Posted on 03/21/2002 10:41:10 PM PST by xm177e2
The survey was done with LEXIS-NEXIS. Articles must include "National Desk" in their full text (so only articles from the National news desk of the New York Times are included in this analysis), and must not include the words "News Analysis" (as those are basically editorials). Unlike certain other purported studies of media bias, this survey analyses only actual news articles, and not other parts of the paper (such as letters to the editor).
"Total"--total number of articles to contain the interest group's name.
"# Liberal"/"# Conserv"--the number of articles containing the interest group's name, as well as having "liberal!" or "conserv!" within ten words.
"% Liberal"/"%Conservative"--the percentage of articles in the newspaper which contain "Liberal!" or "Conserv!" within ten words of the interest group's name.
"# Left-Wing"/"# Right-Wing"--the number of articles to contain the group's name, as well as "left-wing!" or "right-wing!" within ten words.
"!" in LEXIS-NEXIS searches is a wildcard character. "Liberal!" will pick up "Liberal," "Liberals," "Liberalism," etc.
Left-Wing Groups: | Total: | # Liberal: | % Liberal | # Left-Wing:
|
Alliance for Justice | 23 | 10 | 43 | 0 |
American Civil Liberties Union | 951 | 6 | 01 | 1 |
Brookings Institution* | 344 | 5 | 01 | 0 |
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities** | 105 | 46 | 44 | 0 |
Citizens for Tax Justice | 35 | 14 | 40 | 0 |
Congressional Progressive Caucus | 3 | 0 | 00 | 0 |
Democratic Leadership Council | 134 | 8 | 06 | 0 |
Emily's List | 44 | 2 | 05 | 0 |
Greenpeace | 62 | 0 | 00 | 0 |
Human Rights Campaign | 120 | 0 | 00 | 0 |
Handgun Control, Inc. | 74 | 1 | 01 | 0 |
Million Mom March | 26 | 1 | 04 | 0 |
Natl. Abortion Rights Action League | 59 | 0 | 00 | 0 |
Natl. Assn. for the Advancement of Color | 591 | 6 | 01 | 0 |
National Education Association | 143 | 1 | 01 | 0 |
National Organization for Women | 149 | 1 | 01 | 0 |
People for the American Way | 100 | 39 | 39 | 0 |
Planned Parenthood | 279 | 5 | 02 | 0 |
Rainbow-PUSH Coalition*** | 71 | 1 | 01 | 0 |
Sierra Club | 323 | 7 | 02 | 0 |
Southern Poverty Law Center | 94 | 2 | 02 | 0 |
Violence Policy Center | 33 | 0 | 00 | 0
|
Right-Wing Groups: | Total: | # Conservative: | % Conservative | # Right-Wing:
|
American Enterprise Institute | 151 | 39 | 26 | 0 |
Cato Institute | 63 | 21 | 33 | 0 |
Christian Coalition | 538 | 151 | 28 | 6 |
Citizens Against Government Waste | 12 | 1 | 08 | 1 |
Citizens for a Sound Economy | 18 | 5 | 28 | 0 |
Concerned Women for America | 14 | 5 | 36 | 0 |
Empower America | 39 | 28 | 72% | 0 |
Family Research Council | 176 | 92 | 52% | 0 |
Federalist Society | 27 | 23 | 85% | 1 |
Focus on the Family | 68 | 25 | 37 | 0 |
Gun Owners of America | 12 | 2 | 17 | 0 |
Heritage Foundation**** | 180 | 119 | 66% | 1 |
Hoover Institution***** | 45 | 8 | 18 | 1 |
Hudson Institute | 57 | 31 | 54% | 0 |
Institute for Justice | 68 | 38 | 56% | 0 |
Media Research Center | 14 | 8 | 57% | 1 |
Manhattan Institute | 30 | 11 | 37 | 0 |
National Rifle Association | 585 | 34 | 06 | 1 |
National Right to Life Committee****** | 197 | 12 | 06 | 0 |
National Right to Work Committee | 2 | 0 | 00 | 0 |
National Taxpayers Union | 31 | 7 | 23 | 1 |
Rutherford Institute | 66 | 23 | 35 | 2 |
* I also ran searches under the incorrect name, "Brookings Institute," which is used five times.
** The incorrect name "Center for Budget and Policy Priorities" appears 16 times.
*** Also added in instances of "Rainbow Coalition"
**** A few of these mentions were not the Heritage Foundation, but other groups whose names end with "Heritage Foundation," such as the "Hunting and Shooting Sports Heritage Foundation," the "Wyoming Heritage Foundation," the "Lewis and Clark Trail Heritage Foundation," and the "Mesorah Heritage Foundation," so they were deleted. The numbers reflect only articles about the Heritage Foundation.
***** "Hoover Institute" occurs seven times, these have been added into the results
****** Full name is "National Right to Life Committee, Inc."
The searches for "Conservative"/"Liberal" are simple w/10s, "Conserv!" and "Liberal!" The searches for "Right-Wing"/"Left-Wing" are simple w/10s, "Right-Wing!" and "Left-Wing!" An article could be counted twice, if both "Liberal" and "Left-Wing" were within ten words of the name of the group (or both "C" and "RW")
Obviously, some groups are not going to be labeled as often as others. I left out the "American Conservative Union," because it's blatantly obvious from the name it's a conservative group. Likewise, the "Congressional Progressive Caucus" is clearly a progressive, left-wing group, so it's not an example of foul play that labels are not often attached to it. Also, groups like the DLC really aren't so liberal, that's a centrist group compared to the others. Likewise, "Greenpeace" is more likely to be referred to as an "environmental" group than as a "left-wing" group. But then there are groups like "People for the American Way," which do not obviously reflect one side or the other
and this is where the bias is stunningly obvious.
Very nice suggestions. They're think tanks, which is good (I want to be comparing like to like). These are perfect, they show a lot of bias when compared to conservative think tanks. If anyone knows of any other think tanks...
The other day I pointed out the headlines to my friend who thinks I am nuts (he is liberal but not political). A classic example was the headline:
Bush Wages Terror War
I explained to him that the headline was blatantly biased. He couldn't see it until I explained the headline should read:
Administration Wages War on Terrorist, or
Bush Wages War on Terrorist...
The bells went off in his head...he saw it as plain as day.
Left-Wing Groups: | Total: | # Liberal: | % Liberal | # Left-Wing: |
Alliance for Justice | 23 | 10 | 43 | 0 |
American Association of University Women | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
American Civil Liberties Union | 951 | 6 | 01 | 1 |
Americans for Democratic Action. | 33 | 19 | 58% | 0 |
Brookings Institution* | 344 | 5 | 01 | 0 |
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace | 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities** | 105 | 46 | 44 | 0 |
Center for Law and Public Policy | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Citizens for Tax Justice | 35 | 14 | 40 | 0 |
Congressional Progressive Caucus | 3 | 0 | 00 | 0 |
Democratic Leadership Council | 134 | 8 | 06 | 0 |
Emily's List | 44 | 2 | 05 | 0 |
Greenpeace | 62 | 0 | 00 | 0 |
Human Rights Campaign | 120 | 0 | 00 | 0 |
Handgun Control, Inc. | 74 | 1 | 01 | 0 |
Institute for Policy Studies | 10 | 2 | 20 | 0 |
Million Mom March | 26 | 1 | 04 | 0 |
Natl. Abortion Rights Action League | 59 | 0 | 00 | 0 |
Natl. Assn. for the Advancement of Color | 591 | 6 | 01 | 0 |
National Education Association | 143 | 1 | 01 | 0 |
National Organization for Women | 149 | 1 | 01 | 0 |
People for the American Way | 100 | 39 | 39 | 0 |
Planned Parenthood | 279 | 5 | 02 | 0 |
Rainbow-PUSH Coalition*** | 71 | 1 | 01 | 0 |
Sierra Club | 323 | 7 | 02 | 0 |
Southern Poverty Law Center | 94 | 2 | 02 | 0 |
Violence Policy Center | 33 | 0 | 00 | 0 |
Right-Wing Groups: | Total: | # Conservative: | % Conservative | # Right-Wing: |
American Enterprise Institute | 151 | 39 | 26 | 0 |
Cato Institute | 63 | 21 | 33 | 0 |
Center for the Study of Popular Culture | 6 | 4 | 66% | 0 |
Christian Coalition | 538 | 151 | 28 | 6 |
Citizens Against Government Waste | 12 | 1 | 08 | 1 |
Citizens for a Sound Economy | 18 | 5 | 28 | 0 |
Concerned Women for America | 14 | 5 | 36 | 0 |
Empower America | 39 | 28 | 72% | 0 |
Family Research Council | 176 | 92 | 52% | 0 |
Federalist Society | 27 | 23 | 85 | 1 |
Focus on the Family | 68 | 25 | 37 | 0 |
Gun Owners of America | 12 | 2 | 17 | 0 |
Heritage Foundation**** | 180 | 119 | 66% | 1 |
Hoover Institution***** | 45 | 8 | 18 | 1 |
Hudson Institute | 57 | 31 | 54% | 0 |
Institute for Justice | 68 | 38 | 56% | 0 |
Media Research Center | 14 | 8 | 57% | 1 |
Manhattan Institute | 30 | 11 | 37 | 0 |
National Association of Scholars | 4 | 2 | 50% | 0 |
National Rifle Association | 585 | 34 | 06 | 1 |
National Right to Life Committee****** | 197 | 12 | 06 | 0 |
National Right to Work Committee | 2 | 0 | 00 | 0 |
National Taxpayers Union | 31 | 7 | 23 | 1 |
Rutherford Institute | 66 | 23 | 35 | 2 |
Young Americans for Freedom | 7 | 5 | 71% | 0 |
Two weeks from now I'll release an updated version of this, showing the number of his for liberal and conservative for the left- and right-wing organizations. I think I'll also use the search term "conservativ!" instead of "conserv!," I don't want to get false flags from words like "conservation"...
I'll also update this to check into the labeling of political figures...
Really good work. I hereby confer on you the highly coveted attaboy.
ATTABOY
My contention is that the use of labels, in and of themselves, generally have a negative connotation. Thus the widespread use of C or RW ("they're everywhere, and obviously they are a threat, hence the label") vs. L or LW ("sure, there are a few liberals, but not very many so they can't be as much of a threat"). Does that make sense?
You have actual FACTS!
Keep up the great work!
One of my pet peeves with the New York Times is the difference with which they report bill passage in congress. If a bill passes with all liberal democrat support plus a couple of liberal republicans they consider it bipartisan support. However, if all the republicans vote for a bill (which means liberals and conservatives) plus 40 or 50 dems (which means moderates and some liberal support because only a handful of dems are conservative), the New York Times will proclaim is a partisan vote.
Actually Chomsky was smart to have gotten in on the ground floor of this. His argument is that the media is owned by corporations and must, therefore, be conservative.
" However, I'd sure like to see an effective debate on NPR rather than the one sided DNC propaganda that he is presenting."
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Frankly I'd rather see NPR...sink or swim. Take it off the government "cheese"...and die a natural death or float..on it's own.
FRegards,
Here are some more of my favorite 'non-partisan' interest groups:
----------Physicians for Social Responsibility
------------ACORN
-------------Children's Defense Fund
---------------The Union of Concerned Scientists
Slightly on a tangent - here is a question. We all KNOW that Richard Mellon Scaife is some kind of wealthy demon. Who would be a counterpart of his on the left? Ted Turner? Do we EVER hear of a wealthy liberal who funds attacks on conservatives?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.