Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA extinguishes global-warming fire
Washington Times ^ | 2/3/02 | Patrick Michaels

Posted on 02/03/2002 8:09:01 AM PST by Ranger

Edited on 07/12/2004 3:37:16 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

It really happened. The NASA scientist who lit the bonfire of the global warming vanities with his flamboyant congressional testimony 14 years ago, has turned the hose on its dying embers.

There is now no reason for the Bush administration to give an inch on climate change. Sure, energy efficient technologies (like my Honda hybrid) are worth exploring. But there is absolutely no scientific reason for any expensive policy like the Kyoto Protocol on global warming. Mr. Bush led the world by being the first to walk away from Kyoto, and science has proven him correct.


(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: cfcs; globalwarminghoax; hanson; kyoto; kyotoprotocol; kyototreaty; nasa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: B4Ranch; It'salmosttolate; ChaseR; alphadog; TrueBeliever9; MichaelRivero...
ping
21 posted on 02/03/2002 12:27:02 PM PST by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marsh2; dixiechick2000; Helen; Mama_Bear; poet; Grampa Dave; doug from upland; WolfsView...
ping
22 posted on 02/03/2002 12:39:03 PM PST by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: madfly
The Kyoto Protocol had little to do with "protecting the earth" and everything to do with consolidation of control.
Bush and his advisors just weren't stupid enough to play their game.
23 posted on 02/03/2002 12:51:36 PM PST by freefly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Ranger
bttt
24 posted on 02/03/2002 12:53:07 PM PST by farmfriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
thanks for the flag
25 posted on 02/03/2002 12:53:38 PM PST by farmfriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Ranger
Excellent post. Here's the REAL question: What is the NEXT catastrophe the left will generate to encourage government control over the economy and people's freedom? My guess, either overpopulation (the AIDS epidemic already looks like a bust) or global COOLING. Of course, both of these are retreads of earlier scare attempts, but the socialists need some issue to pump up the UN role and to condemn the capitalist US for.
26 posted on 02/03/2002 1:10:02 PM PST by Faraday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freefly
December 30, 2001 Posted: 2:05 AM EST (0705 GMT)

CNN LINK

JAPAN CASTS ASIDE KYOTO AGREEMENT REPORT
TOKYO, Japan --Japan has effectively abandoned the Kyoto Protocol limiting greenhouse gas emissions, according to a report released Sunday.

Japanese industry groups have forced the government to drop mandatory restrictions on greenhouse gas emissions under the Kyoto agreement, making it unlikely Tokyo will be able to meet its reduction targets, the Yomiuri newspaper said.

The decision by an Environment Ministry policy board, under pressure from corporate lobbies, to impose only voluntary limits on carbon dioxide emissions would spell doom for Japan's six percent reduction goal. The newspaper quoted an unidentified member of the panel, which is drafting Japan's strategy to fight global warming, as saying there is nothing in its upcoming report that directly commits companies to cut back on polluting.

Economic slump blamed
Reducing emissions by 6 percent from the benchmark year of 1990 will be all the more formidable for Japan because the nation's carbon dioxide levels have risen about 17 percent over the past decade.

The nation's deep economic slump is also likely to make corporate Japan fight harder against any measures that increase the costs of production.

Japan plans to ratify the international treaty on global warming in June, 2002 during its regular session of Parliament.

Seeing the protocol to fruition is a matter of national pride for Japan, which basked in the international attention of brokering the deal in 1997.

However, after the United States pulled out of the pact in March, Japan questioned whether there was any meaning in ratifying it without the world's biggest industrial power -- and polluter -- on board.

Japan's decision to ratify the protocol came in November, months after European nations had collectively announced they would approve the treaty even without Washington's participation.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.


27 posted on 02/03/2002 1:24:50 PM PST by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: madfly
BUMP
28 posted on 02/03/2002 1:28:35 PM PST by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Ranger
BTTT
29 posted on 02/03/2002 1:30:44 PM PST by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ranger
Bump
30 posted on 02/03/2002 1:37:02 PM PST by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
DANG IT!

I wanted backyard palm trees and my own flock of flamingos.

31 posted on 02/03/2002 1:41:43 PM PST by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7
LOL
32 posted on 02/03/2002 1:42:45 PM PST by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Ranger
Here's why it's nice to get paid by the word.

"unwarranted economic disaster for no good reason."

If it's unwarranted, then it follows it is for no good reason.
If it is for no good reason, it is unwarranted.  But when
they pay you by the word....pad that baby  :)

33 posted on 02/03/2002 1:45:44 PM PST by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ranger
Bump for later laughter.
34 posted on 02/03/2002 1:51:17 PM PST by TigersEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Wow, honesty from the person who started this nonsense. Wha happened?
35 posted on 02/03/2002 1:51:43 PM PST by poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Thanks for the heads up!
36 posted on 02/03/2002 2:22:42 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl
I think there are 3 threads on this...I'm lost! :o) er, make that lost in the ozone, hehe
37 posted on 02/03/2002 2:24:52 PM PST by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Here are the other two:

Additional Thread by Convertiblefirebird

Here's another one, by Cincinitus Wife

38 posted on 02/03/2002 2:34:42 PM PST by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Ranger;Global Warming Hoax
I think even the National Geographic is getting the news!

Feb 2002 issue contains a map of Antarctica and very little regarding Global warming!

To find all articles tagged or indexed using Global Warming Hoax

Click here: Global Warming Hoax

39 posted on 02/03/2002 2:34:47 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Thanks for the links!!!
40 posted on 02/03/2002 2:37:37 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson