 12, 2001, shall be a National Day of Unity and Mourning, and that when Congress adjourns today, it stands adjourned out of respect to the victims of the terrorist attacks.
Passed the Senate September 12, 2001.
Compare this wimpy drivel to this:
JOINT RESOLUTION
Declaring that a state of war exists between the Imperial Government of Japan and the Government and the people of the United States and making provisions to prosecute the same.
Whereas the Imperial Government of Japan has committed unprovoked acts of war against the Government and the people of the United States of America:
Therefore be it Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the state of war between the United States and the Imperial Government of Japan which has thus been thrust upon the United States is hereby formally declared;
and the President is hereby authorized and directed to employ the entire naval and military forces of the United States and the resources of the Government to carry on was against the Imperial Government of Japan; and, to bring the conflict to a successful termination, all of the resources of the country are hereby pledged by the Congress of the United States.
Approved, December 8, 1941, 4:10 p.m. E.S.T.
31
posted on
09/14/2001 3:47:25 PM PDT
by
Rome2000
To: Recovering_Democrat
I saw her address at WTC site. She did it AGAIN! She strung together a whole mess of words that didn't have a coherent thought. At this time in our Nation's history that's totally inappropiate. She also looked cold and somewhat defeated. When it's time for patriotism don't expect this tired old socialist dou%*ebag to step forward. She's an old commie hack that hates the constitution and all the freedom it stands for.
The ONLY good thing to come out of this is that she & her ilk are being exposed for the traitors that they really are. The light of liberty has been turned on but there's nowhere for the cockroaches to run!
God Bless these here United States of America and all of her Patriots!!!!
32
posted on
09/14/2001 3:48:55 PM PDT
by
timydnuc
To: Recovering_Democrat
Her appearance at ground zero was obviously a show, just like her husbands on the shores of Normandy, they don't care about anybody but themselves. I don't recall the details but I think she was stumping for her National Health Care program in 1993. Hitlery was going to do a photo op at a hospitol in a cancer ward for childern and once she saw how the children with cancer actually looked she sent them away. To do the photo op she had the hospitol staff bring in other children that looked healthier, including some of the hospitol staff's own children. Just as sickening, Pete, Dan & Tom said nothing. This person is beyond evil, a true incarnation of the real Hitler.
To: Recovering_Democrat
All of her network face time tapes from the last few days will be edited together and reshown at the next Democratic National Convention for her Presidential run. Just watch.
To: Demosthenes
~BUMP~
To: koda
koda, you sound like a Hillaryfan to me.
36
posted on
09/14/2001 3:51:36 PM PDT
by
Slyfox
To: lormand
Lady Macbeth!
37
posted on
09/14/2001 3:53:06 PM PDT
by
Chemnitz
To: anniegetyourgun
Look who else showed up.
To: Recovering_Democrat
Guess who's jealous?
To: Recovering_Democrat
I was watching Fox News today with the mass in Washington.
Why was Fox News focusing on the Hildabitch, Blubba, and "Chuggin'" Chelsea so much?
At the end of the mass when all the congregation was singing the "Battle Hymn of the Republic", I was really hoping that Fox would close in on Blubba & co. to see if they were singing. They never did.
Any bet that they were not?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-176 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson