Islamic Concept of Al-Taqiyah to infiltrate and destroy kafir countries

This article was written from a Hindu viewpoint, long before the Attack on the US. I thought a third person perspective would be a good help.

This article by Dr. Walid, a top scholar at the Islamic University, exposes our so-called secular Indian Muslims. By the doctrine of Al-Taqiyah, Muslims dominate crime syndicates, increase population by massive Bangladeshi infiltration and make temporary alliances with Dalits, Christians, etc.

In the early years of the Islamic conquest of the Arabian peninsula and in the Fatah (Arab-Islamic invasion and conquest of the upper Middle East and the outside world), a Muslim concept was devised to achieve success against the enemy (non Muslims), Al-Taqiyah. Al-Taqiyah, from the verb Ittaqu, means linguistically dodge the threat. Politically it means simulate whatever status you need in order to win the war against the enemy ...

According to Al-Taqiyah, Muslims were granted the Shar'iyee right (legitimacy) to infiltrate the Dar el-Harb (war zone), infiltrate the enemy's cities and forums and plant the seeds of discord and sedition. These agents were acting on behalf of the Muslim authority at war, and therefore were not considered as lying against or denouncing the tenants of Islam.

They were "legitimate" mujahedeen, whose mission was to undermine the enemy's resistance and level of mobilization. One of their major objectives was to cause a split among the enemy's camp while downplaying the issues related to Islam ("Oh, I am not religious." "Oh, that is not Islam, you are mistaken, there is so much misinformation." "Oh, it is in the interpretation." "Brother, Islam is all about peace and love and music just like in the 60s.") In many instances, they convinced their targeted audiences that Jihad is not aimed at them, that indigenous people are not targeted. Meanwhile the (allegedly) "un Islamic" Muslims continued their attacks on the target's property and life (e.g. Lashkar-e Toyiba, Mujahideen and Osama Bin Laden's declaration of war against innocent American civilians).

They convinced many Jews that they will be protected from Christians, and they convinced many Christians that Jews were the mortal enemies, because they killed Issa (Jesus). They convinced the Aramaics, Copts, and Hebrews that the enemy is Greece, and signed peace agreements with the Bysantines Greeks at the expense of Maronite Aramaics, etc.

They convinced the knitted diversity of India to degrade into civil war by introduction of a variant Buddhist / mystical Islam (Sufism which is decried as "deviant Islam" used to ease the transition of new recruits from local communities) creating divisions (based on Muslim - Non Muslim) eventually fomenting unrest and chaos in the land to prepare it for waves of armed Invasion (Mohammad bin Qasim, Mahmud Ghaznavi, etc.).

Even today, India is bitterly divided and getting slowly Islamised as battle lines form between hordes of overzealous Muslims (armed and trained in madrasahs) and the more pacifist civilians of urban dwellings.

This Jihadic agency of subversion was one of the most fascinating and efficient arms of the conquest. In less than four decades, the Middle East fell to the Arab-Islamic rule [since Arab society was divided again between pagan and Muslim resulting in nephews and sons killing their uncles and fathers in cold blood] followed by North Africa and Central Asia [this was the era of hordes like tribal conquests where barbaric savages invaded pacifist civilians in towns of major civilizations; the same scenario replayed itself against the Arab-Islamic world with the Invasion of the Mongolian hordes].

Al-Taqiyah was a formidable weapon, used by the first dynasties and strategists. Today, scholars may identify it as deception. But the Jihadic deception was and still is more powerful than the James Bondian methods of Western classical intelligence tactics, for the simple reason that it has a civilizational, global dimension versus the narrow State interest of the regular Western subversive methods.

Al-Taqiyah is still in use today (and is widely practised and acknowledged by the Shi'ite sect) but not necessarily State-organized. Arab-Islamic missionaries are slowly converting the disillusioned criminal classes of the Western world by feeding them a Western "moderate" version of Islam (at the same time denouncing the actions of Muslims in the rest of the world as Un Islamic e.g. Taliban, GIA & FIA [Armed Islamic Front] of Algeria, Hamas, Lashkar -e Toyiba, Bin Laden and company, etc.)

It is done to prevent the new converts from seeing the real face of Islam; at least until their faith or mental conditioning is strong enough to make them turn against their own country and people.

A good example is the growing influence of Islamists in the Americas. On the one hand, American embassies, trade facilities, soldiers and intelligence infrastructures are under attack (but denounced as un-Islamic for the benefit of the new American converts).

On the other hand, the multiplying Islamic community (due to illegal immigration, paper marriages, religious visas granted to the religious men) attempts to pass itself off as "peace loving" and patriotic. In their own circles, the same community will liberally and violently denounce America, the West and its values (freedom, individualism, secularism, capitalism, scientific materialism, benign rehabilitation of criminals, prevention of cruelty against animals, women and gay rights).

One can easily detect Taqiyah in the two discourses used by Islamist strategists. On the one hand, one comprehensive Islamist theory is attempting to mobilize the Middle East, and sometimes Western Christian leaders and intellectuals, against "evil Jews".

They are forming alliances with everyone from Animal Rights' groups (to attack the Jewish tradition of slaughter which is ironically similar in cruelty to the Islamic way) to Far Right fundamentalists (to push for censorship of critiques of Islam and attack every forward thinking movement like women's rights and gay rights).

We see considerable success on that level. And on the other hand, another Islamist comprehensive theory is attempting - with success also - to mobilize the Jews against "evil and pagan Christians".

One can easily detect the sophisticated work of Taqiyah, for the strategic objective of Islamists is to destroy the foundations of the non Muslim civilizations, as a prelude to the defeat of an isolated Israel, India, United States of America, Britain, Germany, France, Italy, Russia, Egypt, Afghanistan, etc.

Taqiyah is not a unique phenomenon in history. Many strategists from all backgrounds implemented subversion. But the uniqueness of today's Taqiyah is its success within advanced and sophisticated societies. Taqiyah is winning massively because of the immense lack of knowledge among Western elites, both Jewish and Christian.

For interesting examples of Taqiyah methods, visit Christian discussion groups and forums and note the discourse of Islamist visitors aimed at undermining the Christian perception of Jews, and visit Jewish discussion groups and forums and note the subtle anti-Christian discourse of Islamist visitors. It is really informative and fascinating.

Another case made for the total destruction of this sick, insane, genocidal culture and its attendant belief system. The entire Islamic world must be crushed and cast back into the dark Mideval hell from whence it came. They want us all dead.

Too bad that our so-called leaders have their collective heads in the sand. Unless every Arab capital is reduced to radioactive rubble, we will have no peace. Political correctness will be the death of us yet.

These smiling sincerity oozing lying Al Taqiyah practicing covert muslims should be called what they are: Trojan Horse Muslims.

Radical Islam is an insane murder cult, and "moderate" Islam is its Trojan Horse in the West.

When a Muslim smiles at you, he is thinking of Danny Pearl.

Dennis, I thought you might find some of Edward Said's comments in this OP-ED in Al-Ahram interesting. There's a lot of odious BS in it, of course, but some of his comments about Arafat, elections and homicide bombings may indicate something hopeful from your perspective.

No one who is a history buff can deny that the murderous minions of Mad Mohammed (piss be upon his head) have nothing positive to offer the world except their demise.

When I read this, I burst into audible laughter. Good one.

I will read it but even without looking I'll bet he comes down on Arafat. Many Pallies take silly swipes at Arafat while the meat of their argument is how to bring about the demise of Israel. I detest Said just by the phony NYC lefty intellectual life he leads, which Columbia University makes all possible. Here's the fraud throwing some stones on the West Bank a few years back:

Yeah -- well of course the stuff is impossible to read Dennis, but the point is Said --- an intransigent enemy of Israel and leftwing dissembler of decades standing --- a) condemns the bombings in strong language, b) blames the Palestinian leadership for the condition of the Palestinian people and calls for new leadership, abandoning Arafat, and c) acknowledges that any solution includes a State of Israel within secure borders. I thought it was worth pointing out because it came from the reprehensible Said, indicating that even among Israel's most hated enemies the intellectual justifications for opposition to Israel are in a state of flux. For that reason, Israel's supporters should be somewhat encouraged.

To me these are just latest fashionable talking points he put together with his leftist buddies up in Morningside Heights. I don’t believe anything he says is what he really feels. What you read is just an intellectual exercise to be published in an Arab newspaper and elsewhere……….. The Arabs are trying to maneuver Israel into a position where it gives up all the West Bank and Gaza for empty promises of peace. I can just see Edward Said saying he’s sorry when the Jihad and terror continue after Israel gives away West Bank and Gaza to Pallies. In fact he would never say sorry, but would have a new set of excuses and explanations why Pallies are justified in continuing to fight against Israel.

I am doubtful about peace due to the very high Palestinian and Arab birthrates which are the fuel for a never ending Jihad. Every day Hamas and the PLO look arround and are reassured by the weight of hundreds of millions of Arab Muslims behind them.……This worldwide Jihadist pressure won’t end unless Mecca/Medina/Qum are nuked and I am 100% serious. Islamic imperialism will continue until thisday of reckoning.

Are you joking? Said is as important to this war as a flea in Patagonia is to a Yak in Mongolia.

Said has a certain standing in leftwing European, Palestinian and Egyptian circles that is not negligible. Do I think he has the power to concretely alter events on the ground? No. But I do think some elements in that column are new, and Said's influence among Arab intellectuals puts those elements on the table when solutions to the current situation are discussed by Arab leaders and their advisors.

That's all I'm saying.

This is the kind of Egyptian intellectual discussion that Said contributed too. This is why I said Said's words are meaningless to me.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/703216/posts

Egyptian Academics And Educated Elite Discuss Elimination of Israel ^

Posted by Nachum
On Jun 20 1:15 PM

Arutz 7 ^ | June 18, 2002 | staff
A recent article in the Jordan Times (Monday, June 17, 2002 AP) sheds lights and startles the reader on the current state of affairs in Egypt, even among the educated elite. At a seminar entitled “After the Demise of Israel,” that country’s educated elite made know its views on the elimination of Israel, in spite of what often appears to be the leading role taken by Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak in regional piece talks and in apparent disregard for the peace treaty signed between Egypt and Israel over ten years ago. Relating to the title for the symposium, “After the...

I don't doubt any of that, dennis. I am not saying that Said is trustworthy, or that Egyptian intellectuals are either! I am just pointing out to you, because I thought it would useful knowledge for you to have, that Said made some conciliatory comments in the column I linked to. Those comments may be completely discountable, but the fact that he published them has at least some meaning which may turn out to be useful somewhere down the line.

Basically I just wanted you to be aware that he made these remarks about Arafat, elections and the unjustifiability of homicide bombings.

It doesn't mean squat what Said thinks, Arafat thinks, Bush thinks, or Sharon thinks.

As long as the terrorists desire to scuttle any peace deal short of Islamic sharia law imposed on all of "Palestine from the river to the sea", they will hold the ultimate veto card.

The rest is just worthless chatter. What counts is the terror bomb peace deal veto.

"to attack the Jewish tradition of slaughter"

Pardon me?

As a Jew I am unaware of such a "tradition". Slaughter is not a part of modern Jewish practice. There are laws regarding the slaughter of animals for food (in order to be "kosher"). Every nation has similar sanitary laws as well as laws designed to minimize the suffering of slaughtered animals.

Whatever does he mean by the "Jewish tradition of slaughter?" Perhaps references to 'burnt offerings' in the Old Testament?...

Or maybe it's our custom of barbecuing Christian babies on Passover. This is rarely done these days, because they are getting faster and harder to catch. </ sarcasm>

--Boris

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.