Skip to comments.
Liberty Is Overrated--Safety Should Be Our First Concern*
Ever Vigilant ^
| 06-19-2002
| Lee R. Shelton IV
Posted on 06/19/2002 11:33:59 AM PDT by sheltonmac
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-264 next last
To: cva66snipe; Askel5; The_Eaglet; ppaul; ex-snook; kidd; Snuffington; Inspector Harry Callahan; ...
BUMP (If there is any confusion, be sure to click on the source link.)
To: sheltonmac
The problem with this advice is that it is well over two centuries old, and no one back then could have imagined the dangers we face today. Life expectancy of 45. No antibiotics. Most of America was still In'jun country.
Somehow I think the above statement is completely erroneous.
To: sheltonmac
You really need to put
BARF ALERT
in the title when you post things like this.
The fact of the matter is this, when the White House was listening to the countrys feelings on a National ID card it was quick to drop any consideration of such an ID because of the outpouring of resentment of even the thought. Thsi was just after the attack when fears ran higher than they do now. The numbers of supposed supporters are totally suspect.
4
posted on
06/19/2002 11:39:07 AM PDT
by
ICE-FLYER
To: sheltonmac
If you love the constitution, you are with the terrorists!
5
posted on
06/19/2002 11:39:07 AM PDT
by
dead
To: dead
If you love the constitution, you are with the terrorists! Are you sure this is what you wnated to say???
6
posted on
06/19/2002 11:40:16 AM PDT
by
ICE-FLYER
To: sheltonmac
""Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." The problem with this advice is that it is well over two centuries old, and no one back then could have imagined the dangers we face today."Like we didn't face some of these problems in the War of 1812, the French Indian War, the Mexican American War, WWII.
I think I'll stick with Franklin.
7
posted on
06/19/2002 11:40:42 AM PDT
by
Kerberos
To: dead
If you have any privacy!? The terrorists have won!
To: sheltonmac
Liberty is overrated. Safety is what counts during times of crisis. After all, how can liberty be enjoyed if one cannot feel safe. Unfortuantely, there are plenty of people who think exactly this way, and we've been there for a long time now.
9
posted on
06/19/2002 11:41:56 AM PDT
by
Slainte
To: Kerberos
I think I'll stick with Franklin. I am with you on this. After all, around the founding it would have been much much easier to commit crime or terror. No real safeguards in place. Heck it was not too long ago you were able to knock on the door of the White House. Interesting that they say there is more danger now, there really is not, it is just more quickly transmitted to the masses that it has happened. I am sure President Lincoln would agree that he experienced terror as did others back then. Their life expectancy was very very low and anyone could have a gun. I say it is the same, just made more sensational.
To: dead; Black Agnes
Nice to see that someone got it! ;-)
To: sheltonmac
This tripe flies in the face of everything that made this nation great to start with: Rugged individualism. Instead, the author whines incessantly about "feeling safe" like some skinny little girl with a bruised knee. If you are waiting for the Feds to save your sorry a$$ like the rest of the sheeple, more power to ya - that way those of us who survive all this won't have to feed you. The only ones that they are going to save are themselves. There are a lot of us out here who don't want Uncle Sam and his long arm of the law supervising our every waking moment. We don't need more cops, we don't need another layer of government to pay for, all we need is for you sheeple to stay alert to stay alive. Quit breathing out of your mouth for a few minutes a day and pay attention to your suroundings. Report anything out of the ordinary. If we all did that, we'd be safe without having every other person in a police uniform. It's called doing your duty as an American -
not waiting for someone else to take care of you. FOR ONCE. This nation could use a little population management - and the author of this is one of those who deserve to be culled.
12
posted on
06/19/2002 11:44:58 AM PDT
by
11B3
To: sheltonmac
I would have more sympathy towards this argument is the government were doing everything they can to protect us without eroding our liberty first, but they aren't. They won't arm pilots. They won't put the military on the border. They won't crackdown on illegal immigration, and speed up deportations. They waste time strip searching grandmas from Iowa, while refusing to pay extra attention to Muslims for fear of being accused of "racial profiling". They won't tell the Saudis that we will not issue any more visas to Saudis as long as they pay suicide bombers, glorify them in their media, and promote Islamic extremism in American mosques. None of this would even require action by Congress, the Bush adminsration could do it on their own. Until they do I can't support further erosion of our freedom.
13
posted on
06/19/2002 11:47:20 AM PDT
by
Hugin
Comment #14 Removed by Moderator
To: sheltonmac
I was uncertain of the authors intentions, until
If history is any indication, every civil liberty you give up now will be promptly restored
(though he could certainly find a few total knuckleheads around here who would agree with that statement)
15
posted on
06/19/2002 11:50:29 AM PDT
by
dead
To: sheltonmac
"To those who insist on holding firm to the Constitution and making the government's job harder than it has to be, let me remind you that WE ARE AT WAR. Get behind the president and show your support. All of your worries are unfounded. If history is any indication, every civil liberty you give up now will be promptly restored once this war is over. That's a promise. This has got to be one of most clever trolls I've seen, or the most idiotic screed on FR in recent years. If history is any indication, the constitutional rights sacrificed now WILL NOT BE RESTORED once this 'war' is over. In fact, barring an armed revolution, consitutional rights will likely never be restored.
So, you can go pound sand, Mr Shelton. You are no better than a Communist, if you're willing to give up all your rights for the sake of the mere promise of 'security'. I took an oath to the US Constitution, not to any president, or any political figure. If the US government abandons the US Constitution, then it will be my duty to fight it, as it has become an enemy to the Constitution.
16
posted on
06/19/2002 11:53:02 AM PDT
by
fogarty
To: dead; sheltonmac
Of *course* all those nice little liberties will be restored...just as soon as we WIN WIN WIN! Let's ROLL!!!
To: sheltonmac
"...After all, how can liberty be enjoyed if one cannot feel safe?..." "Arbeit Macht Frei."
18
posted on
06/19/2002 11:53:41 AM PDT
by
gatex
To: sheltonmac
LIBERTY IS OVERATED?!!!!!?!?!?!! An absolutely unfathomable statement. I am speechless!!
19
posted on
06/19/2002 11:53:43 AM PDT
by
PISANO
To: sheltonmac
(If there is any confusion, be sure to click on the source link.)Indeed. Nice source.
*NOTE: This is a satirical piece designed to expose the twisted logic of the "win at all costs" crowd, and the views expressed herein should not be confused with the actual beliefs of the author.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-264 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson