Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Testimony costs flight attendant her job
SignOnSanDiego ^ | July 12, 2002 | Kristen Green

Posted on 07/12/2002 7:06:01 AM PDT by MizSterious

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 761-780 next last
John Jamieson and Valpal1's comments

Combining your excellent posts...along w/some extra comments


Here's what I think the prosecution has proven "beyond a reasonable doubt":



1. What.. Homicide and kidnapping

2. Who - deceased victim Danielle Van Dam

3. When - Sometime between 2/1 and 2/17 (Exact date and time of death and date and time of dumping both unknown)

4. Where removed from her home-, and killed somewhere within the area between her home and body location on Dahesa Rd.

5. How - Exact cause of death unknown. More than likely suffocation, determined by elimination method Danielle van Dam is dead, her pajamas were removed and her nude body was illegally dumped off of Dehesa Road Person(s) who dumped her is also unknown, But a suspect was arrested and charged. Manner of death is also unknown, posion, drugs, stabbing, strangulation and bullet have been elminated. ME could not elimate suffocation.
Young girls don't just die, she's seven, not seventy-seven. Accidental suffocation of seven year olds generally involve appliances like refridgerators or accidental asphyxation by caught clothing. Course, it's highly unusual for children to disrobe for hide-n-seek or for corpses to shed clothing that strangled them, so nudity in an accidental suffocation is a red flag to investigators and most manuals will tell you in such cases to look for pornoghaphy and autoerotic paraphanalia. Although that would also be highly unusual behavior in a seven year old as well.

There is ample proof that she had no organic desease or defect (natural causes). Claims that she could have died by her own acts of misadventure do not explain the location of the body. Claims that her nude body was placed there to cover up an accidental death that no one caused lack basic logic.

Either the minimal forensic evidence in DW's home and RV was left there through prior casual contact (cookie sale) and transference or it didn't. But it most certainly did not get there by Danielle wandering over and accidently suffocating in the nude while no one was around


6. Why - Criminal intent or to prevent discovery of other crime (felony murder).
7. Defendant --David Westerfield, neighbor of Danielle.

8. Known previous contact--Danielle van Dam was once in David Westerfield's home to sell him girl scout cookies. Brenda and DW had spoken in a bar and grill called "Dads" on 2 separate occasions.. Stipulated by both sides.

9.Known evidence --Danielle's dog hair, her hair and blood found in motorhome. Blood from both Danielle and David Westerfield on DW's jacket. DW had scratches on his arm and possibly legs. Fibers with common source.. found on or near Danielle's body and David Westerfields home. Child pornography, both legal and illegal found in DW's home office. Danielle was found nude, with her necklace on. Various fibers, hairs vegetative growth located on and around her body.


Special Notes
various thoughts and suggestions by various freepers

21 posted on 07/12/2002 7:42:07 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
Knapp, she said, was paid between $50 to $100 a week to baby-sit her children for two hours a day, five days a week after school.

Latchkey kids: yet another opportunity for pedophiles.

22 posted on 07/12/2002 7:42:24 AM PDT by crypt2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
There is NO evidence DW was EVER in the van Dam's house.
23 posted on 07/12/2002 7:45:43 AM PDT by crypt2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
I'm confused about the phone 'traps'. I remember reading that they had a 'trap' on the Van Dam's phone, did they have one on Westerfield's also?
24 posted on 07/12/2002 7:47:37 AM PDT by Krodg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
It looks like the bugs are invading again. Here.....choose your weapon:


25 posted on 07/12/2002 7:48:27 AM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: crypt2k
A child was missing by force, that's evidence...and he's a member (or was) of mensa. I'm sure he figured out how to put on gloves and get rid of shoes..
26 posted on 07/12/2002 7:49:03 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: FR_addict
I am surprised she testified about the drug use -- she should have refused to testify on the grounds it would incriminate her. So why did she? Strange.

But in the spirit of this crazy prosecution and the freeping treatment of it, of course I have two theories:

  1. She was paid to testify rather than take the fifth.
  2. Drug use is so normal and everday to her, that she was blissfully ignorant of the ramifications of her testimony.

27 posted on 07/12/2002 7:50:21 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: bvw
3. Everybody else does it!
28 posted on 07/12/2002 7:52:22 AM PDT by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
Awwwwww

"Because of him, it's just ruined everyone's lives,"

It's all about ME !

This is typical of the hedionist crowd . No one is responsible for the results of their actions

Last I heard DW did not stick the joint in her mouth and hold her nose to force her to inhale

She knows the law, she knew the company policy and she chose to ignore it.

What is done in the dark will come to the light.

29 posted on 07/12/2002 7:52:48 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bvw
This is way dvd was afraid to admit it..consequences..
30 posted on 07/12/2002 7:53:26 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Krodg
I thought they had Westerfield's tapped--but not sure.
31 posted on 07/12/2002 7:54:36 AM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
"Last I heard DW did not stick the joint in her mouth and hold her nose to force her to inhale"

Well, I'm sure you'll find someone here who will insist he did. Not only that, but he held them at gunpoint and forced them to swing!

32 posted on 07/12/2002 7:57:10 AM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
My understanding is his phones were tapped and his auto had a sensor attached.
33 posted on 07/12/2002 7:57:10 AM PDT by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
Dang, and I sprayed the thread with OFF before pinging everyone too. Maybe it's because they're not insects, but threadjackals? What sort of stuff do we need to fend of wildlife?
34 posted on 07/12/2002 7:58:06 AM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
A child was missing by force, that's evidence...and he's a member (or was) of mensa. I'm sure he figured out how to put on gloves and get rid of shoes..

How was he certain he could initiate a kidnapping: sucessfully enter the house, not raise alarm from the occupants, not get a hassle from the dog, locate and carry out a child without a fuss, not be seen while out on the sidewalk, etc., etc.

Why would a Mensan killer then not clean out his computer of incriminating porn, not discard clothing with potential blood stains, not clean out his sink traps, make comments about "good places to leave bodies", etc?

35 posted on 07/12/2002 7:59:59 AM PDT by crypt2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
LOL........now we read that this is why Damon was afraid to admit it. Someone might get in trouble. Those pesky consequences for illegal behavior.

How odd that someone actually thinks any lying was justified when the only concern should have been for Danielle. Most people I know would not be worrying about themselves while trying to help police find their missing little girl.

36 posted on 07/12/2002 8:00:27 AM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: bvw
Drug use is so normal and everday to her, that she was blissfully ignorant of the ramifications of her testimony.

When you live in a sewer you just assume everyone does..ask the rats

37 posted on 07/12/2002 8:01:21 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: crypt2k
Answer: he wouldn't. But don't even try to talk sense. They think they know he's guilty, and that's that. Don't bother them with evidence.
38 posted on 07/12/2002 8:01:47 AM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; FresnoDA
...company policy states that the "illegal use of drugs, narcotics or controlled substances off duty and off company premises is not acceptable and may result in termination...

Why would Duh Knees move from Poway with all her "friends" to Baltimore and then after losing her job move from Baltimore to Florida, which is Damon's old stomping grounds ? Why wouldn't she move back with Barbara E. and her "friends" in Poway ?
39 posted on 07/12/2002 8:02:17 AM PDT by pyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
What sort of stuff do we need to fend of wildlife?

Good question. I'm not sure. Maybe some kind of ammonia solution. I hear it works with raccoons.

40 posted on 07/12/2002 8:02:49 AM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 761-780 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson